Quality and Quantity of Rehabilitation Exercises Delivered By A 3-D Motion Controlled Camera: A Pilot Study

R. Komatireddy, A. Chokshi, Jeanna Basnett, Michael Casale, D. Goble, T. Shubert
{"title":"Quality and Quantity of Rehabilitation Exercises Delivered By A 3-D Motion Controlled Camera: A Pilot Study","authors":"R. Komatireddy, A. Chokshi, Jeanna Basnett, Michael Casale, D. Goble, T. Shubert","doi":"10.4172/2329-9096.1000214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Tele-rehabiliation technologies that track human motion could enable physical therapy in the home. To be effective, these systems need to collect critical metrics without PT supervision both in real time and in a store and forward capacity. The first step of this process is to determine if PTs (PTs) are able to accurately assess the quality and quantity of an exercise repetition captured by a tele-rehabilitation platform. The purpose of this pilot project was to determine the level of agreement of quality and quantity of an exercise delivered and assessed by the Virtual Exercise Rehabilitation Assistant (VERA), and seven PTs. Methods Ten healthy subjects were instructed by a PT in how to perform four lower extremity exercises. Subjects then performed each exercises delivered by VERA which counted repetitions and quality. Seven PTs independently reviewed video of each subject’s session and assessed repetitions quality. The percent difference in total repetitions and analysis of the distribution of rating repetition quality was assessed between the VERA and PTs. Results The VERA counted 426 repetitions across 10 subjects performing the four different exercises while the mean repetition count from the PT panel was 426.7 (SD = 0.8). The VERA underestimated the total repetitions performed by 0.16% (SD = 0.03%, 95% CI 0.12 – 0. 22). Chi square analysis across raters was χ2 = 63.17 (df = 6, p<.001), suggesting significant variance in at least one rater. Conclusion The VERA count of repetitions was accurate in comparison to a seven member panel of PTs. For exercise quality the VERA was able to rate 426 exercise repetitions across 10 patients and four different exercises in a manner consistent with five out of seven experienced PTs.","PeriodicalId":73470,"journal":{"name":"International journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2329-9096.1000214","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-9096.1000214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

Abstract

Introduction Tele-rehabiliation technologies that track human motion could enable physical therapy in the home. To be effective, these systems need to collect critical metrics without PT supervision both in real time and in a store and forward capacity. The first step of this process is to determine if PTs (PTs) are able to accurately assess the quality and quantity of an exercise repetition captured by a tele-rehabilitation platform. The purpose of this pilot project was to determine the level of agreement of quality and quantity of an exercise delivered and assessed by the Virtual Exercise Rehabilitation Assistant (VERA), and seven PTs. Methods Ten healthy subjects were instructed by a PT in how to perform four lower extremity exercises. Subjects then performed each exercises delivered by VERA which counted repetitions and quality. Seven PTs independently reviewed video of each subject’s session and assessed repetitions quality. The percent difference in total repetitions and analysis of the distribution of rating repetition quality was assessed between the VERA and PTs. Results The VERA counted 426 repetitions across 10 subjects performing the four different exercises while the mean repetition count from the PT panel was 426.7 (SD = 0.8). The VERA underestimated the total repetitions performed by 0.16% (SD = 0.03%, 95% CI 0.12 – 0. 22). Chi square analysis across raters was χ2 = 63.17 (df = 6, p<.001), suggesting significant variance in at least one rater. Conclusion The VERA count of repetitions was accurate in comparison to a seven member panel of PTs. For exercise quality the VERA was able to rate 426 exercise repetitions across 10 patients and four different exercises in a manner consistent with five out of seven experienced PTs.
3-D运动控制摄像机提供的康复训练的质量和数量:一项试点研究
跟踪人体运动的远程康复技术可以在家中进行物理治疗。为了提高效率,这些系统需要在没有PT监督的情况下实时收集关键指标,并在存储和转发容量中进行收集。该过程的第一步是确定PTs (PTs)是否能够准确评估远程康复平台捕获的重复运动的质量和数量。该试点项目的目的是确定由虚拟运动康复助理(VERA)和7名pt提供和评估的运动的质量和数量的一致程度。方法10名健康受试者在PT指导下进行4项下肢运动。然后,受试者进行VERA提供的每个练习,并计算重复次数和质量。7名PTs独立审查每个受试者的会话视频并评估重复质量。评估VERA和PTs在总重复次数和评分重复质量分布分析方面的百分比差异。结果VERA统计了10名受试者进行4种不同练习的426次重复,而PT组的平均重复次数为426.7次(SD = 0.8)。VERA低估了总重复数0.16% (SD = 0.03%, 95% CI 0.12 - 0)。22)。两组间卡方分析χ2 = 63.17 (df = 6, p<.001),表明至少有一个组间存在显著差异。结论与7人PTs组相比,重复VERA计数是准确的。对于运动质量,VERA能够对10名患者的426次重复运动和4种不同的运动进行评分,其方式与7名经验丰富的PTs中的5名一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信