Feto-Maternal Outcome of Vaginal Birth after Cesarean and Associated Factors Among Mothers with Previous Cesarean Scar at Attat Lord Merry Primary Hospital, Gurage Zone, South Ethiopia

Y. Siraneh, F. Assefa, M. Tesfaye
{"title":"Feto-Maternal Outcome of Vaginal Birth after Cesarean and Associated Factors Among Mothers with Previous Cesarean Scar at Attat Lord Merry Primary Hospital, Gurage Zone, South Ethiopia","authors":"Y. Siraneh, F. Assefa, M. Tesfaye","doi":"10.4172/2376-127X.1000390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Vaginal delivery after previous one cesarean section for a non-recurring indication has been described by several authors as safe and having a success rate of 60-80%. Hence, many health professionals were encouraging Vaginal Birth After Cesarean (VBAC) for candidates leaving the century old dictum of once cesarean always cesarean. However, predicting success of VBAC following Trial of Scar (TOS) is still a difficult task due to the lack of a validated prediction tool. In addition to this, feto-maternal outcome was also uncertain and unknown in the study area including factors associated with. Hence, the objective of this study was to determine the perinatal and maternal outcome of pregnancy and factors associated with success of VBAC among mothers who had previous one cesarean section and gave birth at Attat Catholic Primary Hospital, South Ethiopia. Methods: Facility based retrospective cross-sectional study design was used at Attat Catholic Hospital, Ethiopia from October 01/2015-Septmeber 30/2016. The data was collected from October 01-15, 2016. The data on Sociodemographic, obstetric factors and outcome related variables were collected from medical record books using pretested data collection tool by trained data collectors. The collected data were coded, cleaned and entered to SPSS version 21 for analysis. Descriptive statistics was used to describe some of study variables. Logistic regression analysis (bivariate and multivariable logistic regression) was employed. Statistical tests such as Odds ratio (absolute measure of association) with 95% CI was used to see the associations. A P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant in all types of tests to declare significance. Results : Out of all mothers who gave birth, 169 mothers gave birth with pervious one caesarean section scar from which repeated caesarean section was 104 (61.5%). Majority 81 (78%) of them were done as an emergence and 146 offered TOS. Less than half of them 65 (44.5%) had successful VBAC and Cephalo-Pelvic Disproportion (CPD) was the major indication for failed VBAC. Passage of liquor at admission (AOR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.084,0.733), history of vaginal birth after cesarean (AOR: 1.88, 95% CI : 0.084, 0.733), cervical dilation at admission (AOR: 8.171, 95% CI: 3.303, 34.473) and type of indication for pervious cesarean section (AOR: 0.703, 95% CI: 0.014, 0.364) were significant factors associated with success of VBAC. Conclusion: Successful vaginal delivery after one previous cesarean scar was 45.5% which was relatively low. Trial of vaginal birth after cesarean section should be encouraged for appropriate cases. Before indicating mothers for cesarean delivery due to only having history of previous one cesarean section, attention should be given to the indication to avoid unnecessary cesarean section. *Corresponding author: Yibeltal Siraneh, Department of Health Economics, Management and Policy, Faculty of Public Health, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Ethiopia, Tel: +251917017092; Fax: +6622437907; E-mail: yibeltal_siraneh@yahoo.com Received: September 05, 2018; Accepted: September 19, 2018; Published: September 26, 2018 Citation: Siraneh Y, Assefa F, Tesfaye M (2018) Feto-Maternal Outcome of Vaginal Birth after Cesarean and Associated Factors Among Mothers with Previous Cesarean Scar at Attat Lord Merry Primary Hospital, Gurage Zone, South Ethiopia. J Preg Child Health 5: 390. doi:10.4172/2376-127X.1000390 Copyright: © 2018 Siraneh Y, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.","PeriodicalId":87313,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pregnancy and child health","volume":"05 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2376-127X.1000390","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pregnancy and child health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2376-127X.1000390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: Vaginal delivery after previous one cesarean section for a non-recurring indication has been described by several authors as safe and having a success rate of 60-80%. Hence, many health professionals were encouraging Vaginal Birth After Cesarean (VBAC) for candidates leaving the century old dictum of once cesarean always cesarean. However, predicting success of VBAC following Trial of Scar (TOS) is still a difficult task due to the lack of a validated prediction tool. In addition to this, feto-maternal outcome was also uncertain and unknown in the study area including factors associated with. Hence, the objective of this study was to determine the perinatal and maternal outcome of pregnancy and factors associated with success of VBAC among mothers who had previous one cesarean section and gave birth at Attat Catholic Primary Hospital, South Ethiopia. Methods: Facility based retrospective cross-sectional study design was used at Attat Catholic Hospital, Ethiopia from October 01/2015-Septmeber 30/2016. The data was collected from October 01-15, 2016. The data on Sociodemographic, obstetric factors and outcome related variables were collected from medical record books using pretested data collection tool by trained data collectors. The collected data were coded, cleaned and entered to SPSS version 21 for analysis. Descriptive statistics was used to describe some of study variables. Logistic regression analysis (bivariate and multivariable logistic regression) was employed. Statistical tests such as Odds ratio (absolute measure of association) with 95% CI was used to see the associations. A P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant in all types of tests to declare significance. Results : Out of all mothers who gave birth, 169 mothers gave birth with pervious one caesarean section scar from which repeated caesarean section was 104 (61.5%). Majority 81 (78%) of them were done as an emergence and 146 offered TOS. Less than half of them 65 (44.5%) had successful VBAC and Cephalo-Pelvic Disproportion (CPD) was the major indication for failed VBAC. Passage of liquor at admission (AOR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.084,0.733), history of vaginal birth after cesarean (AOR: 1.88, 95% CI : 0.084, 0.733), cervical dilation at admission (AOR: 8.171, 95% CI: 3.303, 34.473) and type of indication for pervious cesarean section (AOR: 0.703, 95% CI: 0.014, 0.364) were significant factors associated with success of VBAC. Conclusion: Successful vaginal delivery after one previous cesarean scar was 45.5% which was relatively low. Trial of vaginal birth after cesarean section should be encouraged for appropriate cases. Before indicating mothers for cesarean delivery due to only having history of previous one cesarean section, attention should be given to the indication to avoid unnecessary cesarean section. *Corresponding author: Yibeltal Siraneh, Department of Health Economics, Management and Policy, Faculty of Public Health, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Ethiopia, Tel: +251917017092; Fax: +6622437907; E-mail: yibeltal_siraneh@yahoo.com Received: September 05, 2018; Accepted: September 19, 2018; Published: September 26, 2018 Citation: Siraneh Y, Assefa F, Tesfaye M (2018) Feto-Maternal Outcome of Vaginal Birth after Cesarean and Associated Factors Among Mothers with Previous Cesarean Scar at Attat Lord Merry Primary Hospital, Gurage Zone, South Ethiopia. J Preg Child Health 5: 390. doi:10.4172/2376-127X.1000390 Copyright: © 2018 Siraneh Y, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
埃塞俄比亚南部古拉格区Attat Lord Merry初级医院既往有剖宫产疤痕的母亲剖宫产后胎母顺产结局及相关因素
背景:有几位作者认为,在一次非复发指征的剖宫产术后阴道分娩是安全的,成功率为60-80%。因此,许多卫生专业人员鼓励剖宫产后阴道分娩(VBAC)的候选人离开一个世纪以来的格言,一次剖宫产总是剖宫产。然而,由于缺乏有效的预测工具,预测疤痕试验(TOS)后VBAC的成功仍然是一项艰巨的任务。除此之外,研究区域的胎母结局也是不确定和未知的,包括与。因此,本研究的目的是确定在南埃塞俄比亚Attat天主教初级医院进行过一次剖宫产并分娩的母亲的围产期和产妇妊娠结局以及与VBAC成功相关的因素。方法:2015年10月1日- 2016年9月30日在埃塞俄比亚Attat天主教医院采用基于设施的回顾性横断面研究设计。数据收集时间为2016年10月01-15日。社会人口学、产科因素和结果相关变量的数据由训练有素的数据收集人员使用预先测试的数据收集工具从病历簿中收集。对收集到的数据进行编码、清洗并输入SPSS 21进行分析。描述性统计用于描述一些研究变量。采用Logistic回归分析(双变量和多变量Logistic回归)。采用95% CI的比值比(绝对关联度量)等统计检验来观察相关性。各类型检验均以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:所有分娩的产妇中,有169例分娩时出现过一次剖宫产瘢痕,其中有104例(61.5%)为再次剖宫产瘢痕。其中81例(78%)为急诊,146例为TOS。65例患者中,不到一半(44.5%)VBAC成功,颅盆腔失调(CPD)是VBAC失败的主要指征。入院时是否饮酒(AOR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.084,0.733)、剖宫产后阴道分娩史(AOR: 1.88, 95% CI: 0.084,0.733)、入院时宫颈扩张(AOR: 8.171, 95% CI: 3.303, 34.473)和既往剖宫产指征类型(AOR: 0.703, 95% CI: 0.014, 0.364)是影响VBAC成功的显著因素。结论:1次剖宫产瘢痕术后阴道分娩成功率为45.5%,较低。在适当的情况下,应鼓励剖宫产后尝试顺产。仅有一次剖宫产史的产妇在提示剖宫产前,应注意指征,避免不必要的剖宫产。*通讯作者:Yibeltal Siraneh,埃塞俄比亚吉马大学卫生研究所公共卫生学院卫生经济、管理与政策系,电话:+251917017092;传真:+ 6622437907;邮箱:yibeltal_siraneh@yahoo.com收稿日期:2018年09月05日;录用日期:2018年9月19日;引文:Siraneh Y, Assefa F, Tesfaye M(2018)在Attat Lord Merry初级医院,古拉区,南埃塞俄比亚,剖宫产后阴道分娩的胎母结局及既往剖宫产疤痕的相关因素。[J]妇幼保健5:390。2376 - 127 - x.1000390 doi: 10.4172 /版权所有:©2018 Siraneh Y, et al。这是一篇根据知识共享署名许可协议发布的开放获取文章,该协议允许在任何媒体上不受限制地使用、分发和复制,前提是要注明原作者和来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信