Sex attribution, gender identity and quality of life in disorders of sex development due to 45,X/46,XY mosaicism: methods for clinical and psychosocial assessment

R. Risso, S. Einaudi, C. Crespi, Angela M. Caldarera, F. Verna, E. Merlini, R. Lala
{"title":"Sex attribution, gender identity and quality of life in disorders of sex development due to 45,X/46,XY mosaicism: methods for clinical and psychosocial assessment","authors":"R. Risso, S. Einaudi, C. Crespi, Angela M. Caldarera, F. Verna, E. Merlini, R. Lala","doi":"10.3934/genet.2015.2.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The choice of sex in newborns with genital ambiguity is challenging. Information concerning the satisfaction of subjects with disorders of sex development from childhood to adulthood is required in order to address sex attribution policies. This study focuses on the methods that enable clinicians to investigate the alignment of phenotypes with gender identity and quality of life in people with disorders of this kind. These methods are presented as tools for studying a cohort of ten subjects with 45,X/46,XY mosaicism examined between 1985 and 2014 in the Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Regina Margherita Children's Hospital, Turin: five children and five young adults, four reared as females and six as males. Clinical outcome was assessed by means of a clinical scoring system considering height, genital appearance, gonads and pubertal development. The Gender Identity Questionnaire for Children and the World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment were adopted. The four male children strongly identified with their assigned sex: male attribution was satisfactory until pubertal age. In young adults the clinical scores ranged between 55–65% for both genders. In the young male, the reduced sexual activity and the poor body image perception strongly affected his quality of life. The clinical scores of the two young female adults (60% for both) were not balanced with their quality of life scores (87.5% and 68.75% respectively): individual traits and social-familial context should be investigated in order to explain these differences. Clinical and psychosocial assessment in people with disorders of sex development is mandatory in order to plan care procedures; a detailed analysis requires adequate tools. Clinical scoring system, Gender Identity Questionnaire for Children and World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment can be used to investigate the alignment of physical phenotype with gender identity and quality of life.","PeriodicalId":43477,"journal":{"name":"AIMS Genetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIMS Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/genet.2015.2.127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract The choice of sex in newborns with genital ambiguity is challenging. Information concerning the satisfaction of subjects with disorders of sex development from childhood to adulthood is required in order to address sex attribution policies. This study focuses on the methods that enable clinicians to investigate the alignment of phenotypes with gender identity and quality of life in people with disorders of this kind. These methods are presented as tools for studying a cohort of ten subjects with 45,X/46,XY mosaicism examined between 1985 and 2014 in the Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Regina Margherita Children's Hospital, Turin: five children and five young adults, four reared as females and six as males. Clinical outcome was assessed by means of a clinical scoring system considering height, genital appearance, gonads and pubertal development. The Gender Identity Questionnaire for Children and the World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment were adopted. The four male children strongly identified with their assigned sex: male attribution was satisfactory until pubertal age. In young adults the clinical scores ranged between 55–65% for both genders. In the young male, the reduced sexual activity and the poor body image perception strongly affected his quality of life. The clinical scores of the two young female adults (60% for both) were not balanced with their quality of life scores (87.5% and 68.75% respectively): individual traits and social-familial context should be investigated in order to explain these differences. Clinical and psychosocial assessment in people with disorders of sex development is mandatory in order to plan care procedures; a detailed analysis requires adequate tools. Clinical scoring system, Gender Identity Questionnaire for Children and World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment can be used to investigate the alignment of physical phenotype with gender identity and quality of life.
45、X/46、XY嵌合导致的性发育障碍的性别归因、性别认同和生活质量:临床和社会心理评估方法
性器官模糊的新生儿性别选择具有挑战性。为了解决性别归因政策,需要关于从儿童期到成年期性发育障碍受试者满意度的信息。这项研究的重点是方法,使临床医生调查的表型与性别认同和生活质量的人与这类疾病的对齐。这些方法是作为研究1985年至2014年间在都灵Regina Margherita儿童医院儿科内分泌科检查的10名45、X/46、XY马赛克受试者的工具提出的:5名儿童和5名年轻人,4名女性和6名男性。临床结果通过临床评分系统评估,考虑身高,生殖器外观,性腺和青春期发育。采用了儿童性别认同调查表和世界卫生组织生活质量评估。四名男孩强烈认同他们的性别分配:男性归属是令人满意的,直到青春期。在年轻人中,男女的临床得分在55-65%之间。在年轻男性中,性活动减少和身体形象感知差强烈影响了他的生活质量。两名年轻成年女性的临床得分(均为60%)与她们的生活质量得分(分别为87.5%和68.75%)并不平衡:为了解释这些差异,应该调查个体特征和社会家庭背景。必须对性发育障碍患者进行临床和社会心理评估,以便规划护理程序;详细的分析需要适当的工具。临床评分系统、儿童性别认同问卷和世界卫生组织生活质量评估可用于调查身体表型与性别认同和生活质量的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AIMS Genetics
AIMS Genetics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信