Pupillary dynamics and accommodative response in mild traumatic brain injury.

IF 1 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2023-05-23 eCollection Date: 2024-04-01 DOI:10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-22-00169
Pritam Dutta, Ayisha Atiya, Smita Vittal, S Ambika, Jameel Rizwana Hussaindeen
{"title":"Pupillary dynamics and accommodative response in mild traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Pritam Dutta, Ayisha Atiya, Smita Vittal, S Ambika, Jameel Rizwana Hussaindeen","doi":"10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-22-00169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To measure the pupillary dynamics and accommodative response in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) as compared to age-matched controls.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective comparative study was carried out at the neuro-optometry clinic of a tertiary eye care hospital. Sixty-three subjects with a history of mTBI and ninety age-matched controls were enrolled in this study. Subjects in the age range of 18-35 years were included in the study. A comprehensive neuro-optometric assessment was performed followed by pupillary dynamics and accommodation response measurements using NeurOptics® pupillary light reflex™-3000 and Grand-Seiko WAM-5500 binocular accommodation auto ref/keratometer | shigiya machinery works LTD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant difference was noticed for constriction percentage (%): 32.73 ± 9.20 versus 39.93 ± 7.36 (<i>P</i> < 0.001), average constriction velocity (mm/s): 2.24 ± 0.85 versus 2.62 ± 0.68 (<i>P</i> = 0.002), maximum constriction velocity (mm/s): 3.82 ± 1.33 versus 4.42 ± 0.93 (<i>P</i> = 0.004) and T75 (recovery period to 75% of the baseline pupillary diameter in sec): 1.38 ± 0.36 versus 2.0 ± 0.82 (<i>P</i> < 0.001) in mTBI compared to age-matched controls. A statistically significant difference was noted for accommodative response (in D) as well as in the sample as compared to age-matched controls: -1.12 ± 0.64 versus - 1.39 ± 0.47 (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pupillary constriction velocities and accommodative response are significantly affected in mTBI. These findings have important clinical implications in being able to understand the visual symptoms following an mTBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":44978,"journal":{"name":"Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11253999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-22-00169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To measure the pupillary dynamics and accommodative response in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) as compared to age-matched controls.

Materials and methods: This prospective comparative study was carried out at the neuro-optometry clinic of a tertiary eye care hospital. Sixty-three subjects with a history of mTBI and ninety age-matched controls were enrolled in this study. Subjects in the age range of 18-35 years were included in the study. A comprehensive neuro-optometric assessment was performed followed by pupillary dynamics and accommodation response measurements using NeurOptics® pupillary light reflex™-3000 and Grand-Seiko WAM-5500 binocular accommodation auto ref/keratometer | shigiya machinery works LTD.

Results: A statistically significant difference was noticed for constriction percentage (%): 32.73 ± 9.20 versus 39.93 ± 7.36 (P < 0.001), average constriction velocity (mm/s): 2.24 ± 0.85 versus 2.62 ± 0.68 (P = 0.002), maximum constriction velocity (mm/s): 3.82 ± 1.33 versus 4.42 ± 0.93 (P = 0.004) and T75 (recovery period to 75% of the baseline pupillary diameter in sec): 1.38 ± 0.36 versus 2.0 ± 0.82 (P < 0.001) in mTBI compared to age-matched controls. A statistically significant difference was noted for accommodative response (in D) as well as in the sample as compared to age-matched controls: -1.12 ± 0.64 versus - 1.39 ± 0.47 (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Pupillary constriction velocities and accommodative response are significantly affected in mTBI. These findings have important clinical implications in being able to understand the visual symptoms following an mTBI.

轻度脑外伤的瞳孔动态和适应反应。
目的:与年龄匹配的对照组相比,测量轻度脑外伤(mTBI)患者的瞳孔动态和适应反应:这项前瞻性比较研究在一家三级眼科医院的神经视光诊所进行。研究共招募了 63 名有 mTBI 病史的受试者和 90 名年龄匹配的对照组受试者。研究对象的年龄在 18-35 岁之间。研究人员使用 NeurOptics® pupillary light reflex™-3000 和 Grand-Seiko WAM-5500 双目调节自动反射/角膜计进行了全面的神经视力评估,随后使用 NeurOptics® pupillary light reflex™-3000 和 Grand-Seiko WAM-5500 双目调节自动反射/角膜计测量了瞳孔动态和调节反应:收缩百分比(%)的差异具有统计学意义:3.82 ± 1.33 对 4.42 ± 0.93(P = 0.004),T75(恢复到基线瞳孔直径 75% 的时间,秒):与年龄匹配的对照组相比,mTBI患者的T75(恢复到基线瞳孔直径75%的时间,以秒为单位):1.38 ± 0.36对2.0 ± 0.82(P < 0.001)。与年龄匹配的对照组相比,适应反应(以 D 为单位)以及样本中的适应反应均存在明显的统计学差异:-1.12 ± 0.64 对 - 1.39 ± 0.47(P < 0.001):结论:瞳孔收缩速度和适应反应在 mTBI 中受到显著影响。这些发现对理解 mTBI 后的视觉症状具有重要的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
68
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信