Newborn and Maternal Outcomes in Out-of-Hospital Delivery: A Review

D. Amorim, H. Machado
{"title":"Newborn and Maternal Outcomes in Out-of-Hospital Delivery: A Review","authors":"D. Amorim, H. Machado","doi":"10.4172/2376-127X.1000371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: As maternity services became available out-of-hospital births diminished in favor of planned hospital deliveries. After an early decline, there is a recent increase of out-of-hospital births in United States, from 0.87% in 2004 to 1.36% in 2012. Reasons why women have an out-of-hospital birth differ between countries. Many women feel that hospital is the safest place to give birth, but others believe that hospital is impersonal and a place that provoke anxiety. Maternal outcomes due to labor include: Obstetric interventions’ and non-related with interventions. Newborn outcomes comprise: 5 min Apgar 90% for gestational age or ≥ 4000 g), postdatism (≥ 42 weeks’ gestation), assisted ventilation requirement and neonatal/perinatal death. The aim of this review was to understand the real impact of out-of-hospital births in newborn and maternal outcomes. Methods: The search was performed on PubMed, from which 45 articles met all inclusion criteria. Results: In developed countries, home birth rate is very low (1-2% in UK, 1% in New Zealand, 0.6% in USA, 0.5% in France and 0.4% in Australia), the exception is Netherland (30%). In developing countries, the situation is quite different: Home birth rate is 95% in Bangladesh, 41% in Mozambique and 90% in Nepal. Unplanned out-of-hospital births had higher incidence of maternal and newborn complications. Planned out-of-hospital deliveries also showed higher incidence of newborn complications, especially when transferred babies were considered also out-of-hospital births. Discussion: Although some studies showed that maternal-fetal outcomes occur in the same proportion in planned low risk out-of-hospital births compared to hospital births, unplanned or high-risk out-of-hospital births show higher incidence of maternal and newborn complications. Conclusion: The safety of out-of-hospital births remains controversial because the benefits may be overcome by the disadvantages, given the maternal and birth risk and the unplanned scenarios.","PeriodicalId":87313,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pregnancy and child health","volume":"126 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2376-127X.1000371","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pregnancy and child health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2376-127X.1000371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Introduction: As maternity services became available out-of-hospital births diminished in favor of planned hospital deliveries. After an early decline, there is a recent increase of out-of-hospital births in United States, from 0.87% in 2004 to 1.36% in 2012. Reasons why women have an out-of-hospital birth differ between countries. Many women feel that hospital is the safest place to give birth, but others believe that hospital is impersonal and a place that provoke anxiety. Maternal outcomes due to labor include: Obstetric interventions’ and non-related with interventions. Newborn outcomes comprise: 5 min Apgar 90% for gestational age or ≥ 4000 g), postdatism (≥ 42 weeks’ gestation), assisted ventilation requirement and neonatal/perinatal death. The aim of this review was to understand the real impact of out-of-hospital births in newborn and maternal outcomes. Methods: The search was performed on PubMed, from which 45 articles met all inclusion criteria. Results: In developed countries, home birth rate is very low (1-2% in UK, 1% in New Zealand, 0.6% in USA, 0.5% in France and 0.4% in Australia), the exception is Netherland (30%). In developing countries, the situation is quite different: Home birth rate is 95% in Bangladesh, 41% in Mozambique and 90% in Nepal. Unplanned out-of-hospital births had higher incidence of maternal and newborn complications. Planned out-of-hospital deliveries also showed higher incidence of newborn complications, especially when transferred babies were considered also out-of-hospital births. Discussion: Although some studies showed that maternal-fetal outcomes occur in the same proportion in planned low risk out-of-hospital births compared to hospital births, unplanned or high-risk out-of-hospital births show higher incidence of maternal and newborn complications. Conclusion: The safety of out-of-hospital births remains controversial because the benefits may be overcome by the disadvantages, given the maternal and birth risk and the unplanned scenarios.
院外分娩的新生儿和产妇结局:综述
导言:随着产科服务的普及,院外分娩逐渐减少,取而代之的是有计划的住院分娩。在经历了早期的下降之后,美国的院外分娩率最近有所上升,从2004年的0.87%上升到2012年的1.36%。妇女在医院外分娩的原因因国家而异。许多妇女认为医院是最安全的分娩场所,但也有人认为医院没有人情味,是一个令人焦虑的地方。分娩导致的产妇结局包括:产科干预和与干预无关的。新生儿结局包括:5 min Apgar(90%胎龄或≥4000 g)、产后流产(≥42周妊娠)、辅助通气需求和新生儿/围产期死亡。本综述的目的是了解院外分娩对新生儿和产妇结局的真正影响。方法:在PubMed上进行检索,其中45篇文章符合所有纳入标准。结果:在发达国家,家庭出生率很低(英国1-2%,新西兰1%,美国0.6%,法国0.5%,澳大利亚0.4%),只有荷兰例外(30%)。在发展中国家,情况则大不相同:孟加拉国的家庭出生率为95%,莫桑比克为41%,尼泊尔为90%。计划外院外分娩的产妇和新生儿并发症发生率较高。计划的院外分娩也显示出较高的新生儿并发症发生率,特别是当转移的婴儿也被认为是院外分娩时。讨论:尽管一些研究表明,与住院分娩相比,计划低风险院外分娩中母胎结局的发生率相同,但计划外或高风险院外分娩显示出更高的孕产妇和新生儿并发症发生率。结论:考虑到产妇和分娩的风险以及意外情况,院外分娩的安全性仍然存在争议,因为它的好处可能被缺点所抵消。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信