Suppression of perioperative stress response in elective abdominal surgery: A randomized comparison between dexmedetomidine and epidural block.

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Rashmi Salhotra, Vishal Kamal, Asha Tyagi, Mohit Mehndiratta, Rajesh S Rautela, Edelbert A Almeida
{"title":"Suppression of perioperative stress response in elective abdominal surgery: A randomized comparison between dexmedetomidine and epidural block.","authors":"Rashmi Salhotra, Vishal Kamal, Asha Tyagi, Mohit Mehndiratta, Rajesh S Rautela, Edelbert A Almeida","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_559_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Stress response after surgery induces local and systemic inflammation which may be detrimental if it goes unchecked. Blockade of afferent neurons or inhibition of hypothalamic function may mitigate the stress response.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 50 consenting adult ASA I/II patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery were randomized to receive either dexmedetomidine (<b>Group D</b>) or epidural bupivacaine (<b>Group E</b>) in addition to balanced general anesthesia. Laparoscopic surgery, contraindications to epidural administration, history of psychiatric disorders, obesity (BMI >30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), on beta blockers or continuous steroid therapy for >5 days over last 1 year, and known case of endocrine abnormalities or malignancy were excluded. Serum cortisol, blood glucose, and blood urea were estimated. Hemodynamic parameters, total dose of dexmedetomidine, bupivacaine, emergence characteristics, and analgesic consumption over 24 h postoperatively were recorded. Statistical comparisons were done using Student's t-test, repeated measure analysis of variance followed by Dunnett's test, generalized linear model and Chi-square/Fisher's exact test. A <i>P</i> value <0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Serum cortisol levels were significantly lower in group E than group D 24 h after surgery (<i>P</i> = 0.029). Intraoperative and postoperative glucose level was lower in group E compared with group D. Time to request of first rescue analgesic was longer in group E than group D (<i>P</i> = 0.040). There was no significant difference between the number of doses of paracetamol required in the postoperative period (<i>P</i> = 0.198).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Epidural bupivacaine was more effective than intravenous dexmedetomidine for suppression of neuroendocrine and metabolic response to surgery. Dexmedetomidine provided better hemodynamic stability at the time of noxious stimuli and postoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10661627/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_559_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Stress response after surgery induces local and systemic inflammation which may be detrimental if it goes unchecked. Blockade of afferent neurons or inhibition of hypothalamic function may mitigate the stress response.

Material and methods: A total of 50 consenting adult ASA I/II patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery were randomized to receive either dexmedetomidine (Group D) or epidural bupivacaine (Group E) in addition to balanced general anesthesia. Laparoscopic surgery, contraindications to epidural administration, history of psychiatric disorders, obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2), on beta blockers or continuous steroid therapy for >5 days over last 1 year, and known case of endocrine abnormalities or malignancy were excluded. Serum cortisol, blood glucose, and blood urea were estimated. Hemodynamic parameters, total dose of dexmedetomidine, bupivacaine, emergence characteristics, and analgesic consumption over 24 h postoperatively were recorded. Statistical comparisons were done using Student's t-test, repeated measure analysis of variance followed by Dunnett's test, generalized linear model and Chi-square/Fisher's exact test. A P value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: Serum cortisol levels were significantly lower in group E than group D 24 h after surgery (P = 0.029). Intraoperative and postoperative glucose level was lower in group E compared with group D. Time to request of first rescue analgesic was longer in group E than group D (P = 0.040). There was no significant difference between the number of doses of paracetamol required in the postoperative period (P = 0.198).

Conclusion: Epidural bupivacaine was more effective than intravenous dexmedetomidine for suppression of neuroendocrine and metabolic response to surgery. Dexmedetomidine provided better hemodynamic stability at the time of noxious stimuli and postoperatively.

选择性腹部手术围手术期应激反应的抑制:右美托咪定和硬膜外阻滞的随机比较。
背景和目的:手术后的应激反应引起局部和全身炎症,如果不加以控制,可能是有害的。阻断传入神经元或抑制下丘脑功能可减轻应激反应。材料和方法:共有50名同意接受选择性腹部手术的成人ASA I/II患者随机接受右美托咪定(D组)或硬膜外布比卡因(E组),以及平衡全身麻醉。排除腹腔镜手术、硬膜外给药禁禁症、精神疾病史、肥胖(BMI >30 kg/m2)、过去1年内使用受体阻滞剂或持续使用类固醇治疗>5天、已知内分泌异常或恶性肿瘤病例。测定血清皮质醇、血糖和尿素。记录术后24 h血流动力学参数、右美托咪定、布比卡因总剂量、急诊特征及镇痛药用量。统计学比较采用Student’st检验、重复测量方差分析、Dunnett检验、广义线性模型和卡方/费雪精确检验。结果:术后24 h E组血清皮质醇水平显著低于D组(P = 0.029)。E组术中、术后血糖水平均低于D组。E组要求首次抢救镇痛的时间较D组长(P = 0.040)。两组患者术后使用扑热息痛的剂量差异无统计学意义(P = 0.198)。结论:硬膜外布比卡因比静脉注射右美托咪定更有效地抑制手术后神经内分泌和代谢反应。右美托咪定在有害刺激时和术后提供了更好的血流动力学稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信