Urban economics in the Global South: A study of The Economist

IF 0.6 Q4 URBAN STUDIES
F. Obeng-Odoom
{"title":"Urban economics in the Global South: A study of\nThe Economist","authors":"F. Obeng-Odoom","doi":"10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2023-34-01-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urban economic analysis receives little attention in the Global South. The COVID-19 pandemic and its highly urbanized impacts made urban economics more relevant, but how it was applied warrants investigation. One way to address this issue is to examine how African economies – the focus of much attention during the peak of the COV-ID-19 pandemic (2020–2021) – were discussed among economists. Did they pay attention to the urban economy in Africa? How well did they do so? Do the resulting proposed economic policies for recovery reflect urban economic realities in Africa? With no answers from any economist, this article draws on data comprising more than five hundred articles about COVID-19 published in The Economist and their content analysis. Three results must be emphasized. First, most economic analyses were national or regional, with limited attention to Africa’s urban economies. Second, where they considered the urban economy of Africa, The Economist ’s articles, often steeped in mainstream urban economics, were quite misleading. Third, and finally, these results raise fundamental questions about The Economist ’s proposed economic policies to drive (urban) economic recovery. This study suggests that some special features of mainstream urban economics limit its potential.","PeriodicalId":54093,"journal":{"name":"Urbani Izziv-Urban Challenge","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urbani Izziv-Urban Challenge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2023-34-01-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Urban economic analysis receives little attention in the Global South. The COVID-19 pandemic and its highly urbanized impacts made urban economics more relevant, but how it was applied warrants investigation. One way to address this issue is to examine how African economies – the focus of much attention during the peak of the COV-ID-19 pandemic (2020–2021) – were discussed among economists. Did they pay attention to the urban economy in Africa? How well did they do so? Do the resulting proposed economic policies for recovery reflect urban economic realities in Africa? With no answers from any economist, this article draws on data comprising more than five hundred articles about COVID-19 published in The Economist and their content analysis. Three results must be emphasized. First, most economic analyses were national or regional, with limited attention to Africa’s urban economies. Second, where they considered the urban economy of Africa, The Economist ’s articles, often steeped in mainstream urban economics, were quite misleading. Third, and finally, these results raise fundamental questions about The Economist ’s proposed economic policies to drive (urban) economic recovery. This study suggests that some special features of mainstream urban economics limit its potential.
全球南方的城市经济学:《经济学人》研究
城市经济分析在南半球很少受到关注。2019冠状病毒病大流行及其对高度城市化的影响使城市经济学更具相关性,但其应用方式值得调查。解决这一问题的一种方法是研究经济学家如何讨论非洲经济——在2019冠状病毒病大流行高峰期(2020-2021年),非洲经济是备受关注的焦点。他们关注过非洲的城市经济吗?他们做得有多好?由此提出的促进复苏的经济政策是否反映了非洲城市经济的现实?在没有任何经济学家给出答案的情况下,本文利用了《经济学人》上发表的500多篇关于COVID-19的文章及其内容分析的数据。必须强调三个结果。首先,大多数经济分析是国家或区域的,对非洲城市经济的关注有限。其次,当他们考虑非洲的城市经济时,《经济学人》的文章往往沉浸在主流城市经济学中,这是相当误导的。第三,也是最后一点,这些结果对《经济学人》提出的推动(城市)经济复苏的经济政策提出了根本性的问题。研究表明,主流城市经济学的一些特点限制了其发展潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信