The aestheticization of the urban landscape of Constantine’s safeguarded sector: actors, forms and appropriation

IF 0.5 Q3 GEOGRAPHY
Abdelwahid Bouchenak, Badia Belabed-Sahraoui
{"title":"The aestheticization of the urban landscape of Constantine’s safeguarded sector: actors, forms and appropriation","authors":"Abdelwahid Bouchenak, Badia Belabed-Sahraoui","doi":"10.47743/pesd2023171005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The purpose of this article is to analyze the multiple forms of the aestheticization of the historic urban landscape, as well as the impact of these practices on the quality, image and identity of heritage spaces, and their appropriation by users and residents. The safeguarded sector of the city of Constantine has undergone a profound aestheticization operation of its built heritage and public space. However, some operations were deficient and they have damaged the historic urban landscape. This raises questions about the reason of this situation, especially, the threat to the image and the identity of the heritage areas. Several hypotheses can be envisaged, including the lack of heritage culture among public stakeholders, ignorance of the status of the safeguarded sector and some management aspects. To confirm this, we adopt a qualitative approach based on the use of several data collection instruments concerning several intervention operations undertaken during the last decade. This research shows that the process of the aestheticization has had several qualities and shortcomings in terms of the requirements of respecting the historical character, the quality of public spaces, and the response to the expectations of users. Understanding the gap could lead to a renewal of the interventions’ modalities in order to preserve and modernize correctly the heritage areas.","PeriodicalId":42850,"journal":{"name":"Present Environment and Sustainable Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Present Environment and Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47743/pesd2023171005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: The purpose of this article is to analyze the multiple forms of the aestheticization of the historic urban landscape, as well as the impact of these practices on the quality, image and identity of heritage spaces, and their appropriation by users and residents. The safeguarded sector of the city of Constantine has undergone a profound aestheticization operation of its built heritage and public space. However, some operations were deficient and they have damaged the historic urban landscape. This raises questions about the reason of this situation, especially, the threat to the image and the identity of the heritage areas. Several hypotheses can be envisaged, including the lack of heritage culture among public stakeholders, ignorance of the status of the safeguarded sector and some management aspects. To confirm this, we adopt a qualitative approach based on the use of several data collection instruments concerning several intervention operations undertaken during the last decade. This research shows that the process of the aestheticization has had several qualities and shortcomings in terms of the requirements of respecting the historical character, the quality of public spaces, and the response to the expectations of users. Understanding the gap could lead to a renewal of the interventions’ modalities in order to preserve and modernize correctly the heritage areas.
君士坦丁保护区域的城市景观审美化:角色,形式和挪用
本文的目的是分析历史城市景观审美化的多种形式,以及这些做法对遗产空间的质量、形象和身份的影响,以及使用者和居民对它们的占用。君士坦丁市的受保护区域对其建筑遗产和公共空间进行了深刻的审美化操作。然而,一些行动不足,破坏了历史悠久的城市景观。这引起了人们对这种情况的原因的质疑,特别是对遗产地区的形象和身份的威胁。可以设想几种假设,包括公共利益相关者缺乏遗产文化,不了解受保护部门的状况以及某些管理方面。为了证实这一点,我们采用了一种定性方法,该方法基于过去十年中进行的几次干预操作中使用的几种数据收集工具。研究表明,在尊重历史特征的要求、公共空间的质量要求以及对使用者期望的回应方面,审美化的过程存在着一些品质和不足。了解这一差距可能会导致干预模式的更新,以便正确地保护和现代化遗产地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
28.60%
发文量
3
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信