Awareness and Knowledge of Ergonomics Among Medical Laboratory Scientists in Nigeria

Bh Oladeinde, I. Ekejindu, R. Omoregie, OD Aguh
{"title":"Awareness and Knowledge of Ergonomics Among Medical Laboratory Scientists in Nigeria","authors":"Bh Oladeinde, I. Ekejindu, R. Omoregie, OD Aguh","doi":"10.4103/2141-9248.177989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ergonomics awareness helps in its right application and contributes significantly to general wellbeing and safety of worker at workplace. Aim: This cross-sectional descriptive study aimed at assessing the level of awareness and knowledge of the science of ergonomics among Medical Laboratory Scientists in Benin City, Nigeria. Subjects and Methods: A total of 106 medical laboratory scientists comprising 64 and 42 in public and private laboratories, respectively, were recruited for this study using systematic random sampling technique. Data were obtained from the study participants using a questionnaire and subsequently analyzed with the statistical software INSTAT®. Results: Out of 106 study participants, 27 (25.5%) were reported to have heard of the term ergonomics. Awareness was significantly associated with gender (male vs. female: 38.5% [15/39] vs. 17.9% [12/67]; odds ratio = 2.9; 95% confidence interval = 1.2, 7.1;P = 0.02). Awareness of ergonomics was not significantly affected by affiliation (P = 0.18), area of specialization (P = 0.78), post-qualification experience (P = 0.43), and educational qualification (P = 0.23) of the study participants. Irrespective of the affiliation of the participant, only 6 of 27 (22.2%) participants who were aware of ergonomics knew at least a benefit of right application of ergonomics in the laboratory. Knowledge of risk factors for the development of musculoskeletal disorders was reported by 8 of 27 (29.6%) persons who claimed to be aware of ergonomics. Conclusions: Awareness of ergonomics and knowledge of gains of its right application was poor among the study participants. Regular ergonomic education of medical laboratory scientists in Nigeria is advocated.","PeriodicalId":8186,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research","volume":"125 1","pages":"423 - 427"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.177989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Background: Ergonomics awareness helps in its right application and contributes significantly to general wellbeing and safety of worker at workplace. Aim: This cross-sectional descriptive study aimed at assessing the level of awareness and knowledge of the science of ergonomics among Medical Laboratory Scientists in Benin City, Nigeria. Subjects and Methods: A total of 106 medical laboratory scientists comprising 64 and 42 in public and private laboratories, respectively, were recruited for this study using systematic random sampling technique. Data were obtained from the study participants using a questionnaire and subsequently analyzed with the statistical software INSTAT®. Results: Out of 106 study participants, 27 (25.5%) were reported to have heard of the term ergonomics. Awareness was significantly associated with gender (male vs. female: 38.5% [15/39] vs. 17.9% [12/67]; odds ratio = 2.9; 95% confidence interval = 1.2, 7.1;P = 0.02). Awareness of ergonomics was not significantly affected by affiliation (P = 0.18), area of specialization (P = 0.78), post-qualification experience (P = 0.43), and educational qualification (P = 0.23) of the study participants. Irrespective of the affiliation of the participant, only 6 of 27 (22.2%) participants who were aware of ergonomics knew at least a benefit of right application of ergonomics in the laboratory. Knowledge of risk factors for the development of musculoskeletal disorders was reported by 8 of 27 (29.6%) persons who claimed to be aware of ergonomics. Conclusions: Awareness of ergonomics and knowledge of gains of its right application was poor among the study participants. Regular ergonomic education of medical laboratory scientists in Nigeria is advocated.
尼日利亚医学实验室科学家对人体工程学的认识和知识
背景:人体工程学意识有助于其正确应用,并对工作场所工人的整体健康和安全做出重大贡献。目的:这项横断面描述性研究旨在评估尼日利亚贝宁市医学实验室科学家对人体工程学的认识和知识水平。研究对象和方法:采用系统随机抽样方法,共招募公立和私立实验室医学实验室科学家106人,分别为64人和42人。通过问卷调查获得研究参与者的数据,随后使用统计软件INSTAT®进行分析。结果:在106名研究参与者中,据报道有27人(25.5%)听说过术语人机工程学。意识与性别显著相关(男性vs.女性:38.5% [15/39]vs. 17.9% [12/67];优势比= 2.9;95%置信区间= 1.2,7.1;P = 0.02)。研究参与者的隶属关系(P = 0.18)、专业领域(P = 0.78)、资格证书后经验(P = 0.43)和教育资格(P = 0.23)对人体工程学的认识没有显著影响。无论参与者的隶属关系如何,27名了解人体工程学的参与者中只有6名(22.2%)至少知道在实验室中正确应用人体工程学的好处。27名声称了解人体工程学的人中有8人(29.6%)报告了肌肉骨骼疾病发展的危险因素。结论:研究参与者对人体工程学的认识和对其正确应用收益的了解较差。尼日利亚提倡对医学实验室科学家进行定期的人体工程学教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research
Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信