Skin reactions to COVID-19 vaccination among Egyptians in three governorates

IF 0.3 Q4 DERMATOLOGY
Osama Alkady, Sara Abdelhameed, Shymaa Rezk
{"title":"Skin reactions to COVID-19 vaccination among Egyptians in three governorates","authors":"Osama Alkady, Sara Abdelhameed, Shymaa Rezk","doi":"10.4103/jewd.jewd_26_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background In the first 6 months of the pandemic, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) caused more than a million deaths. Vaccines from several manufacturers, such as Pfizer-BioNTeck, AstraZeneca’s Vaxzevria, and Sinopharm, have been used in an effort to contain the pandemic. Objective To evaluate the skin reactions that occurred after receiving multiple types of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) vaccinations among Egyptians in three governorates. Patients and methods This clinical cohort study was conducted on 1000 individuals receiving COVID vaccines. The registry’s vaccination module gathered data on vaccine dosage dates, cutaneous reaction(s), reaction timing, and duration. There were four categories of adverse responses to vaccines: systemic, local acute site reactions, delayed local skin reactions, and generalized cutaneous side effects. Results Of all individuals, 53.1% had previously contracted Covid-19. 76.3% of the study patients experienced systemic side effects. 91.4% of patients had an ‘injection site’ acute local cutaneous side effect. The Johnson and Johnson vaccination was associated with the highest systemic and local cutaneous side effects incidence, whereas the Sinopharm vaccine was linked to the lowest incidence. 10.2% of individuals experienced delayed cutaneous reactions, with the AstraZeneca vaccine having the greatest incidence and the Pfizer vaccine having the lowest. Conclusion Acute cutaneous side effect differs from one vaccine to another. Johnson and Johnson was associated more with bruising and redness, AstraZeneca was more associated with itching, and Pfizer was linked to increased discomfort and tenderness at the injection site. The AstraZeneca vaccination showed the highest prevalence of delayed cutaneous side effects.","PeriodicalId":17298,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Egyptian Women's Dermatologic Society","volume":"20 1","pages":"187 - 195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Egyptian Women's Dermatologic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jewd.jewd_26_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background In the first 6 months of the pandemic, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) caused more than a million deaths. Vaccines from several manufacturers, such as Pfizer-BioNTeck, AstraZeneca’s Vaxzevria, and Sinopharm, have been used in an effort to contain the pandemic. Objective To evaluate the skin reactions that occurred after receiving multiple types of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) vaccinations among Egyptians in three governorates. Patients and methods This clinical cohort study was conducted on 1000 individuals receiving COVID vaccines. The registry’s vaccination module gathered data on vaccine dosage dates, cutaneous reaction(s), reaction timing, and duration. There were four categories of adverse responses to vaccines: systemic, local acute site reactions, delayed local skin reactions, and generalized cutaneous side effects. Results Of all individuals, 53.1% had previously contracted Covid-19. 76.3% of the study patients experienced systemic side effects. 91.4% of patients had an ‘injection site’ acute local cutaneous side effect. The Johnson and Johnson vaccination was associated with the highest systemic and local cutaneous side effects incidence, whereas the Sinopharm vaccine was linked to the lowest incidence. 10.2% of individuals experienced delayed cutaneous reactions, with the AstraZeneca vaccine having the greatest incidence and the Pfizer vaccine having the lowest. Conclusion Acute cutaneous side effect differs from one vaccine to another. Johnson and Johnson was associated more with bruising and redness, AstraZeneca was more associated with itching, and Pfizer was linked to increased discomfort and tenderness at the injection site. The AstraZeneca vaccination showed the highest prevalence of delayed cutaneous side effects.
三个省埃及人对COVID-19疫苗接种的皮肤反应
在大流行的前6个月,严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)造成100多万人死亡。辉瑞bioteck、阿斯利康(AstraZeneca)的Vaxzevria和中国医药集团(Sinopharm)等几家生产商的疫苗已被用于控制疫情。目的了解三省埃及人接种多种新型冠状病毒病-19 (COVID-19)疫苗后发生的皮肤反应。患者和方法本研究对1000例接种COVID - 19疫苗的个体进行了临床队列研究。登记处的疫苗接种模块收集有关疫苗剂量日期、皮肤反应、反应时间和持续时间的数据。疫苗不良反应有四类:全身性、局部急性部位反应、延迟性局部皮肤反应和全身皮肤副作用。结果在所有个体中,53.1%以前感染过Covid-19。76.3%的研究患者出现全身副作用。91.4%的患者有“注射部位”急性局部皮肤副作用。强生疫苗的全身和局部皮肤副作用发生率最高,而国药集团疫苗的发生率最低。10.2%的个体出现延迟性皮肤反应,阿斯利康疫苗的发生率最高,辉瑞疫苗的发生率最低。结论不同疫苗急性皮肤副反应不同。强生(Johnson and Johnson)更容易出现瘀伤和发红,阿斯利康(AstraZeneca)更容易出现瘙痒,辉瑞(Pfizer)则与注射部位的不适和压痛增加有关。阿斯利康疫苗显示,延迟皮肤副作用的发生率最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of The Egyptian Women''s Dermatologic Society (JEWDS) was founded by Professor Zenab M.G. El-Gothamy. JEWDS is published three times per year in January, May and September. Original articles, case reports, correspondence and review articles submitted for publication must be original and must not have been published previously or considered for publication elsewhere. Their subject should pertain to dermatology or a related scientific and technical subject within the field of dermatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信