Dialogue on the turns. Vasily Surikov and “modernism”: relationship сonflict

Q4 Social Sciences
Olga S. Davydova
{"title":"Dialogue on the turns. Vasily Surikov and “modernism”: relationship сonflict","authors":"Olga S. Davydova","doi":"10.37953/2079-0341-2021-3-1-255-270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the peculiarities of the dialogue which occurred at the turn of the 19th century between the creative searches of Surikov and the newest modernist trends in Russia: from Symbolism of the artists of the World of Art (known in Russian as Mir Iskusstva) group and the Blue Rose (Golubaya Roza) circle to the different stages of the Russian avant-garde – from the Jack of Diamonds (Bubnovy Valet) to Suprematism. The composition of the study is based on the counterpoint of two questions – how Surikov perceived “modernism” and how “modernism” perceived Surikov. The concept of “modernism” in this case is interpreted in the extended sense of the creative search to the early 20th century for unconventional art of magical and plastic means of expression that went beyond the limits of the Itinerant (Рeredvizhniki) Movement’s realism. The collision of relationships is viewed through the prism of the stable plastic and emotional features of the artistic poetics of Surikov himself. That is why the author touches the issues of the artists’s personal understanding of the nature of art and the problems of innovation, which worried him until the end of his life and found expression in the decorative, lyrical and expressive features of the late creative period.","PeriodicalId":37537,"journal":{"name":"Academia (Greece)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academia (Greece)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37953/2079-0341-2021-3-1-255-270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article deals with the peculiarities of the dialogue which occurred at the turn of the 19th century between the creative searches of Surikov and the newest modernist trends in Russia: from Symbolism of the artists of the World of Art (known in Russian as Mir Iskusstva) group and the Blue Rose (Golubaya Roza) circle to the different stages of the Russian avant-garde – from the Jack of Diamonds (Bubnovy Valet) to Suprematism. The composition of the study is based on the counterpoint of two questions – how Surikov perceived “modernism” and how “modernism” perceived Surikov. The concept of “modernism” in this case is interpreted in the extended sense of the creative search to the early 20th century for unconventional art of magical and plastic means of expression that went beyond the limits of the Itinerant (Рeredvizhniki) Movement’s realism. The collision of relationships is viewed through the prism of the stable plastic and emotional features of the artistic poetics of Surikov himself. That is why the author touches the issues of the artists’s personal understanding of the nature of art and the problems of innovation, which worried him until the end of his life and found expression in the decorative, lyrical and expressive features of the late creative period.
转弯时的对话。瓦西里·苏里科夫与“现代主义”:关系的冲突
这篇文章讨论了发生在19世纪之交的苏里科夫的创造性探索与俄罗斯最新的现代主义趋势之间的对话的特殊性:从艺术世界(在俄罗斯被称为Mir Iskusstva)团体和蓝玫瑰(Golubaya Roza)圈子的艺术家的象征主义到俄罗斯先先派的不同阶段-从钻石杰克(Bubnovy Valet)到至上主义。这项研究的组成是基于两个问题的对位——苏里科夫如何感知“现代主义”和“现代主义”如何感知苏里科夫。在这种情况下,“现代主义”的概念被解释为20世纪初对超越巡回(Рeredvizhniki)运动现实主义界限的神奇和塑性表达方式的非传统艺术的创造性探索。关系的碰撞是通过苏里科夫自己的艺术诗学的稳定的可塑性和情感特征的棱镜来观察的。这就是为什么作者触及艺术家对艺术本质的个人理解和创新问题的问题,这些问题一直困扰着他,直到他的生命结束,并在创作后期的装饰性,抒情性和表现性特征中表现出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academia (Greece)
Academia (Greece) Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: ACADEMIA encourages papers on reported research results, procedures and methodologies; theoretical analyses in Higher Education; comparative approaches and international aspects of practice and policy with a view to identifying transferable methods, systems and good practice. ACADEMIA especially wishes to focus on the social dimension of Higher Education and the relationship between University, Democracy and Labor Market.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信