Comprensión lectora en alumnos de secundaria. intervención por niveles funcionales

Karlena Cárdenas-Espinoza , Yolanda Guevara-Benítez
{"title":"Comprensión lectora en alumnos de secundaria. intervención por niveles funcionales","authors":"Karlena Cárdenas-Espinoza ,&nbsp;Yolanda Guevara-Benítez","doi":"10.5460/jbhsi.v5.1.38727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span></span>A study was conducted to assess the effects of two intervention strategies aimed at developing reading comprehension at different levels of functional complexity, with first grade students from a public junior high school of Mexico City. A total of 90 students participated -53% were female and 47% ware male, with ages between 12 and 14 years and a mean age of 12 years 9 months enrolled in three different groups from the morning shift. These three groups were assigned, one as control and two as experimental groups that received the same training, only modifying the reading materials used literary or nature themes-. The intervention effects were measured with tests of reading comprehension assessment of literary and nature themes, through a pre and post test experimental design. The results indicate that both experimental groups achieved high levels of reading comprehension, with no differences between them. Differences were found regarding the control group, concluding that intervention was appropriate to develop reading comprehension and to ensure transference of the skills developed to other non-trained topics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues","volume":"5 1","pages":"Pages 67-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5460/jbhsi.v5.1.38727","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2007078013716833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

A study was conducted to assess the effects of two intervention strategies aimed at developing reading comprehension at different levels of functional complexity, with first grade students from a public junior high school of Mexico City. A total of 90 students participated -53% were female and 47% ware male, with ages between 12 and 14 years and a mean age of 12 years 9 months enrolled in three different groups from the morning shift. These three groups were assigned, one as control and two as experimental groups that received the same training, only modifying the reading materials used literary or nature themes-. The intervention effects were measured with tests of reading comprehension assessment of literary and nature themes, through a pre and post test experimental design. The results indicate that both experimental groups achieved high levels of reading comprehension, with no differences between them. Differences were found regarding the control group, concluding that intervention was appropriate to develop reading comprehension and to ensure transference of the skills developed to other non-trained topics.

中学生的阅读理解能力。按功能水平进行干预
本研究以墨西哥城一所公立初中一年级学生为研究对象,评估了两种干预策略对不同功能复杂性水平阅读理解能力的影响。共有90名学生参与其中,53%为女生,47%为男生,年龄在12 - 14岁之间,平均年龄为12岁9个月,从早班开始分为三个不同的组。这三组被分配,一组作为对照组,两组作为实验组,接受同样的训练,只修改阅读材料使用文学或自然主题。干预效果通过文学和自然主题的阅读理解评估测试来衡量,通过测试前和测试后的实验设计。结果表明,两组学生的阅读理解水平均达到较高水平,两组学生之间没有差异。在对照组中发现了差异,结论是干预是适当的,以发展阅读理解,并确保将发展的技能转移到其他非训练主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信