Identifying the Optimal Age to Perform Newborn Screening for Hearing Loss in Uganda

M. Walsh, E. Redshaw, E. Crossley, C. Phillips
{"title":"Identifying the Optimal Age to Perform Newborn Screening for Hearing Loss in Uganda","authors":"M. Walsh, E. Redshaw, E. Crossley, C. Phillips","doi":"10.4103/2141-9248.177975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Permanent congenital hearing loss affects up to 6/1000 births in developing countries. Currently, in Uganda there is no newborn screening for hearing loss (NSHL) program and no published work on this topic. Within the existing healthcare system there are two opportunities to deliver screening, at birth or 6 weeks of age when infants receive their immunizations. Aim: This study explored the outcomes of otoacoustic emission (OAE) testing in infants at birth and 6 weeks of age, to identify the optimal age for screening. Subjects and Methods: This cross-sectional pilot study recruited 60 consecutive infants from two health centres in Kampala, Uganda. Thirty infants were newborns recruited from the postnatal ward and 30 were aged 4–8 weeks from the immunization clinic, we performed OAE testing on all infants. Results: The results showed 56.7% (17/30) of newborn infants passed OAE testing compared with 90.0% (27/30) of the immunization infants, P < 0.01. Furthermore, of the 11 newborn infants aged ≥24 h of age 90.9% (10/11) passed, compared with the 19 infants <24 h of age where 37% (7/19) passed, P < 0.01. Conclusions: This study demonstrates a higher pass rate for OAE testing for infants ≥24 h of age compared to those <24 h of age. The overall lower pass rate of the newborn infants could be due to external ear debris and middle ear fluid compromising the OAE testing. These findings would support a NSHL programme in Uganda that offers screening to infants ≥24 h of age, to maximize the cost-effectiveness of the program.","PeriodicalId":8186,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research","volume":"5 1","pages":"403 - 408"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.177975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Permanent congenital hearing loss affects up to 6/1000 births in developing countries. Currently, in Uganda there is no newborn screening for hearing loss (NSHL) program and no published work on this topic. Within the existing healthcare system there are two opportunities to deliver screening, at birth or 6 weeks of age when infants receive their immunizations. Aim: This study explored the outcomes of otoacoustic emission (OAE) testing in infants at birth and 6 weeks of age, to identify the optimal age for screening. Subjects and Methods: This cross-sectional pilot study recruited 60 consecutive infants from two health centres in Kampala, Uganda. Thirty infants were newborns recruited from the postnatal ward and 30 were aged 4–8 weeks from the immunization clinic, we performed OAE testing on all infants. Results: The results showed 56.7% (17/30) of newborn infants passed OAE testing compared with 90.0% (27/30) of the immunization infants, P < 0.01. Furthermore, of the 11 newborn infants aged ≥24 h of age 90.9% (10/11) passed, compared with the 19 infants <24 h of age where 37% (7/19) passed, P < 0.01. Conclusions: This study demonstrates a higher pass rate for OAE testing for infants ≥24 h of age compared to those <24 h of age. The overall lower pass rate of the newborn infants could be due to external ear debris and middle ear fluid compromising the OAE testing. These findings would support a NSHL programme in Uganda that offers screening to infants ≥24 h of age, to maximize the cost-effectiveness of the program.
确定在乌干达进行新生儿听力损失筛查的最佳年龄
背景:永久性先天性听力损失影响发展中国家高达6/1000的新生儿。目前,乌干达没有新生儿听力损失筛查(NSHL)项目,也没有关于这一主题的出版工作。在现有的卫生保健系统中,提供筛查的机会有两种:出生时或婴儿在6周大时接受免疫接种。目的:本研究探讨出生及6周龄婴儿耳声发射(OAE)检测结果,以确定筛查的最佳年龄。对象和方法:这项横断面试点研究从乌干达坎帕拉的两个保健中心连续招募了60名婴儿。从产后病房招募30名新生儿,从免疫诊所招募30名4-8周龄婴儿,我们对所有婴儿进行OAE检测。结果:新生儿OAE检测合格率为56.7%(17/30),免疫组为90.0% (27/30),P < 0.01。≥24 h的11例新生儿合格率为90.9% (10/11),<24 h的19例新生儿合格率为37% (7/19),P < 0.01。结论:本研究表明≥24 h的婴儿OAE检测的通过率高于<24 h的婴儿。新生儿总体通过率较低可能是由于外耳碎片和中耳液体影响了OAE测试。这些发现将为乌干达的NSHL项目提供支持,该项目为≥24小时的婴儿提供筛查,以最大限度地提高该项目的成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research
Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信