Evaluation of the Performance of ASTA MicroIDSys, a Novel Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry System, in Identification of Bacterial Clinical Isolates

Changseung Liu, E. J. Lee, Dokyun Kim, S. Jeong
{"title":"Evaluation of the Performance of ASTA MicroIDSys, a Novel Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry System, in Identification of Bacterial Clinical Isolates","authors":"Changseung Liu, E. J. Lee, Dokyun Kim, S. Jeong","doi":"10.5145/acm.2020.23.3.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: We evaluated the performance of ASTA MicroIDSys (ASTA, Korea) and Bruker Biotyper (Bruker Daltonics, Germany) systems in the identification of bacterial isolates from clinical microbiology laboratory specimens during the study period. In addition, species for which the identification accuracy using MALDI-TOF MS systems was previously reported to be poor were also identified by comparing the MS results with those obtained using molecular identification. Methods: A total of 889 non-duplicated clinical isolates were included in this study. The results of ASTA MicroIDSys were compared with those of Bruker Biotyper; 16S rRNA sequencing was performed for the species for which results obtained using the two systems did not match. The sequences of rpoB, hisA, and/or recA for the clinical isolates of Acinetobacter species, Klebsiella species, and Burkholderia cepacia complex were analyzed and used as reference identifications. Results: The concordance rates for bacterial identification using ASTA MicroIDSys and Bruker Biotyper were 100% at the genus level and 98.3% at the species level for isolates belonging to the order Enterobacterales. Similarly, the concordance rates at the genus and species levels were 98.8% and 91.0% for glucose non-fermenting bacilli, 100% and 100% for gram-positive cocci, and 98.9% and 98.9% for other isolates, respectively. ASTA MicroIDSys was expected to correctly identify 97.9% of the 108,251 isolates identified in our clinical microbiology laboratory over the past 5 years. Conclusion: ASTA MicroIDSys showed excellent performance in bacterial identification for most of the clinically relevant species. Further extension of the database could improve the identification accuracy of ASTA MicroIDSys.","PeriodicalId":34065,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Microbiology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5145/acm.2020.23.3.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the performance of ASTA MicroIDSys (ASTA, Korea) and Bruker Biotyper (Bruker Daltonics, Germany) systems in the identification of bacterial isolates from clinical microbiology laboratory specimens during the study period. In addition, species for which the identification accuracy using MALDI-TOF MS systems was previously reported to be poor were also identified by comparing the MS results with those obtained using molecular identification. Methods: A total of 889 non-duplicated clinical isolates were included in this study. The results of ASTA MicroIDSys were compared with those of Bruker Biotyper; 16S rRNA sequencing was performed for the species for which results obtained using the two systems did not match. The sequences of rpoB, hisA, and/or recA for the clinical isolates of Acinetobacter species, Klebsiella species, and Burkholderia cepacia complex were analyzed and used as reference identifications. Results: The concordance rates for bacterial identification using ASTA MicroIDSys and Bruker Biotyper were 100% at the genus level and 98.3% at the species level for isolates belonging to the order Enterobacterales. Similarly, the concordance rates at the genus and species levels were 98.8% and 91.0% for glucose non-fermenting bacilli, 100% and 100% for gram-positive cocci, and 98.9% and 98.9% for other isolates, respectively. ASTA MicroIDSys was expected to correctly identify 97.9% of the 108,251 isolates identified in our clinical microbiology laboratory over the past 5 years. Conclusion: ASTA MicroIDSys showed excellent performance in bacterial identification for most of the clinically relevant species. Further extension of the database could improve the identification accuracy of ASTA MicroIDSys.
新型基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱系统ASTA MicroIDSys在临床分离细菌鉴定中的性能评价
背景:我们评估了ASTA MicroIDSys(韩国ASTA)和Bruker Biotyper(德国Bruker Daltonics)系统在研究期间临床微生物实验室标本中分离细菌的鉴定性能。此外,通过将MALDI-TOF质谱系统的鉴定结果与分子鉴定结果进行比较,还对先前报道的MALDI-TOF质谱系统鉴定精度较差的物种进行了鉴定。方法:本研究共纳入889株无重复临床分离株。将ASTA MicroIDSys的结果与Bruker Biotyper的结果进行比较;对使用两种系统获得的结果不匹配的物种进行16S rRNA测序。对临床分离的不动杆菌、克雷伯氏菌和洋葱伯克氏菌复合体的rpoB、hisA和/或recA序列进行分析,并作为参考鉴定。结果:ASTA MicroIDSys和Bruker Biotyper对肠杆菌目分离菌的属和种鉴定符合率分别为100%和98.3%。在属和种水平上,葡萄糖非发酵杆菌的一致性率分别为98.8%和91.0%,革兰氏阳性球菌的一致性率分别为100%和100%,其他菌株的一致性率分别为98.9%和98.9%。在过去的5年中,ASTA MicroIDSys有望正确鉴定出我们临床微生物实验室鉴定出的108,251株分离株中的97.9%。结论:ASTA MicroIDSys在大多数临床相关菌种的鉴定中表现优异。进一步扩展数据库可以提高ASTA MicroIDSys的识别精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书