{"title":"Romanul comunismului românesc înainte și după Istoria lui Mihai Iovănel","authors":"Bogdan Contea","doi":"10.51391/trva.2023.05-06.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper makes a case for analyzing the way in which the novel of Communism is approached by Mihai Iovănel in his History of Contemporary Romanian Literature: 1990-2020. This is a topic that was intensely discussed by Romanian literary criticism in Post-communism and represents the weakness of Romanian literature, either by it not being able to give a sufficiently convincing novel, or by not being able to agree upon how this novel should look. Accordingly, the critics had difficulties in labeling any novel that had been published after ‘89s as “the novel of communism.” The first part of the article is a panning of recent discussions about this term in relation to the analysis made by Iovănel in his History. The second part aims to trace out a network of this type of novel in the literatures of Central and Eastern Europe and to try to identify its particularities through a comparative analysis. The last part consists of a study case of the novels Acasă, pe câmpia Armaghedonului [At home, on the Field of Armageddon] by Marta Petreu and Bureți de Fag [Oyster Mushrooms] by Mihai Duțescu. The latter has been published after the History and both novels are analyzed from the perspective of the novel of communism.","PeriodicalId":39326,"journal":{"name":"Revista Transilvania","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Transilvania","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51391/trva.2023.05-06.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper makes a case for analyzing the way in which the novel of Communism is approached by Mihai Iovănel in his History of Contemporary Romanian Literature: 1990-2020. This is a topic that was intensely discussed by Romanian literary criticism in Post-communism and represents the weakness of Romanian literature, either by it not being able to give a sufficiently convincing novel, or by not being able to agree upon how this novel should look. Accordingly, the critics had difficulties in labeling any novel that had been published after ‘89s as “the novel of communism.” The first part of the article is a panning of recent discussions about this term in relation to the analysis made by Iovănel in his History. The second part aims to trace out a network of this type of novel in the literatures of Central and Eastern Europe and to try to identify its particularities through a comparative analysis. The last part consists of a study case of the novels Acasă, pe câmpia Armaghedonului [At home, on the Field of Armageddon] by Marta Petreu and Bureți de Fag [Oyster Mushrooms] by Mihai Duțescu. The latter has been published after the History and both novels are analyzed from the perspective of the novel of communism.
本文分析了米哈伊·约夫洛涅尔在其《当代罗马尼亚文学史:1990-2020》中描写共产主义小说的方式。后共产主义时期,罗马尼亚文学评论界对这个话题进行了激烈的讨论,这代表了罗马尼亚文学的弱点,要么是无法写出一部足够令人信服的小说,要么是无法就这部小说的外观达成一致。因此,评论家们很难给89年后出版的小说贴上“共产主义小说”的标签。文章的第一部分是对最近关于这一术语的讨论的规划,并与约瑟夫内尔在他的《历史》中所做的分析相联系。第二部分旨在勾勒出这类小说在中欧和东欧文学中的网络,并试图通过比较分析来识别其特殊性。最后以玛尔塔·佩特鲁的小说《在家里,在世界末日的田野上》和米海Duțescu的小说《牡蛎》Bureți de Fag为研究案例。后者是在《历史》之后出版的,本文从共产主义小说的角度对两部小说进行了分析。