A drug-resistant recurrence of the primary illness or a persistent withdrawal syndrome? “Mirror” symptoms in patients in long-term treatment with benzodiazepines

IF 0.7 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Anna Basińska-Szafrańska
{"title":"A drug-resistant recurrence of the primary illness or a persistent withdrawal syndrome? “Mirror” symptoms in patients in long-term treatment with benzodiazepines","authors":"Anna Basińska-Szafrańska","doi":"10.5114/ppn.2019.89138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: In benzodiazepine (BZD) iatrogenic addiction, doses often run behind the growing level of the patient’s need. This creates experience of deficiency (withdrawal) symptoms, despite continued drug intake. As mirror reflections (negatives) of all the therapeutic actions of the drug, they mimic the original ailment, with extra symptoms. Despite observed resistance to standard treatment and responsiveness exclusively to BZD, these may be misinterpreted as a genuine malady, which dooms the outcome. Such mistakes need to be prevented. Case description: Two patients who began taking BZD to treat anxiety (female) and stress (male), over time became disability pensioners for “drug-resistant” anxiety disorders and “drug-resistant” somatic complaints. These ineffective treatments lasted until the dependence scenario was recognised. Proper treatment (detoxification) eliminated symptoms or made them responsive to standard treatment. Comment: Treating the “mirror” symptoms as a drug-resistant, genuine malady (or new diseases) worsens the patient’s condition and prognosis. Proper identification of the origin of a growing set of symptoms may result in a spectacular improvement.","PeriodicalId":39142,"journal":{"name":"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5114/ppn.2019.89138","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ppn.2019.89138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In benzodiazepine (BZD) iatrogenic addiction, doses often run behind the growing level of the patient’s need. This creates experience of deficiency (withdrawal) symptoms, despite continued drug intake. As mirror reflections (negatives) of all the therapeutic actions of the drug, they mimic the original ailment, with extra symptoms. Despite observed resistance to standard treatment and responsiveness exclusively to BZD, these may be misinterpreted as a genuine malady, which dooms the outcome. Such mistakes need to be prevented. Case description: Two patients who began taking BZD to treat anxiety (female) and stress (male), over time became disability pensioners for “drug-resistant” anxiety disorders and “drug-resistant” somatic complaints. These ineffective treatments lasted until the dependence scenario was recognised. Proper treatment (detoxification) eliminated symptoms or made them responsive to standard treatment. Comment: Treating the “mirror” symptoms as a drug-resistant, genuine malady (or new diseases) worsens the patient’s condition and prognosis. Proper identification of the origin of a growing set of symptoms may result in a spectacular improvement.
是原发疾病的耐药复发还是持续性戒断综合征?长期服用苯二氮卓类药物患者的“镜像”症状
目的:在苯二氮卓类药物(BZD)医源性成瘾中,剂量往往落后于患者需求的增长水平。这就产生了缺乏(戒断)症状的经历,尽管继续服用药物。作为药物所有治疗作用的镜像反射(阴性),它们模仿原始疾病,并伴有额外的症状。尽管观察到对标准治疗的耐药性和仅对BZD的反应性,但这些可能被误解为真正的疾病,从而注定了结果。这类错误需要加以防止。病例描述:两名开始服用BZD治疗焦虑(女)和压力(男)的患者,随着时间的推移,因“耐药”焦虑症和“耐药”躯体疾病而成为残疾养老金领取者。这些无效的治疗一直持续到人们认识到这种依赖性。适当的治疗(排毒)可消除症状或使其对标准治疗有反应。评论:将“镜像”症状视为耐药、真正的疾病(或新疾病)会恶化患者的病情和预后。正确识别越来越多的症状的来源可能会导致显著的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii
Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The quarterly Advances in Psychiatry and Neurology is aimed at psychiatrists, neurologists as well as scientists working in related areas of basic and clinical research, psychology, social sciences and humanities. The journal publishes original papers, review articles, case reports, and - at the initiative of the Editorial Board – reflections or experiences on currently vivid theoretical and practical questions or controversies. Articles submitted to the journal are evaluated first by the Section Editors, specialists in the fields of psychiatry, clinical psychology, science of the brain and mind and neurology, and reviewed by acknowledged authorities in the respective field. Authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信