Modified Stroop test in psychological diagnosis of pedophilia. a systematic review

IF 0.7 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
W. Oronowicz-Jaśkowiak, M. Lew-Starowicz
{"title":"Modified Stroop test in psychological diagnosis of pedophilia. a systematic review","authors":"W. Oronowicz-Jaśkowiak, M. Lew-Starowicz","doi":"10.5114/PPN.2019.84355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: A systematic review of literature was conducted in order to characterize the modified Stroop test in the psychological diagnosis of pedophilia. Views: Clinicians’ testing for sexual preferences, both at the request of the patient and for sexual jurisprudence, lack objective diagnostic tools that have been scientifically verified. In the literature, tasks based on response time are presented, as they allow an indirect conclusion to be made on the presence of pedophilic preferences. These tasks include the Stroop test on emotions. It is indicated that in the future the test may facilitate the diagnostic process conducted for sexual jurisprudence. It has been repeatedly shown that persons who have committed sexual crimes against children have a longer response time when presented stimuli associated with children. The results suggest statistically significant differences in response times between sexual offenders and control groups. In a sexual offender group, a longer response time for sexual stimuli is noted, moreover; sexual offenders against children present a longer response time for words associated with children. Conclusions: The emotional Stroop test can be regarded as a promising diagnostic tool, with further research necessary for the normalization assessment that will enable the test to be used in clinical practice. A significant limitation of the studies analyzed here is their lack of differentiation between persons with diagnosed pedophilic disorder and other offenders. The introduction of such differentiation may enable us in the future to refine the diagnostic process for sexual jurisprudence of sexual offenders against minors.","PeriodicalId":39142,"journal":{"name":"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5114/PPN.2019.84355","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/PPN.2019.84355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: A systematic review of literature was conducted in order to characterize the modified Stroop test in the psychological diagnosis of pedophilia. Views: Clinicians’ testing for sexual preferences, both at the request of the patient and for sexual jurisprudence, lack objective diagnostic tools that have been scientifically verified. In the literature, tasks based on response time are presented, as they allow an indirect conclusion to be made on the presence of pedophilic preferences. These tasks include the Stroop test on emotions. It is indicated that in the future the test may facilitate the diagnostic process conducted for sexual jurisprudence. It has been repeatedly shown that persons who have committed sexual crimes against children have a longer response time when presented stimuli associated with children. The results suggest statistically significant differences in response times between sexual offenders and control groups. In a sexual offender group, a longer response time for sexual stimuli is noted, moreover; sexual offenders against children present a longer response time for words associated with children. Conclusions: The emotional Stroop test can be regarded as a promising diagnostic tool, with further research necessary for the normalization assessment that will enable the test to be used in clinical practice. A significant limitation of the studies analyzed here is their lack of differentiation between persons with diagnosed pedophilic disorder and other offenders. The introduction of such differentiation may enable us in the future to refine the diagnostic process for sexual jurisprudence of sexual offenders against minors.
修正Stroop测验在恋童癖心理诊断中的应用。系统回顾
目的:对修正Stroop测验在恋童癖心理诊断中的应用进行系统的文献回顾。观点:临床医生对性偏好的测试,无论是应患者的要求还是出于性法学的考虑,都缺乏经过科学验证的客观诊断工具。在文献中,提出了基于反应时间的任务,因为它们允许对恋童癖偏好的存在做出间接结论。这些任务包括关于情绪的Stroop测试。这表明,在未来的测试可能有助于诊断过程进行的性法理学。研究一再表明,对儿童实施性犯罪的人在面对与儿童有关的刺激时反应时间较长。结果显示,性犯罪者和控制组在反应时间上存在统计学上的显著差异。此外,在性犯罪者群体中,对性刺激的反应时间更长;针对儿童的性犯罪者对儿童相关词汇的反应时间更长。结论:情绪Stroop测试是一种很有前景的诊断工具,但需要进一步的研究来进行规范化评估,使该测试能够在临床实践中使用。这里分析的研究的一个显著的局限性是,他们缺乏对诊断为恋童癖障碍的人和其他犯罪者的区分。引入这种区分可以使我们在未来完善针对未成年人的性犯罪者的性法理学诊断过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii
Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The quarterly Advances in Psychiatry and Neurology is aimed at psychiatrists, neurologists as well as scientists working in related areas of basic and clinical research, psychology, social sciences and humanities. The journal publishes original papers, review articles, case reports, and - at the initiative of the Editorial Board – reflections or experiences on currently vivid theoretical and practical questions or controversies. Articles submitted to the journal are evaluated first by the Section Editors, specialists in the fields of psychiatry, clinical psychology, science of the brain and mind and neurology, and reviewed by acknowledged authorities in the respective field. Authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信