Análise da produção científica brasileira sobre fluxos de informação

IF 0.1 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Danielly Oliveira Inomata, Wánderson Cássio Oliveira Araújo, Ketry Gorete Farias dos Passos, Gregório Jean Varvakis Rados
{"title":"Análise da produção científica brasileira sobre fluxos de informação","authors":"Danielly Oliveira Inomata, Wánderson Cássio Oliveira Araújo, Ketry Gorete Farias dos Passos, Gregório Jean Varvakis Rados","doi":"10.5195/BIBLIOS.2015.209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. This paper presents and discuss the concepts, contexts and applications involving information flows in organizations. Method. Systematic review, followed by a bibliometric analysis and system analysis. The systematic review aimed to search for, evaluate and review evidence about the research topic. The systematic review process comprised the following steps: 1) definition of keywords, 2) systematic review, 3) exploration and analysis of articles and 4) comparison and consolidation of results. Results. A bibliometric analysis aimed to provide a statement of the relevance of articles where the authors, dates of publications, citation index, and periodic keywords with higher occurrence. Conclusions. As survey results confirms the emphasis on information featured in the knowledge management process, and advancing years, it seems that the emphasis is on networks, ie, studies are turning to the operationalization and analysis of flows information networks. The literature produced demonstrates the relationship of information flow with its management, applied to different organizationa l contexts, including showing new trends in information science as the study and analysis of information flow in networks.","PeriodicalId":42369,"journal":{"name":"Biblios-Revista de Bibliotecologia y Ciencias de la Informacion","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biblios-Revista de Bibliotecologia y Ciencias de la Informacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/BIBLIOS.2015.209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective. This paper presents and discuss the concepts, contexts and applications involving information flows in organizations. Method. Systematic review, followed by a bibliometric analysis and system analysis. The systematic review aimed to search for, evaluate and review evidence about the research topic. The systematic review process comprised the following steps: 1) definition of keywords, 2) systematic review, 3) exploration and analysis of articles and 4) comparison and consolidation of results. Results. A bibliometric analysis aimed to provide a statement of the relevance of articles where the authors, dates of publications, citation index, and periodic keywords with higher occurrence. Conclusions. As survey results confirms the emphasis on information featured in the knowledge management process, and advancing years, it seems that the emphasis is on networks, ie, studies are turning to the operationalization and analysis of flows information networks. The literature produced demonstrates the relationship of information flow with its management, applied to different organizationa l contexts, including showing new trends in information science as the study and analysis of information flow in networks.
分析巴西关于信息流的科学成果
目标。本文介绍并讨论了组织中涉及信息流的概念、背景和应用。方法。系统评价,其次是文献计量分析和系统分析。系统评价的目的是寻找、评价和回顾有关研究课题的证据。系统综述过程包括以下几个步骤:1)关键词的定义,2)系统综述,3)文章的探索与分析,4)结果的比较与整合。结果。文献计量学分析旨在提供文章相关性的声明,其中作者、出版日期、引文索引和周期性关键词出现频率较高。结论。调查结果证实了知识管理过程中对信息的强调,随着时间的推移,似乎强调的是网络,即研究转向流动信息网络的操作化和分析。所产生的文献展示了信息流与其管理的关系,并应用于不同的组织环境,包括展示了信息科学的新趋势,如研究和分析网络中的信息流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信