Utility of reverse transcriptase - Multiplex ligation-dependant probe amplification (RT-MLPA) in the molecular classification of Diffuse Large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) by cell-of-origin (COO).

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PATHOLOGY
Nicholas Dcunha, Dhananjayan Sakhti, Elanthendral Sigamani, Jagan Chandramohan, Anu Korula, Biju George, Marie Therese Manipadam, Rekha Pai
{"title":"Utility of reverse transcriptase - Multiplex ligation-dependant probe amplification (RT-MLPA) in the molecular classification of Diffuse Large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) by cell-of-origin (COO).","authors":"Nicholas Dcunha, Dhananjayan Sakhti, Elanthendral Sigamani, Jagan Chandramohan, Anu Korula, Biju George, Marie Therese Manipadam, Rekha Pai","doi":"10.4103/ijpm.ijpm_326_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Classifying diffuse large B cell lymphomas, not otherwise specified (DLBCL, NOS), is based on their cell-of-origin (COO) which is included in the WHO classification (2016), is essential to characterize them better in context of prognostication. While gene expression profiling (GEP) considered the gold standard and more recently, the Nanostring-based approach, classify these tumors accurately, many laboratories with limited resources and instrumentation need an alternate approach that is reliable, inexpensive, and with a reasonable turnaround. The Reverse Transcriptase Multiplex Ligation Dependant Probe Amplification (RT-MLPA) to subtype DLBCL, NOS cases, as designed by CALYM group appears to provide a good alternative but needs to be validated in other centres. Therefore, this study evaluated DLBCL, NOS and compared the results of RT-MLPA to that obtained by immunohistochemistry using the Hans algorithm.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty-five DLBCL, NOS cases were included and the RT-MLPA was set up and standardized using probes that were designed by the CALYM study group. Briefly, RNA was extracted converted to cDNA and the 21-gene expression classifier that also included probes to detect MYD88 mutations and EBER mRNA was performed by MLPA. The results were analyzed by the open home grown software designed by the same group and compared to the results obtained by IHC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four of the sixty-five cases provided concordant results (k = 0.35) and if the MYD88 results were to be used as a classifier the concordance would have improved from 67.7% to 82%. The 21 discordant cases were divided into five categories to provide a possible explanation for the discordance. Further 26% and 31% of the samples tested were positive for MYD88 mutations and EBER mRNA, respectively. The test had a turnaround of three days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The test provided moderate (67.7%) concordance when compared with IHC and perhaps would have provided higher concordance if compared with GEP. The test also has the advantage of providing information on the MYD88 and EBV infection status. It was found to be reliable, easy to perform and standardize, requiring only routine instruments available in most molecular laboratories. The RT-MLPA assay therefore provides an alternative for laboratories that would require subtyping of DLBCL, NOS cases in the absence of an access to GEP or other instrument intensive methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":13488,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpm.ijpm_326_22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Classifying diffuse large B cell lymphomas, not otherwise specified (DLBCL, NOS), is based on their cell-of-origin (COO) which is included in the WHO classification (2016), is essential to characterize them better in context of prognostication. While gene expression profiling (GEP) considered the gold standard and more recently, the Nanostring-based approach, classify these tumors accurately, many laboratories with limited resources and instrumentation need an alternate approach that is reliable, inexpensive, and with a reasonable turnaround. The Reverse Transcriptase Multiplex Ligation Dependant Probe Amplification (RT-MLPA) to subtype DLBCL, NOS cases, as designed by CALYM group appears to provide a good alternative but needs to be validated in other centres. Therefore, this study evaluated DLBCL, NOS and compared the results of RT-MLPA to that obtained by immunohistochemistry using the Hans algorithm.

Materials and methods: Sixty-five DLBCL, NOS cases were included and the RT-MLPA was set up and standardized using probes that were designed by the CALYM study group. Briefly, RNA was extracted converted to cDNA and the 21-gene expression classifier that also included probes to detect MYD88 mutations and EBER mRNA was performed by MLPA. The results were analyzed by the open home grown software designed by the same group and compared to the results obtained by IHC.

Results: Forty-four of the sixty-five cases provided concordant results (k = 0.35) and if the MYD88 results were to be used as a classifier the concordance would have improved from 67.7% to 82%. The 21 discordant cases were divided into five categories to provide a possible explanation for the discordance. Further 26% and 31% of the samples tested were positive for MYD88 mutations and EBER mRNA, respectively. The test had a turnaround of three days.

Conclusion: The test provided moderate (67.7%) concordance when compared with IHC and perhaps would have provided higher concordance if compared with GEP. The test also has the advantage of providing information on the MYD88 and EBV infection status. It was found to be reliable, easy to perform and standardize, requiring only routine instruments available in most molecular laboratories. The RT-MLPA assay therefore provides an alternative for laboratories that would require subtyping of DLBCL, NOS cases in the absence of an access to GEP or other instrument intensive methods.

逆转录酶-多重连接依赖探针扩增(RT-MLPA)在按原发细胞(COO)对弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)进行分子分类中的应用。
弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL,NOS)的分类是基于其原发细胞(COO),这已被纳入世界卫生组织(WHO)的分类(2016 年)。虽然基因表达谱分析(GEP)被认为是黄金标准,最近基于纳米检测的方法也能准确地对这些肿瘤进行分类,但许多资源和仪器有限的实验室需要一种可靠、廉价、周转合理的替代方法。CALYM小组设计的反转录酶多重连接依赖探针扩增法(RT-MLPA)对DLBCL、NOS病例进行亚型,似乎提供了一种很好的替代方法,但还需要在其他中心进行验证。因此,本研究对 DLBCL、NOS 进行了评估,并使用 Hans 算法比较了 RT-MLPA 与免疫组化的结果:纳入 65 例 DLBCL、NOS 病例,使用 CALYM 研究小组设计的探针建立 RT-MLPA 并对其进行标准化。简而言之,提取 RNA 转化为 cDNA,然后通过 MLPA 进行 21 个基因表达分类,其中还包括检测 MYD88 突变和 EBER mRNA 的探针。结果由同一小组设计的开放式自制软件进行分析,并与 IHC 结果进行比较:结果:65 个病例中有 44 个提供了一致的结果(k = 0.35),如果将 MYD88 结果用作分类器,一致率将从 67.7% 提高到 82%。21 个不一致的病例被分为五类,以提供不一致的可能解释。此外,分别有 26% 和 31% 的检测样本对 MYD88 突变和 EBER mRNA 呈阳性。检验周转期为三天:结论:与 IHC 相比,该检验提供了中等(67.7%)的一致性,如果与 GEP 相比,一致性可能会更高。该检验还具有提供 MYD88 和 EBV 感染状况信息的优势。该检测方法可靠、易于操作和标准化,只需要大多数分子实验室都有的常规仪器。因此,RT-MLPA 检测为那些需要对 DLBCL、NOS 病例进行亚型鉴定的实验室提供了一种替代方法,因为它们无法使用 GEP 或其他仪器密集型方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
422
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal will cover studies related to pathology including morbid anatomy, surgical pathology, clinical pathology, diagnostic cytopathology including gynecologic cytology and aspiration cytology, hematology including immuno-hematology and medical microbiology. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, letters to the editor and brief communications. Review articles on current topics usually are invited by the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信