Midori Kumagawa, K. Nibu, K. Kubota, Yuriko Nomaguchi, Y. Yoshiura
{"title":"BLOOD COMPONENT USAGE AT THE EMERGENCY AND CRITICAL CARE UNIT, FUKUOKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL","authors":"Midori Kumagawa, K. Nibu, K. Kubota, Yuriko Nomaguchi, Y. Yoshiura","doi":"10.3925/JJTC1958.51.430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyzed the usage of blood components at an Emergency and Critical Care Unit for 2 years, from 2001 to 2002. A total of 531 patients who received blood transfusions were divided into two groups, injured (group I; n=137 patients) and uninjured (group U; n=394 patients). Analysis of trigger points for transfusion revealed that group I showed statistically higher levels than those of group U, at 9.4 vs 8.6g/dl in Hemoglobin for red blood cell concentrates (RBCC), 69% vs 57% in prothrombin time for fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and 60, 000 vs 47, 000/μl in platelet counts for platelet concentrates. The trigger points in both groups for plasma transfusion were much higher than those recommended by the Government (30%). The FFP/RBCC ratios of transfused components were 0.31 in group I and 1.14 in group U. The cross-match/transfusion ratios were 1.3 in group I and 1.5 in group U, showing appropriate values. More than one kind of blood component was returned, however, during treatment in about one-half of group I and one-third of group U. Discussion of trigger points and other factors by the Blood Transfusion Committee is needed to determine the appropriate usage of blood components.","PeriodicalId":86521,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Yuketsu Gakkai zasshi = Journal of the Japan Society of Blood Transfusion","volume":"51 1","pages":"430-434"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Yuketsu Gakkai zasshi = Journal of the Japan Society of Blood Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3925/JJTC1958.51.430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
We analyzed the usage of blood components at an Emergency and Critical Care Unit for 2 years, from 2001 to 2002. A total of 531 patients who received blood transfusions were divided into two groups, injured (group I; n=137 patients) and uninjured (group U; n=394 patients). Analysis of trigger points for transfusion revealed that group I showed statistically higher levels than those of group U, at 9.4 vs 8.6g/dl in Hemoglobin for red blood cell concentrates (RBCC), 69% vs 57% in prothrombin time for fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and 60, 000 vs 47, 000/μl in platelet counts for platelet concentrates. The trigger points in both groups for plasma transfusion were much higher than those recommended by the Government (30%). The FFP/RBCC ratios of transfused components were 0.31 in group I and 1.14 in group U. The cross-match/transfusion ratios were 1.3 in group I and 1.5 in group U, showing appropriate values. More than one kind of blood component was returned, however, during treatment in about one-half of group I and one-third of group U. Discussion of trigger points and other factors by the Blood Transfusion Committee is needed to determine the appropriate usage of blood components.
我们分析了从2001年到2002年2年间急诊和重症监护病房血液成分的使用情况。531例接受输血的患者分为两组,受伤组(I组;n=137例)和未受伤(U组;n = 394名患者)。输血触发点分析显示,I组的血红蛋白水平在统计学上高于U组,红细胞浓缩物(RBCC)的血红蛋白为9.4 g/dl vs 8.6g/dl,新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP)的凝血酶原时间为69% vs 57%,血小板浓缩物的血小板计数为60000 vs 47000 /μl。两组血浆输注的触发点都远高于政府建议的触发点(30%)。输注组分FFP/RBCC比值I组为0.31,U组为1.14,交叉配血/输注比值I组为1.3,U组为1.5,均为适宜值。然而,在治疗过程中,大约有一半的I组和三分之一的u组返回了不止一种血液成分,输血委员会需要讨论触发点和其他因素,以确定血液成分的适当使用。