Podocalyxin-Targeting Comparative Glycan Profiling Reveals Difference between Human Embryonic Stem Cells and Embryonal Carcinoma Cells

Yoko Itakura, A. Kuno, M. Toyoda, A. Umezawa, J. Hirabayashi
{"title":"Podocalyxin-Targeting Comparative Glycan Profiling Reveals Difference between Human Embryonic Stem Cells and Embryonal Carcinoma Cells","authors":"Yoko Itakura, A. Kuno, M. Toyoda, A. Umezawa, J. Hirabayashi","doi":"10.4172/2153-0637.S5-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and human embryonal carcinoma cells (hECCs) have been extensively used for stem cell research. Although these cells are known to share many properties including high developmental capability and cell surface antigens, their origins are basically different: hECSs are derived from inner cell mass of blastocysts, while hECCs are from malignant tumors. Thus, the lack of a good method to differentiate these pluripotent cells remains a critical issue to diagnose tumorigenic potential of pluripotent stem cells for their medical applications. In this context, development of specific markers to distinguish hESCs from hECCs is also of clinical value. \nMethod: In this study, we focused our glycan analysis on a carbohydrate-rich glycoprotein, podocalyxin, known as a carrier of TRA-1-60 and TRA-1-81 antigens, which represent hESC glycan markers. The target glycoprotein semi-quantified by immunoblotting was enriched from the cell extracts by immunoprecipitation, and the glycosylation differences occurring between hESCs and hECCs were systematically analyzed by an advanced technology of lectin microarray, antibody-overlay lectin profiling (ALP). Profiles of human embryonic bodies (hEBs) differentiated from hESCs were also analyzed. \nResults and Conclusion: A glycan profile of podocalyxin from hECCs was significantly different from that of hESCs. Lectin signals corresponding to α2-6 linked sialic acid were elevated in the hECCs, and glycosidase digestions further revealed significant difference in the non-reducing terminal and penultimate structures. These results demonstrate that the present procedure with focus on a particular glycoprotein could enhance relatively small but significant differences between closely related cells like hESCs and hECCs at the glycome level. The present finding will be helpful to develop a diagnostic method to distinguish undifferentiated stem cells from differentiated ones used for regenerative therapy.","PeriodicalId":89585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of glycomics & lipidomics","volume":"2012 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of glycomics & lipidomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2153-0637.S5-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and human embryonal carcinoma cells (hECCs) have been extensively used for stem cell research. Although these cells are known to share many properties including high developmental capability and cell surface antigens, their origins are basically different: hECSs are derived from inner cell mass of blastocysts, while hECCs are from malignant tumors. Thus, the lack of a good method to differentiate these pluripotent cells remains a critical issue to diagnose tumorigenic potential of pluripotent stem cells for their medical applications. In this context, development of specific markers to distinguish hESCs from hECCs is also of clinical value. Method: In this study, we focused our glycan analysis on a carbohydrate-rich glycoprotein, podocalyxin, known as a carrier of TRA-1-60 and TRA-1-81 antigens, which represent hESC glycan markers. The target glycoprotein semi-quantified by immunoblotting was enriched from the cell extracts by immunoprecipitation, and the glycosylation differences occurring between hESCs and hECCs were systematically analyzed by an advanced technology of lectin microarray, antibody-overlay lectin profiling (ALP). Profiles of human embryonic bodies (hEBs) differentiated from hESCs were also analyzed. Results and Conclusion: A glycan profile of podocalyxin from hECCs was significantly different from that of hESCs. Lectin signals corresponding to α2-6 linked sialic acid were elevated in the hECCs, and glycosidase digestions further revealed significant difference in the non-reducing terminal and penultimate structures. These results demonstrate that the present procedure with focus on a particular glycoprotein could enhance relatively small but significant differences between closely related cells like hESCs and hECCs at the glycome level. The present finding will be helpful to develop a diagnostic method to distinguish undifferentiated stem cells from differentiated ones used for regenerative therapy.
足足alyxin靶向比较聚糖谱揭示人胚胎干细胞和胚胎癌细胞的差异
背景:人胚胎干细胞(hESCs)和人胚胎癌细胞(hECCs)已被广泛用于干细胞研究。虽然已知这些细胞具有许多共同的特性,包括高发育能力和细胞表面抗原,但它们的来源基本不同:hecs来源于囊胚内细胞团,而hecc来自恶性肿瘤。因此,缺乏一种良好的方法来区分这些多能干细胞,仍然是诊断多能干细胞的致瘤潜力并将其用于医学应用的关键问题。在这种情况下,开发特异性标记物来区分hESCs和hECCs也具有临床价值。方法:在本研究中,我们将多糖分析的重点放在富含碳水化合物的糖蛋白podocalyxin上,该糖蛋白被称为TRA-1-60和TRA-1-81抗原的载体,代表hESC聚糖标记。通过免疫沉淀从细胞提取物中富集免疫印迹半定量的靶糖蛋白,并采用先进的凝集素微阵列、抗体覆盖凝集素谱(ALP)技术系统分析hESCs和hECCs之间发生的糖基化差异。我们还分析了从hESCs分化而来的人胚体(hEBs)。结果与结论:hESCs中足霉霉素的聚糖谱与hESCs中有显著差异。α2-6连接唾液酸的凝集素信号在hecs中升高,糖苷酶消化进一步揭示了非还原末端和第二端结构的显著差异。这些结果表明,目前针对特定糖蛋白的方法可以在糖水平上增强密切相关的细胞(如hESCs和hECCs)之间相对较小但显著的差异。本发现将有助于开发一种诊断方法来区分未分化干细胞和用于再生治疗的分化干细胞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信