The jurisdictional immunity of international organizations before the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court

Q4 Social Sciences
Barbara Tuyama Sollero
{"title":"The jurisdictional immunity of international organizations before the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court","authors":"Barbara Tuyama Sollero","doi":"10.5102/rdi.v18i1.7891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to report on the judgment of the Cristiano Paes de Castro v. United Nations and Brazil case (RE 1.034.840) regarding the jurisdictional immunity of international organizations, highlight its most relevant contributions and repercussions so far, and inquire whether the matter is finally set before Brazilian courts. The Brazilian Supreme Federal Court reasserted the immunity rule and established a binding thesis prescribing the observance of jurisdictional immunity granted by treaties. However, the conciseness of the reasoning makes it recommendable to turn to previous precedents for the clarification of the Supreme Court’s views regarding certain issues that are typically argued in immunity cases and were not expressly dealt with in this judgment. \nIn the immediate aftermath, the other courts proceeded to apply the thesis, but a recent ramification may be cause for concern, since the Superior Labour Court has extrapolated this precedent, applying it to foreign States as well.","PeriodicalId":37377,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of International Law","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v18i1.7891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to report on the judgment of the Cristiano Paes de Castro v. United Nations and Brazil case (RE 1.034.840) regarding the jurisdictional immunity of international organizations, highlight its most relevant contributions and repercussions so far, and inquire whether the matter is finally set before Brazilian courts. The Brazilian Supreme Federal Court reasserted the immunity rule and established a binding thesis prescribing the observance of jurisdictional immunity granted by treaties. However, the conciseness of the reasoning makes it recommendable to turn to previous precedents for the clarification of the Supreme Court’s views regarding certain issues that are typically argued in immunity cases and were not expressly dealt with in this judgment. In the immediate aftermath, the other courts proceeded to apply the thesis, but a recent ramification may be cause for concern, since the Superior Labour Court has extrapolated this precedent, applying it to foreign States as well.
国际组织在巴西最高联邦法院的管辖豁免
本文旨在报道关于国际组织管辖豁免的Cristiano Paes de Castro诉联合国和巴西案(RE 1.034.840)的判决,突出其迄今为止最相关的贡献和影响,并询问此事是否最终提交巴西法院。巴西最高联邦法院重申了豁免规则,并制定了一项具有约束力的原则,规定遵守条约给予的管辖豁免。然而,由于推理的简洁性,建议参考以往的先例,以澄清最高法院对豁免案件中通常辩论的某些问题的看法,这些问题在本判决中没有明确处理。在此之后,其他法院立即开始适用这一论点,但最近的后果可能引起关注,因为高级劳工法院已推断出这一先例,并将其适用于外国。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of International Law (RDI) was created as a tool for select and publish academic papers related to issues addressed by public and private international law. The Journal has a good ranking according with the Brazilian system (Qualis A1). In the quest for development and construction of critical views about international law, the Brazilian Journal of International Law has two main focus: 1. International protection of the human person: covers issues related to international environmental law, humanitarian law, internationalization of law, in addition to research on the evolution of the law of treaties as a way of expanding the contemporary international law. 2. System of legal integration: regional integration (European Union, Mercorsur, NAFTA, ASEAN), sectoral integration (WTO, ICSID), and others. Thematic issues: We intend to publish thematic issues. It aims to increase interest in the journal and its impact on the area. We apologize to the authors, but articles on other subjects will not be accepted or should expect the numbers on topics related to being appreciated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信