Personality and posttraumatic stress symptoms in oncological patients – the mediating role of ruminations

IF 0.7 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
N. Ogińska-Bulik
{"title":"Personality and posttraumatic stress symptoms in oncological patients – the mediating role of ruminations","authors":"N. Ogińska-Bulik","doi":"10.5114/PPN.2018.77209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Cognitive activity, including event-related ruminations and personality features play an essential role in the occurrence of negative outcomes of experienced traumatic events. The study investigated the role of ruminations, treated both in terms of stable disposition (trait-like rumination) and about the event in the relationship between personality dimensions and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Methods: Sixty people, aged 18–78 years (M = 50.4, SD = 17.74), who had experienced malignant tumours in the craniofacial area were examined. The majority of respondents (68.3%) were women. The Impact of Event Scale-Revised, the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI), the Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire (RRQ) and the Event Related Rumination Inventory (ERRI) were used in the study. Results: The majority of respondents, i.e. 76.7%, reported moderate or severe PTSD symptoms. Low levels of these symptoms were observed only in 23.3% of the subjects. The only dimension of personality associated with the severity of PTSD symptoms was neuroticism. It plays a predictive role for dispositional ruminating and for the intrusive ruminations of an experienced event. In turn, this type of ruminations is conducive to the occurrence of PTSD symptoms. The conducted multiple mediation analysis (double mediation model) indicated the significance of intrusive ruminations as a factor favouring the intensity of the PTSD symptoms. Conclusions: Ruminations seem to play a more important role in the occurrence of PTSD symptoms than personality traits. Ruminations about the experienced situation are more significant than trait-like rumination for the occurrence of these symptoms.","PeriodicalId":39142,"journal":{"name":"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5114/PPN.2018.77209","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/PPN.2018.77209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: Cognitive activity, including event-related ruminations and personality features play an essential role in the occurrence of negative outcomes of experienced traumatic events. The study investigated the role of ruminations, treated both in terms of stable disposition (trait-like rumination) and about the event in the relationship between personality dimensions and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Methods: Sixty people, aged 18–78 years (M = 50.4, SD = 17.74), who had experienced malignant tumours in the craniofacial area were examined. The majority of respondents (68.3%) were women. The Impact of Event Scale-Revised, the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI), the Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire (RRQ) and the Event Related Rumination Inventory (ERRI) were used in the study. Results: The majority of respondents, i.e. 76.7%, reported moderate or severe PTSD symptoms. Low levels of these symptoms were observed only in 23.3% of the subjects. The only dimension of personality associated with the severity of PTSD symptoms was neuroticism. It plays a predictive role for dispositional ruminating and for the intrusive ruminations of an experienced event. In turn, this type of ruminations is conducive to the occurrence of PTSD symptoms. The conducted multiple mediation analysis (double mediation model) indicated the significance of intrusive ruminations as a factor favouring the intensity of the PTSD symptoms. Conclusions: Ruminations seem to play a more important role in the occurrence of PTSD symptoms than personality traits. Ruminations about the experienced situation are more significant than trait-like rumination for the occurrence of these symptoms.
肿瘤患者的人格和创伤后应激症状——反刍的中介作用
目的:认知活动,包括事件相关的反刍和人格特征,在经历创伤性事件负面结果的发生中起着至关重要的作用。该研究调查了反刍的作用,从稳定的性格(类似特质的反刍)和人格维度与创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)之间的关系两方面进行了研究。方法:对60例颅面恶性肿瘤患者进行检查,年龄18 ~ 78岁(M = 50.4, SD = 17.74)。大多数受访者(68.3%)是女性。采用事件影响量表、NEO五因子量表(NEO- ffi)、反刍反思问卷(RRQ)和事件相关反刍问卷(ERRI)进行研究。结果:大多数受访者(76.7%)报告有中度或重度PTSD症状。只有23.3%的受试者出现低水平的这些症状。与创伤后应激障碍症状严重程度相关的唯一人格维度是神经质。它对性格反刍和对经历事件的侵入性反刍起着预测作用。反过来,这种类型的沉思有利于PTSD症状的发生。多重中介分析(双中介模型)表明侵入性反刍是影响PTSD症状强度的重要因素。结论:反刍在PTSD症状的发生中似乎比人格特质起着更重要的作用。对于这些症状的发生,对经验情境的反刍比特质性反刍更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii
Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The quarterly Advances in Psychiatry and Neurology is aimed at psychiatrists, neurologists as well as scientists working in related areas of basic and clinical research, psychology, social sciences and humanities. The journal publishes original papers, review articles, case reports, and - at the initiative of the Editorial Board – reflections or experiences on currently vivid theoretical and practical questions or controversies. Articles submitted to the journal are evaluated first by the Section Editors, specialists in the fields of psychiatry, clinical psychology, science of the brain and mind and neurology, and reviewed by acknowledged authorities in the respective field. Authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信