Analysis of Medicolegal Examination in Alleged Sexual Abuse Presented to a Tertiary Care Hospital in Sri Lanka

Q3 Social Sciences
G. I. D. Kitulwatte, H. Wijewardena, P. Edirisinghe, U. Senarathne
{"title":"Analysis of Medicolegal Examination in Alleged Sexual Abuse Presented to a Tertiary Care Hospital in Sri Lanka","authors":"G. I. D. Kitulwatte, H. Wijewardena, P. Edirisinghe, U. Senarathne","doi":"10.4103/jfsm.jfsm_44_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forensic experts are often expected to provide an opinion on alleged physical or sexual contact between individuals following medicolegal examination of a case of sexual abuse (SA). There are many factors influencing the opinion. A retrospective descriptive study was performed to study the factors influencing the medicolegal opinion in SA forensic examination using medical and medicolegal records of alleged SA victims to extract data. Records of 441 victims were studied. A majority, 180 (40%), presented due to the guardian’s concerns – 302 (68%) presented for medicolegal examination 72 h after the incident. Recent injuries were observed in only 15% of the victims. Genital injuries were observed in 74% of the victims brought due to concerns of the guardians, with 12 victims having recent injuries. Of the 172 victims who complained of vaginal intercourse, 21% had recent injuries. A firm positive medicolegal opinion could be given in 63% of all cases. In 124 individuals, a firm positive or negative opinion could not be given. A majority (n = 90, 73%) of these individuals did not have any injuries, while 23% had healed injuries. According to the nature of the complaint, in a significant number of victims (53%), no scientific evidence was present to make a firm opinion. The nature of the sexual act and the absence of injuries influence the medicolegal opinion on SA, making it a challenging task for forensic experts.","PeriodicalId":36434,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfsm.jfsm_44_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forensic experts are often expected to provide an opinion on alleged physical or sexual contact between individuals following medicolegal examination of a case of sexual abuse (SA). There are many factors influencing the opinion. A retrospective descriptive study was performed to study the factors influencing the medicolegal opinion in SA forensic examination using medical and medicolegal records of alleged SA victims to extract data. Records of 441 victims were studied. A majority, 180 (40%), presented due to the guardian’s concerns – 302 (68%) presented for medicolegal examination 72 h after the incident. Recent injuries were observed in only 15% of the victims. Genital injuries were observed in 74% of the victims brought due to concerns of the guardians, with 12 victims having recent injuries. Of the 172 victims who complained of vaginal intercourse, 21% had recent injuries. A firm positive medicolegal opinion could be given in 63% of all cases. In 124 individuals, a firm positive or negative opinion could not be given. A majority (n = 90, 73%) of these individuals did not have any injuries, while 23% had healed injuries. According to the nature of the complaint, in a significant number of victims (53%), no scientific evidence was present to make a firm opinion. The nature of the sexual act and the absence of injuries influence the medicolegal opinion on SA, making it a challenging task for forensic experts.
斯里兰卡一家三级保健医院提交的涉嫌性虐待案件的法医检查分析
在对性虐待案件进行法医检查后,往往期望法医专家就所指控的个人之间的身体接触或性接触提供意见(SA)。影响这个观点的因素有很多。本研究采用回顾性描述性研究方法,利用被控暴力受害者的医学和法医学记录提取数据,研究影响暴力法医鉴定中法医鉴定意见的因素。研究了441名受害者的记录。大多数,180例(40%),由于监护人的关切而提交,302例(68%),在事件发生72小时后提交法医检查。只有15%的受害者最近受伤。由于监护人的担忧,74%的受害者生殖器受伤,其中12名受害者最近受伤。在172名抱怨阴道性交的受害者中,21%的人最近受过伤。在所有案件中,有63%可以给出坚定的肯定的医学法律意见。124人无法给出肯定或否定的意见。这些个体中的大多数(n = 90,73%)没有任何损伤,而23%的人伤口愈合。根据投诉的性质,在相当多的受害者(53%)中,没有科学证据可以提出坚定的意见。性行为的性质和没有伤害会影响对性侵的法医意见,使其成为法医专家的一项具有挑战性的任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
39 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信