Comparison of Cold and Room Temperature Silicone Plastination Techniques Using Tissue Core Samples and a Variety of Plastinates

Q4 Medicine
D. Starchik, R. Henry
{"title":"Comparison of Cold and Room Temperature Silicone Plastination Techniques Using Tissue Core Samples and a Variety of Plastinates","authors":"D. Starchik, R. Henry","doi":"10.56507/ntqj7764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"2 College of Veterinary Medicine, Lincoln Memorial University, Harrogate, TN, USA ABSTRACT: A variety of organs, body regions and whole body specimens were plastinated using standard procedures for both cold and room temperature silicone plastination techniques. From these plastinates, advantages and shortcomings of both methods were evaluated. Criteria used for evaluation of plastinates included: duration of impregnation and curing, quality of plastinated specimens, need for extra equipment and its maintenance, as well as other cost considerations. To efficiently evaluate shrinkage and plastination duration, 3 cm pieces (core samples) of parenchymatous organs and 7 cm lengths from intestinal segments were collected, dehydrated and plastinated using standard procedures for both cold and room temperature silicone plastination techniques. Core sample volume was evaluated at the end of each stage of the process by fluid displacement. Shrinkage of samples was calculated after each stage of plastination. Evaluation of this information showed that the room temperature plastination technique takes about 35% less time for impregnation and curing, causes an average 8% less specimen shrinkage, produces life-like hair, fur or feathered specimens and it is more costefficient. The cold temperature plastination technique produces more flexible and elastic specimens and is preferable for whole body plastination.","PeriodicalId":36740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastination","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56507/ntqj7764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

2 College of Veterinary Medicine, Lincoln Memorial University, Harrogate, TN, USA ABSTRACT: A variety of organs, body regions and whole body specimens were plastinated using standard procedures for both cold and room temperature silicone plastination techniques. From these plastinates, advantages and shortcomings of both methods were evaluated. Criteria used for evaluation of plastinates included: duration of impregnation and curing, quality of plastinated specimens, need for extra equipment and its maintenance, as well as other cost considerations. To efficiently evaluate shrinkage and plastination duration, 3 cm pieces (core samples) of parenchymatous organs and 7 cm lengths from intestinal segments were collected, dehydrated and plastinated using standard procedures for both cold and room temperature silicone plastination techniques. Core sample volume was evaluated at the end of each stage of the process by fluid displacement. Shrinkage of samples was calculated after each stage of plastination. Evaluation of this information showed that the room temperature plastination technique takes about 35% less time for impregnation and curing, causes an average 8% less specimen shrinkage, produces life-like hair, fur or feathered specimens and it is more costefficient. The cold temperature plastination technique produces more flexible and elastic specimens and is preferable for whole body plastination.
使用组织芯样品和各种塑化剂的低温和室温硅胶塑化技术的比较
摘要:采用低温硅胶塑化和室温硅胶塑化技术的标准程序对不同器官、身体部位和全身标本进行塑化。从这些塑化物出发,评价了两种方法的优缺点。用于评估塑化物的标准包括:浸渍和固化的持续时间,塑化试样的质量,需要额外的设备及其维护,以及其他成本考虑。为了有效地评估收缩和塑化持续时间,我们收集了3厘米厚的实质器官和7厘米长的肠段,使用低温和室温硅胶塑化技术的标准程序进行脱水和塑化。在每个阶段结束时,通过流体驱替来评估岩心样本量。在每个塑化阶段后计算样品的收缩率。对这些信息的评估表明,室温塑化技术的浸渍和固化时间减少了约35%,试样的平均收缩率减少了8%,可以制作出逼真的毛发、毛皮或羽毛样品,而且成本更低。低温塑化技术可以产生更柔韧性和弹性的样品,更适合全身塑化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Plastination
Journal of Plastination Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信