Dynamics of neurocognitive change in patients with mild cognitive impairment

IF 0.7 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Magdalena Gugała-Iwaniuk, E. Łojek, W. Lipczyńska-Łojkowska, B. Sawicka, A. Bochyńska, R. Poniatowska, W. Lechowicz, H. Sienkiewicz-Jarosz
{"title":"Dynamics of neurocognitive change in patients with mild cognitive impairment","authors":"Magdalena Gugała-Iwaniuk, E. Łojek, W. Lipczyńska-Łojkowska, B. Sawicka, A. Bochyńska, R. Poniatowska, W. Lechowicz, H. Sienkiewicz-Jarosz","doi":"10.5114/PPN.2019.86253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To examine the dynamics and cognitive indicators of neuropsychological change in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Methods: A total of 50 patients with MCI diagnosis and a control group of 33 healthy people took part in the study. A multidomain cognitive battery was administered and the volume of both regions of the hippocampus were measured using magnetic resonance imaging. Two assessments were made at a 24 month interval. According to the dynamics of global cognitive decline in two years the MCI patients were divided into stable (sMCI) and deteriorating (dMCI) groups. The three groups were comparable in terms of demographic variables and emotional state. Results: At baseline there was no significant difference between MCI groups on the level of the General Cognitive Functioning Index (GFI); however, the dMCI patients made significantly more errors in their performance. Hippocampal volumes were also similar in the MCI groups. After two years, the dMCI patients showed significant decline in the GFI and verbal memory as compared with the remaining groups. Hippocampal volumes significantly decreased in both MCI groups. There was a moderate relationship between the change in cognitive state and the change in left hippocampal volumetry in the MCI group as a whole (r = 0.4). Cognitive factors of inaccurate recall and perseverations differentiated the sMCI and dMCI patients at baseline (p = 0.04 and p = 0.01, respectively). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that neuropsychological indicators of verbal memory functions and executive aspects of memory seem to have a significant value in predicting cognitive deterioration in MCI patients.","PeriodicalId":39142,"journal":{"name":"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5114/PPN.2019.86253","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/PPN.2019.86253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the dynamics and cognitive indicators of neuropsychological change in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Methods: A total of 50 patients with MCI diagnosis and a control group of 33 healthy people took part in the study. A multidomain cognitive battery was administered and the volume of both regions of the hippocampus were measured using magnetic resonance imaging. Two assessments were made at a 24 month interval. According to the dynamics of global cognitive decline in two years the MCI patients were divided into stable (sMCI) and deteriorating (dMCI) groups. The three groups were comparable in terms of demographic variables and emotional state. Results: At baseline there was no significant difference between MCI groups on the level of the General Cognitive Functioning Index (GFI); however, the dMCI patients made significantly more errors in their performance. Hippocampal volumes were also similar in the MCI groups. After two years, the dMCI patients showed significant decline in the GFI and verbal memory as compared with the remaining groups. Hippocampal volumes significantly decreased in both MCI groups. There was a moderate relationship between the change in cognitive state and the change in left hippocampal volumetry in the MCI group as a whole (r = 0.4). Cognitive factors of inaccurate recall and perseverations differentiated the sMCI and dMCI patients at baseline (p = 0.04 and p = 0.01, respectively). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that neuropsychological indicators of verbal memory functions and executive aspects of memory seem to have a significant value in predicting cognitive deterioration in MCI patients.
轻度认知障碍患者神经认知变化的动态
目的:探讨轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者神经心理变化的动态和认知指标。方法:50例轻度认知障碍患者和33名健康对照者参与研究。使用多域认知电池,并使用磁共振成像测量海马两个区域的体积。每隔24个月进行两次评估。根据两年内整体认知能力下降的动态将MCI患者分为稳定组(sMCI)和恶化组(dMCI)。这三组在人口统计变量和情绪状态方面具有可比性。结果:在基线时,MCI组间一般认知功能指数(GFI)水平无显著差异;然而,dMCI患者在表现上的错误明显更多。MCI组的海马体积也相似。两年后,与其他组相比,dMCI患者的GFI和言语记忆明显下降。两个MCI组海马体积均显著减少。MCI组整体认知状态变化与左海马体积变化呈中度相关(r = 0.4)。不准确回忆和坚持的认知因素在基线时对sMCI和dMCI患者有差异(p = 0.04和p = 0.01)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,言语记忆功能和记忆执行方面的神经心理学指标似乎在预测MCI患者的认知退化方面具有重要价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii
Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The quarterly Advances in Psychiatry and Neurology is aimed at psychiatrists, neurologists as well as scientists working in related areas of basic and clinical research, psychology, social sciences and humanities. The journal publishes original papers, review articles, case reports, and - at the initiative of the Editorial Board – reflections or experiences on currently vivid theoretical and practical questions or controversies. Articles submitted to the journal are evaluated first by the Section Editors, specialists in the fields of psychiatry, clinical psychology, science of the brain and mind and neurology, and reviewed by acknowledged authorities in the respective field. Authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信