Impartial representation and the extended republic: towards a comprehensive and balanced reading of the tenth federalist paper

IF 0.5 3区历史学 Q1 HISTORY

HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT Pub Date : 1991-01-01 DOI:10.4324/9781351155168-8

A. Gibson

引用次数: 34

Abstract

Since Charles Beard first focused attention upon it in 1913, the Tenth Federalist Paper has been at the centre of the debate concerning the foundations of the American republic. Specifically, there have been three primary interpretations of this document. Each corresponds to one of the three major traditions of interpretation that have dominated the study of American political thought in the twentieth century. Each also points towards and has been evoked in the service of drastically different political philosophies.

查看原文本刊更多论文

公正代表制和扩展共和国:走向对联邦党人第十篇论文的全面和平衡的解读

自从查尔斯·比尔德(Charles Beard)在1913年首次关注《联邦党人文集第十篇》以来，它一直是有关美国共和国基础的辩论的中心。具体来说，对这份文件有三种主要的解释。每一种都对应于主导二十世纪美国政治思想研究的三大解释传统之一。每一个都指向并被唤起为截然不同的政治哲学服务。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT HISTORY-

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： History of Political Thought (HPT) is a quarterly journal which was launched in 1980 to fill a genuine academic need for a forum for work in this multi-disciplinary area. Although a subject central to the study of politics and history, researchers in this field had previously to compete for publication space in journals whose intellectual centres of gravity were located in other disciplines. The journal is devoted exclusively to the historical study of political ideas and associated methodological problems. The primary focus is on research papers, with extensive book reviews and bibliographic surveys also included. All articles are refereed.