Intravenous Tocilizumab versus Standard of Care in the Treatment of Severe and Critical COVID-19-related Pneumonia: A Single-center, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Trial.

Q4 Medicine
Acta Medica Philippina Pub Date : 2024-04-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.47895/amp.vi0.6175
Eric Jason B Amante, Aileen S David-Wang, Michael L Tee, Felix Eduardo R Punzalan, John C Añonuevo, Lenora C Fernandez, Albert B Albay, John Carlo M Malabad, Fresthel Monica M Climacosa, A Nico Nahar I Pajes, Patricia Maria Gregoria M Cuaño, Marissa M Alejandría
{"title":"Intravenous Tocilizumab versus Standard of Care in the Treatment of Severe and Critical COVID-19-related Pneumonia: A Single-center, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Trial.","authors":"Eric Jason B Amante, Aileen S David-Wang, Michael L Tee, Felix Eduardo R Punzalan, John C Añonuevo, Lenora C Fernandez, Albert B Albay, John Carlo M Malabad, Fresthel Monica M Climacosa, A Nico Nahar I Pajes, Patricia Maria Gregoria M Cuaño, Marissa M Alejandría","doi":"10.47895/amp.vi0.6175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe and critical COVID-19 disease is characterized by hyperinflammation involving pro-inflammatory cytokines, particularly IL-6. Tocilizumab is a monoclonal antibody that blocks IL-6 receptors.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated the efficacy of tocilizumab in Filipino patients with severe to critical COVID-19 disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This phase 3 randomized double-blind trial, included patients hospitalized for severe or critical COVID-19 in a 1:1 ratio to receive either tocilizumab plus local standard of care or placebo plus standard of care. Patients were eligible for a repeat IV infusion within 24-48 hours if they deteriorated or did not improve. Treatment success or clinical improvement was defined as at least two categories of improvement from baseline in the WHO 7-point Ordinal Scale of patient status, in an intention-to-treat manner.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-nine (49) patients were randomized in the tocilizumab arm and 49 in the placebo arm. There was no significant difference in age, comorbidities, COVID-19 severity, need for mechanical ventilation, presence of acute respiratory distress syndrome, or biomarker levels between groups. Use of adjunctive therapy was similar between groups, with corticosteroid used in 91.8% in tocilizumab group and 81.6% in the placebo group, while remdesivir was used in 98% of participants in both groups.There was no significant difference between groups in terms of treatment success in both the intention-to-treat analysis (relative risk=1.05, 95% CI: 0.85-1.30) and per-protocol analysis (relative risk=0.98, 95% CI: 0.80 to 1.21). There was no significant difference in time to improvement of at least two categories relative to baseline on the 7-point Ordinal Scale of clinical status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of tocilizumab on top of standard of care in the management of patients with severe to critical COVID-19 did not result in significant improvement as defined by the WHO 7-point Ordinal Scale of patient status, nor in significant improvement in incidence of mechanical ventilation, incidence of ICU admission, length of ICU stay, and mortality rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":6994,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica Philippina","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11151130/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica Philippina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47895/amp.vi0.6175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Severe and critical COVID-19 disease is characterized by hyperinflammation involving pro-inflammatory cytokines, particularly IL-6. Tocilizumab is a monoclonal antibody that blocks IL-6 receptors.

Objectives: This study evaluated the efficacy of tocilizumab in Filipino patients with severe to critical COVID-19 disease.

Methods: This phase 3 randomized double-blind trial, included patients hospitalized for severe or critical COVID-19 in a 1:1 ratio to receive either tocilizumab plus local standard of care or placebo plus standard of care. Patients were eligible for a repeat IV infusion within 24-48 hours if they deteriorated or did not improve. Treatment success or clinical improvement was defined as at least two categories of improvement from baseline in the WHO 7-point Ordinal Scale of patient status, in an intention-to-treat manner.

Results: Forty-nine (49) patients were randomized in the tocilizumab arm and 49 in the placebo arm. There was no significant difference in age, comorbidities, COVID-19 severity, need for mechanical ventilation, presence of acute respiratory distress syndrome, or biomarker levels between groups. Use of adjunctive therapy was similar between groups, with corticosteroid used in 91.8% in tocilizumab group and 81.6% in the placebo group, while remdesivir was used in 98% of participants in both groups.There was no significant difference between groups in terms of treatment success in both the intention-to-treat analysis (relative risk=1.05, 95% CI: 0.85-1.30) and per-protocol analysis (relative risk=0.98, 95% CI: 0.80 to 1.21). There was no significant difference in time to improvement of at least two categories relative to baseline on the 7-point Ordinal Scale of clinical status.

Conclusion: The use of tocilizumab on top of standard of care in the management of patients with severe to critical COVID-19 did not result in significant improvement as defined by the WHO 7-point Ordinal Scale of patient status, nor in significant improvement in incidence of mechanical ventilation, incidence of ICU admission, length of ICU stay, and mortality rate.

静脉注射托珠单抗与标准护理对比治疗严重和危重 COVID-19 相关肺炎:单中心、双盲、安慰剂对照 3 期试验。
背景:严重和危重的 COVID-19 疾病的特征是高炎症反应,其中包括促炎症细胞因子,尤其是 IL-6。Tocilizumab是一种阻断IL-6受体的单克隆抗体:本研究评估了托西珠单抗对患有严重至危重 COVID-19 疾病的菲律宾患者的疗效:这项3期随机双盲试验按1:1的比例纳入了因重度或危重COVID-19住院的患者,让他们接受托西珠单抗加当地标准治疗或安慰剂加标准治疗。如果病情恶化或没有改善,患者有资格在24-48小时内再次进行静脉输注。治疗成功或临床改善的定义是,按照意向治疗的方式,患者状况在世卫组织 7 点正则量表中比基线至少改善了两个类别:49名患者被随机分配到托珠单抗治疗组,49名患者被随机分配到安慰剂治疗组。两组患者在年龄、合并症、COVID-19 严重程度、机械通气需求、急性呼吸窘迫综合征或生物标志物水平方面无明显差异。在意向治疗分析(相对风险=1.05,95% CI:0.85-1.30)和按方案分析(相对风险=0.98,95% CI:0.80-1.21)中,治疗成功率在组间无显著差异。在临床状态的7点序数表中,与基线相比至少改善两个类别的时间没有明显差异:结论:在标准治疗的基础上使用托西珠单抗治疗重度至危重COVID-19患者,并不能明显改善世卫组织7点标准量表定义的患者状况,也不能明显改善机械通气的发生率、入住重症监护室的发生率、重症监护室的住院时间和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Medica Philippina
Acta Medica Philippina Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
199
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信