ANALYSIS OF WEAK REACTION SAMPLES IN REVERSED TYPING WITH COLUMN AGGLUTINATION TECHNOLOGY

Yoko Hidaka, N. Kawata, M. Okuda, Tadashi Kato, Tomoko Kuribayashi, Nobuya Koyama, A. Ohara
{"title":"ANALYSIS OF WEAK REACTION SAMPLES IN REVERSED TYPING WITH COLUMN AGGLUTINATION TECHNOLOGY","authors":"Yoko Hidaka, N. Kawata, M. Okuda, Tadashi Kato, Tomoko Kuribayashi, Nobuya Koyama, A. Ohara","doi":"10.3925/JJTC1958.51.565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The automated blood group testing system based on column agglutination technology(CAT) does not provide a standard for reversed typing. If the tube test(TT)method standard is introduced into automated the CAT method, the frequency of confirmation testing with the TT method will increase. In this study, we compared the results of the CAT and TT methods using samples which produced weak results with the automated CAT method(reactivity<3+;AutoVue System, Ortho). Forty-five percent of weak samples showed an increase in agglutination reactivity after a fixed 3-minute incubation time with the manual CAT method(Bio Vue, Ortho). All 481 weak samples had greater than 3+reactivity with the TT method. Eighty percent of weak samples possessed IgM antibody. Titration and scoring results with the TT method were greater than with the manual CAT method for all samples. Titration and scoring of the weak samples were low with all methods for all samples. In conclusion, we propose that 1+reactivity in the automated CAT method requires a confirmation test with the TT method because CAT 2+samples can present as 3+with the TT method.","PeriodicalId":86521,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Yuketsu Gakkai zasshi = Journal of the Japan Society of Blood Transfusion","volume":"51 1","pages":"565-570"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Yuketsu Gakkai zasshi = Journal of the Japan Society of Blood Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3925/JJTC1958.51.565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The automated blood group testing system based on column agglutination technology(CAT) does not provide a standard for reversed typing. If the tube test(TT)method standard is introduced into automated the CAT method, the frequency of confirmation testing with the TT method will increase. In this study, we compared the results of the CAT and TT methods using samples which produced weak results with the automated CAT method(reactivity<3+;AutoVue System, Ortho). Forty-five percent of weak samples showed an increase in agglutination reactivity after a fixed 3-minute incubation time with the manual CAT method(Bio Vue, Ortho). All 481 weak samples had greater than 3+reactivity with the TT method. Eighty percent of weak samples possessed IgM antibody. Titration and scoring results with the TT method were greater than with the manual CAT method for all samples. Titration and scoring of the weak samples were low with all methods for all samples. In conclusion, we propose that 1+reactivity in the automated CAT method requires a confirmation test with the TT method because CAT 2+samples can present as 3+with the TT method.
反型弱反应样品的柱凝集分析
基于柱凝集技术(CAT)的自动血型检测系统没有提供反分型的标准。如果将试管试验(TT)方法标准引入到自动化CAT方法中,使用TT方法进行确认测试的频率将会增加。在本研究中,我们比较了CAT和TT方法的结果,使用自动CAT方法(反应性<3+;AutoVue System, Ortho)产生弱结果的样品。45%的弱样品在使用手动CAT方法(Bio Vue, Ortho)固定的3分钟孵育时间后显示凝集反应性增加。所有481个弱样品的TT反应性均大于3+。80%的弱样本具有IgM抗体。所有样品的TT法滴定和评分结果均优于手工CAT法。所有方法对弱样品的滴定和评分均较低。综上所述,我们建议自动CAT方法中的1+反应性需要用TT方法进行确认测试,因为CAT 2+样品可以在TT方法中呈现为3+。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信