Effect of Nebulized 3% Hypertonic Saline on Intensive Care Unit Admission Rates of Infants with Moderate Acute Bronchiolitis

J. Flores-González, P. Rodríguez-Campoy, J. Perez-Guerrero, B. Serrano-Moyano, E. Palma-Zambrana, P. Comino-Vazquez, G. González, A. Lechuga-Sancho
{"title":"Effect of Nebulized 3% Hypertonic Saline on Intensive Care Unit Admission Rates of Infants with Moderate Acute Bronchiolitis","authors":"J. Flores-González, P. Rodríguez-Campoy, J. Perez-Guerrero, B. Serrano-Moyano, E. Palma-Zambrana, P. Comino-Vazquez, G. González, A. Lechuga-Sancho","doi":"10.4172/2155-9627.1000281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To investigate whether the use of nebulized 3% hypertonic saline in infants hospitalized for acute bronchiolitis reduces their rate of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission, the mean length of PICU stay and total hospital stay. \nMethods: Cross-sectional study including 626 infants hospitalized for moderate acute bronchiolitis comparing a group receiving nebulized 3% hypertonic saline (HS group) between September 2011 and May 2014 (n=320), with a historic control group treated with normal saline (NS group) between September 2007 and May 2010 (n=306) independently of the concomitant use of bronchodilators. \nResults: Overall hospital stay including days at PICU, was significantly reduced in HS group (4 days (0-46) vs 5 days (1-73); p<0.0001). However, we did not find a significant reduction in PICU admission rate in the HS group (p=0.115), neither in the length of stay (LOS) in PICU (5 days (1-30) vs 6 days (1-26); p=0.402). Half as many admission were observed in patients with risk factors of severe disease in HS group (6.5% of those with risk factors vs 3.1% of those without risk factors), although this failure to find a difference (p=0.136). \nConclusions: Treatment with nebulized 3% hypertonic saline was not accompanied by a reduction in PICU admission. There was no difference in PICU length of stay in infants with acute bronchiolitis, and admission rates in infants with risk factors for serious bronchiolitis; it was also associated with a significantly shorter mean hospital stay.","PeriodicalId":89408,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical research & bioethics","volume":"26 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical research & bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9627.1000281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate whether the use of nebulized 3% hypertonic saline in infants hospitalized for acute bronchiolitis reduces their rate of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission, the mean length of PICU stay and total hospital stay. Methods: Cross-sectional study including 626 infants hospitalized for moderate acute bronchiolitis comparing a group receiving nebulized 3% hypertonic saline (HS group) between September 2011 and May 2014 (n=320), with a historic control group treated with normal saline (NS group) between September 2007 and May 2010 (n=306) independently of the concomitant use of bronchodilators. Results: Overall hospital stay including days at PICU, was significantly reduced in HS group (4 days (0-46) vs 5 days (1-73); p<0.0001). However, we did not find a significant reduction in PICU admission rate in the HS group (p=0.115), neither in the length of stay (LOS) in PICU (5 days (1-30) vs 6 days (1-26); p=0.402). Half as many admission were observed in patients with risk factors of severe disease in HS group (6.5% of those with risk factors vs 3.1% of those without risk factors), although this failure to find a difference (p=0.136). Conclusions: Treatment with nebulized 3% hypertonic saline was not accompanied by a reduction in PICU admission. There was no difference in PICU length of stay in infants with acute bronchiolitis, and admission rates in infants with risk factors for serious bronchiolitis; it was also associated with a significantly shorter mean hospital stay.
3%高渗盐水雾化对中度急性毛细支气管炎患儿重症监护病房住院率的影响
目的:探讨3%高渗生理盐水雾化治疗急性毛细支气管炎患儿是否能降低儿童重症监护病房(PICU)入院率、PICU平均住院时间和总住院时间。方法:横断面研究纳入626例因中度急性细支气管炎住院的婴儿,比较2011年9月至2014年5月期间接受3%高渗生理盐水雾化治疗组(n=320)和2007年9月至2010年5月期间接受生理盐水雾化治疗的历史对照组(n=306),且不同时使用支气管扩张剂。结果:HS组患者总住院时间(包括PICU天数)明显缩短(4天(0-46)vs 5天(1-73);p < 0.0001)。然而,我们没有发现HS组PICU入院率显著降低(p=0.115), PICU住院时间(LOS)也没有显著降低(5天(1-30)vs 6天(1-26);p = 0.402)。在HS组中,有严重疾病危险因素的患者入院的人数减少了一半(有危险因素的患者占6.5%,无危险因素的患者占3.1%),尽管没有发现差异(p=0.136)。结论:3%高渗生理盐水雾化治疗不伴有PICU入院率的降低。急性细支气管炎患儿PICU住院时间和有严重细支气管炎危险因素患儿住院率无差异;它还与平均住院时间明显缩短有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信