Are science metrics beneficial to sustainability? A standpoint of disciplines with a societal impact

IF 0.5 Q3 GEOGRAPHY
A. Petrisor, Oana-Ramona Ilovan
{"title":"Are science metrics beneficial to sustainability? A standpoint of disciplines with a societal impact","authors":"A. Petrisor, Oana-Ramona Ilovan","doi":"10.47743/pesd2023171009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Both sustainability and planning require interdisciplinary approaches. Moreover, an interdisciplinary approach is required to the sciences contributing to planning for sustainable local communities. Nevertheless, current criteria governing science, particularly career promotion and research funding, overemphasize the contribution of research to scientific progress and economic growth, disregarding its societal impact. The new European framework research program and Romanian strategy for research promise a change. In order to meet this need, the current study aims to respond to this challenge by analyzing two examples of disciplines contributing to sustainable local development, yet disadvantaged by the previous strategies. We analyzed qualitatively urban/landscape ecology and humanistic geography based on their presence and representation in data from the Romanian Classification of Occupations, criteria used in academic and research career advancement, and funding programs, and phrased some recommendations for helping the development of similar research areas in the future.","PeriodicalId":42850,"journal":{"name":"Present Environment and Sustainable Development","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Present Environment and Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47743/pesd2023171009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Both sustainability and planning require interdisciplinary approaches. Moreover, an interdisciplinary approach is required to the sciences contributing to planning for sustainable local communities. Nevertheless, current criteria governing science, particularly career promotion and research funding, overemphasize the contribution of research to scientific progress and economic growth, disregarding its societal impact. The new European framework research program and Romanian strategy for research promise a change. In order to meet this need, the current study aims to respond to this challenge by analyzing two examples of disciplines contributing to sustainable local development, yet disadvantaged by the previous strategies. We analyzed qualitatively urban/landscape ecology and humanistic geography based on their presence and representation in data from the Romanian Classification of Occupations, criteria used in academic and research career advancement, and funding programs, and phrased some recommendations for helping the development of similar research areas in the future.
科学指标是否有利于可持续发展?具有社会影响的学科立场
可持续性和规划都需要跨学科的方法。此外,需要对有助于规划可持续地方社区的科学采取跨学科的办法。然而,目前管理科学的标准,特别是职业晋升和研究经费,过分强调研究对科学进步和经济增长的贡献,而忽视了它的社会影响。新的欧洲框架研究计划和罗马尼亚研究战略有望带来改变。为了满足这一需求,本研究旨在通过分析两个学科的例子来应对这一挑战,这些学科有助于当地的可持续发展,但却因以前的战略而处于不利地位。我们定性分析了城市/景观生态学和人文地理学,基于它们在罗马尼亚职业分类数据中的存在和代表性,学术和研究职业发展的标准,以及资助计划,并提出了一些建议,以帮助未来类似研究领域的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
28.60%
发文量
3
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信