Wojciech Łężak, Ł. Mokros, J. Kaźmierski, D. Strzelecki, H. Jerczyńska, E. Kowalczyk, T. Pietras
{"title":"Can irisin become a biomarker of physical activity, or another metabolic risk assessment parameter, in psychiatric care patients?","authors":"Wojciech Łężak, Ł. Mokros, J. Kaźmierski, D. Strzelecki, H. Jerczyńska, E. Kowalczyk, T. Pietras","doi":"10.5114/PPN.2020.103632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Physical activity (PA) is considered to be a major preventive factor in psychopharmacotherapy-induced metabolic adverse effects, such as metabolic syndrome induction. The recent discovery of irisin might bring a potential tool with which to supervise patient compliance or create an additional metabolic risk assessment parameter. Methods: The sample consisted of 66 inand out-patients of a Polish hospital. Irisin serum concentrations were measured using commercially available ELISA kits. Sociodemographic and clinical data were obtained from medical records. PA sufficiency was assessed with the use of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. t-Student, c2, Fisher’s exact test, Pearson correlation and ANCOVA were used for statistical analysis. The significance level was set at α = 0.05. Results: The difference in irisin concentrations between patients with sufficient and insufficient PA was not statistically significant. Patients given second generation antipsychotic drugs exhibited lower PA and irisin concentrations than patients on antidepressant drugs or first-generation antipsychotic drugs. Additionally, irisin concentrations were lower in patients with central obesity compared to patients without it. Conlusions: Irisin does not appear to be a valid, objective tool for the evaluation of patients. However, significant associations between irisin concentrations, psychopharmacotherapy and metabolic parameters were found.","PeriodicalId":39142,"journal":{"name":"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/PPN.2020.103632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Physical activity (PA) is considered to be a major preventive factor in psychopharmacotherapy-induced metabolic adverse effects, such as metabolic syndrome induction. The recent discovery of irisin might bring a potential tool with which to supervise patient compliance or create an additional metabolic risk assessment parameter. Methods: The sample consisted of 66 inand out-patients of a Polish hospital. Irisin serum concentrations were measured using commercially available ELISA kits. Sociodemographic and clinical data were obtained from medical records. PA sufficiency was assessed with the use of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. t-Student, c2, Fisher’s exact test, Pearson correlation and ANCOVA were used for statistical analysis. The significance level was set at α = 0.05. Results: The difference in irisin concentrations between patients with sufficient and insufficient PA was not statistically significant. Patients given second generation antipsychotic drugs exhibited lower PA and irisin concentrations than patients on antidepressant drugs or first-generation antipsychotic drugs. Additionally, irisin concentrations were lower in patients with central obesity compared to patients without it. Conlusions: Irisin does not appear to be a valid, objective tool for the evaluation of patients. However, significant associations between irisin concentrations, psychopharmacotherapy and metabolic parameters were found.
期刊介绍:
The quarterly Advances in Psychiatry and Neurology is aimed at psychiatrists, neurologists as well as scientists working in related areas of basic and clinical research, psychology, social sciences and humanities. The journal publishes original papers, review articles, case reports, and - at the initiative of the Editorial Board – reflections or experiences on currently vivid theoretical and practical questions or controversies. Articles submitted to the journal are evaluated first by the Section Editors, specialists in the fields of psychiatry, clinical psychology, science of the brain and mind and neurology, and reviewed by acknowledged authorities in the respective field. Authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other.