Reflective-ruminative tendencies and coping flexibility in patients with non-specific inflammatory bowel diseases

IF 0.7 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
M. Basińska, Sandra Przyborowska-Stankiewicz, Agnieszka Kruczek, A. Liebert
{"title":"Reflective-ruminative tendencies and coping flexibility in patients with non-specific inflammatory bowel diseases","authors":"M. Basińska, Sandra Przyborowska-Stankiewicz, Agnieszka Kruczek, A. Liebert","doi":"10.5114/PPN.2019.86254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The question concerning coping competencies among other factors that improve quality of life of the chronically ill seems to be of particular importance. The aim of the study was to examine how private self-awareness defined in terms of rumination and reflection processes is related to flexibility both in thinking and coping as pivotal elements of adaptation to chronic illness. Methods: Participants in the study were 100 patients with non-specific inflammatory bowel diseases (Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis). The following instruments were used: the Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire (RRQ) by Paul D. Trapnell and Jennifer D. Campbell, the Cognitive Flexibility Questionnaire by John P. Dennis and Jillon S. Vander Wal, the Flexibility in Coping with Stress Questionnaire by Małgorzata A. Basińska and collaborators, the Short Self-Assessment of Depression and Anxiety by Andrzej Kokoszka, and a sociodemographic questionnaire developed by the present authors. Results: Ruminative tendencies were found to correlate negatively with a single dimension of cognitive flexibility, i.e. sense of control, and with a single dimension of coping flexibility, i.e. repertoire of coping strategies. Both these relationships were strengthened by the presence of self-assessed depression symptoms (the former), and self-assessed anxiety (the latter). The significance of reflective tendencies for flexi- bility was limited to a simple relationship with the dimensions of alternatives, variability and reflectiveness. Conclusions: In the work with people suffering from non-specific inflammatory bowel conditions it is important to reduce the pa- tients’ ruminative tendencies and monitor their anxiety and depression symptoms. If such symptoms are persistent, appropriate interventions seem to be equally important. H2: Relationships of ruminative and reflective tendencies with cognitive flexibility and coping flexibility are mediated by depression and anxiety.","PeriodicalId":39142,"journal":{"name":"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5114/PPN.2019.86254","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/PPN.2019.86254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: The question concerning coping competencies among other factors that improve quality of life of the chronically ill seems to be of particular importance. The aim of the study was to examine how private self-awareness defined in terms of rumination and reflection processes is related to flexibility both in thinking and coping as pivotal elements of adaptation to chronic illness. Methods: Participants in the study were 100 patients with non-specific inflammatory bowel diseases (Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis). The following instruments were used: the Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire (RRQ) by Paul D. Trapnell and Jennifer D. Campbell, the Cognitive Flexibility Questionnaire by John P. Dennis and Jillon S. Vander Wal, the Flexibility in Coping with Stress Questionnaire by Małgorzata A. Basińska and collaborators, the Short Self-Assessment of Depression and Anxiety by Andrzej Kokoszka, and a sociodemographic questionnaire developed by the present authors. Results: Ruminative tendencies were found to correlate negatively with a single dimension of cognitive flexibility, i.e. sense of control, and with a single dimension of coping flexibility, i.e. repertoire of coping strategies. Both these relationships were strengthened by the presence of self-assessed depression symptoms (the former), and self-assessed anxiety (the latter). The significance of reflective tendencies for flexi- bility was limited to a simple relationship with the dimensions of alternatives, variability and reflectiveness. Conclusions: In the work with people suffering from non-specific inflammatory bowel conditions it is important to reduce the pa- tients’ ruminative tendencies and monitor their anxiety and depression symptoms. If such symptoms are persistent, appropriate interventions seem to be equally important. H2: Relationships of ruminative and reflective tendencies with cognitive flexibility and coping flexibility are mediated by depression and anxiety.
非特异性炎性肠病患者的反思反刍倾向和应对灵活性
目的:在改善慢性病患者生活质量的其他因素中,有关应对能力的问题似乎特别重要。这项研究的目的是为了研究在反思和反思过程中定义的私人自我意识是如何与思维和应对的灵活性相关的,这是适应慢性疾病的关键因素。方法:研究对象为100例非特异性炎症性肠病(克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎)患者。本研究使用了以下工具:Paul D. Trapnell和Jennifer D. Campbell的反思性问卷(RRQ), John P. Dennis和Jillon S. Vander Wal的认知灵活性问卷,Małgorzata a . Basińska及其合作者的应对压力灵活性问卷,Andrzej Kokoszka的抑郁和焦虑短期自我评估问卷,以及本作者开发的社会人口调查问卷。结果:反刍倾向与认知灵活性的单一维度(控制感)和应对灵活性的单一维度(应对策略库)呈负相关。自我评估的抑郁症状(前者)和自我评估的焦虑(后者)的存在加强了这两种关系。反思倾向对灵活性的意义仅限于与可选择性、可变性和反思性的维度之间的简单关系。结论:在非特异性炎症性肠病患者的工作中,减少患者的反刍倾向和监测他们的焦虑和抑郁症状是重要的。如果这些症状持续存在,适当的干预措施似乎同样重要。H2:抑郁和焦虑介导了反刍和反思倾向与认知灵活性和应对灵活性的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii
Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The quarterly Advances in Psychiatry and Neurology is aimed at psychiatrists, neurologists as well as scientists working in related areas of basic and clinical research, psychology, social sciences and humanities. The journal publishes original papers, review articles, case reports, and - at the initiative of the Editorial Board – reflections or experiences on currently vivid theoretical and practical questions or controversies. Articles submitted to the journal are evaluated first by the Section Editors, specialists in the fields of psychiatry, clinical psychology, science of the brain and mind and neurology, and reviewed by acknowledged authorities in the respective field. Authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信