Prolonged Treatment with Free Fatty Acids has Post Receptor Effect in Hepatic Insulin Resistance: Evidence that Fatty Acids, Oleate and Palmitate have Insignificant Effect on the Insulin Receptor Beta In Vivo and Ex Vivo primary Hepatocytes

R. Ragheb, A. Medhat, G. Shanab, D. Seoudi, I. G. Fantus
{"title":"Prolonged Treatment with Free Fatty Acids has Post Receptor Effect in Hepatic Insulin Resistance: Evidence that Fatty Acids, Oleate and Palmitate have Insignificant Effect on the Insulin Receptor Beta In Vivo and Ex Vivo primary Hepatocytes","authors":"R. Ragheb, A. Medhat, G. Shanab, D. Seoudi, I. G. Fantus","doi":"10.4137/BCI.S2850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the current study, we used immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting to examine the levels and phosphorylation status of the insulin receptor-beta subunit (IR-β), as well as the down stream target in PI3K pathway, total PKB/Akt as well as their phosphorylated forms. The assessment of FFAs treatment showed no direct and significant effect on the PI3K stimulation, specifically the IR-β in primary hepatic control cells treated with insulin. Cells treated with either oleate or palmitate (360 μM) showed no statistically significant values following insulin stimulation (P > 0.05). To further investigate the effect of both FFAs and high insulin (1 μg), we examined the effects of oleate and palmitate at 360 μM concentration on IR-β as well as PKB. There was no significant difference in the total protein levels and their phosphorylated forms in cells treated with or without oleate or plamitate. Interestingly, IR-β tyrosine phosphorylation showed a similar insignificant effect in vivo and ex vivo hepatic cells treated with oleate or palmitate in comparison to their controls in the fructose fed hamsters.","PeriodicalId":8791,"journal":{"name":"Biochemistry Insights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemistry Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4137/BCI.S2850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In the current study, we used immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting to examine the levels and phosphorylation status of the insulin receptor-beta subunit (IR-β), as well as the down stream target in PI3K pathway, total PKB/Akt as well as their phosphorylated forms. The assessment of FFAs treatment showed no direct and significant effect on the PI3K stimulation, specifically the IR-β in primary hepatic control cells treated with insulin. Cells treated with either oleate or palmitate (360 μM) showed no statistically significant values following insulin stimulation (P > 0.05). To further investigate the effect of both FFAs and high insulin (1 μg), we examined the effects of oleate and palmitate at 360 μM concentration on IR-β as well as PKB. There was no significant difference in the total protein levels and their phosphorylated forms in cells treated with or without oleate or plamitate. Interestingly, IR-β tyrosine phosphorylation showed a similar insignificant effect in vivo and ex vivo hepatic cells treated with oleate or palmitate in comparison to their controls in the fructose fed hamsters.
游离脂肪酸长期治疗对肝脏胰岛素抵抗具有受体后效应:脂肪酸、油酸和棕榈酸酯对体内和离体原代肝细胞胰岛素受体β影响不显著的证据
在本研究中,我们使用免疫沉淀和免疫印迹技术检测胰岛素受体-β亚基(IR-β)的水平和磷酸化状态,以及PI3K途径的下游靶标、总PKB/Akt及其磷酸化形式。评估结果显示,FFAs治疗对胰岛素处理的原代肝对照细胞的PI3K刺激,特别是IR-β没有直接和显著的影响。用油酸盐或棕榈酸盐(360 μM)处理的细胞在胰岛素刺激后无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。为了进一步研究FFAs和高胰岛素(1 μg)的作用,我们检测了360 μM浓度的油酸盐和棕榈酸盐对IR-β和PKB的影响。在有或没有油酸或板质处理的细胞中,总蛋白水平及其磷酸化形式没有显著差异。有趣的是,与果糖喂养的仓鼠相比,IR-β酪氨酸磷酸化在油酸盐或棕榈酸盐处理的体内和体外肝细胞中显示出类似的不显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biochemistry Insights
Biochemistry Insights BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信