Splint efficacy in chronic post-stroke spasticity-pilot study

Q3 Health Professions
B. Onder, B. Selçuk, A. Atcı, A. Kurtaran, M. Akyuz
{"title":"Splint efficacy in chronic post-stroke spasticity-pilot study","authors":"B. Onder, B. Selçuk, A. Atcı, A. Kurtaran, M. Akyuz","doi":"10.5114/pq.2021.108667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Hand spasticity after stroke is a serious issue and may lead to hygiene problems, range of motion limitations, or contractures. Hand splints are often used to reduce spasticity and prevent movement limitations; however, there is little research available on the efficacy of splints in spasticity. The study aimed to investigate the efficacy of a reflex inhibitory splint (RiS) for upper extremity spasticity in stroke patients by using clinical and electrophysiological studies. Methods. Stroke patients with elbow and hand spasticity were allocated into 2 groups. The splint group ( n = 16) wore RiS. The control group ( n = 13) did not wear any upper extremity splint. Both groups received the same rehabilitation program during this period. They were evaluated for motion in the upper extremity with the Brunnstrom scale and Fugl-Meyer upper extremity scale. Electrophysiological measurements showing motor neuron excitability such as the ratio between the maximum amplitude of H-reflex and the maximum amplitude of M-response (H max /M max ratio), H-reflex latency, and F-wave persistence and latency were also studied. All clinical and electrophysiological measurements were performed in both groups on days 0 and 15. Results. At the end of the treatment, elbow and finger flexion tonus decreased and active wrist extension angle increased in the splint treatment group compared with both baseline and the control group. Compared with the pre-treatment status, a correlation was detected between the H max /M max ratio and the wrist flexion tonus in the splint group. Conclusions. RiS may be useful for the management of post-stroke upper-limb spasticity.","PeriodicalId":37315,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pq.2021.108667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Hand spasticity after stroke is a serious issue and may lead to hygiene problems, range of motion limitations, or contractures. Hand splints are often used to reduce spasticity and prevent movement limitations; however, there is little research available on the efficacy of splints in spasticity. The study aimed to investigate the efficacy of a reflex inhibitory splint (RiS) for upper extremity spasticity in stroke patients by using clinical and electrophysiological studies. Methods. Stroke patients with elbow and hand spasticity were allocated into 2 groups. The splint group ( n = 16) wore RiS. The control group ( n = 13) did not wear any upper extremity splint. Both groups received the same rehabilitation program during this period. They were evaluated for motion in the upper extremity with the Brunnstrom scale and Fugl-Meyer upper extremity scale. Electrophysiological measurements showing motor neuron excitability such as the ratio between the maximum amplitude of H-reflex and the maximum amplitude of M-response (H max /M max ratio), H-reflex latency, and F-wave persistence and latency were also studied. All clinical and electrophysiological measurements were performed in both groups on days 0 and 15. Results. At the end of the treatment, elbow and finger flexion tonus decreased and active wrist extension angle increased in the splint treatment group compared with both baseline and the control group. Compared with the pre-treatment status, a correlation was detected between the H max /M max ratio and the wrist flexion tonus in the splint group. Conclusions. RiS may be useful for the management of post-stroke upper-limb spasticity.
夹板对慢性脑卒中后痉挛的疗效-初步研究
介绍。中风后的手部痉挛是一个严重的问题,可能导致卫生问题、活动范围限制或挛缩。手部夹板常用于减少痉挛和防止活动限制;然而,关于夹板治疗痉挛的有效性的研究很少。本研究旨在通过临床和电生理研究探讨反射抑制夹板(RiS)治疗脑卒中患者上肢痉挛的疗效。方法。脑卒中伴手肘痉挛患者分为两组。夹板组(n = 16)佩戴RiS。对照组(n = 13)不佩戴任何上肢夹板。在此期间,两组都接受了相同的康复计划。采用Brunnstrom量表和Fugl-Meyer上肢量表评估上肢运动。我们还研究了显示运动神经元兴奋性的电生理测量,如H反射的最大振幅与M反应的最大振幅之比(H max /M max比值)、H反射潜伏期、f波持续时间和潜伏期。两组均于第0天和第15天进行临床和电生理检查。结果。治疗结束时,与基线和对照组相比,夹板治疗组肘关节和手指屈曲张力减少,手腕主动伸角增加。与治疗前比较,夹板组hmax / mmax比值与腕屈曲张力呈正相关。结论。RiS可能对中风后上肢痉挛的治疗有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiotherapy Quarterly
Physiotherapy Quarterly Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiotherapy Quarterly ISSN 2544-4395 (formerly Fizjoterapia ISSN 1230-8323) is an international scientific peer-reviewed journal, published in both paper and electronic format by the University School of Physical Education in Wroclaw, Poland. The original version of the journal is its paper issue. The Editorial Office accepts original papers on various aspects of physiotherapy and rehabilitation for publication. Manuscripts in basic science and clinical physiotherapy science are published at the highest priority. Letters to the Editor, reports from scientific meetings and book reviews are also considered. Physiotherapy Quarterly publishes papers that show depth, rigor, originality and high-quality presentation. The scope of the journal: evidence-based rehabilitation; the mechanisms of function or dysfunction; modern therapy methods; best clinical practice; clinical reasoning and decision-making processes; assessment and clinical management of disorders; exploration of relevant clinical interventions; multi-modal approaches; psychosocial issues; expectations, experiences, and perspectives of physiotherapists. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research articles are welcomed, together with systematic and high-quality narrative reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信