Antibiotic Resistance of Community and Hospital Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Clinical Specimens

A. Taha, S. Al-Salihi
{"title":"Antibiotic Resistance of Community and Hospital Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Clinical Specimens","authors":"A. Taha, S. Al-Salihi","doi":"10.3844/AMJSP.2011.65.71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem statement: Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is responsible \nfor an increasing number of serious hospital and community acquired infections. Increased emergence \nin MRSA resistance to antibiotics is a growing problem. Approach: The resistance of MRSA to 20 \nantibiotics agents were studied. Also comparison of antibiotics resistance of community and hospital \nacquired MRSA were performed. Meanwhile the profile of antibiotics resistance of different clinical \nspecimens among community and hospital acquired MRSA were evaluated. The clinical specimens of \nwound, urine, diabetic foot, skin abscess and sputum were collected from 1189 patients from March \n2008-2009 at Hawler, Maternity and Rizgary teaching hospitals in Erbil, Iraq, 377 of Staphylococcus \naureus were isolated and identification by standard methods, 114 MRSA were detected by detection \nPBP2a. Antibiotics resistance for MRSA were determined by the agar dilution method according to \nCLSI and BSAC guidelines. Results: The percentages of resistance in all hospital acquired MRSA \nwere higher than community acquired MRSA. Among community acquired MRSA, the highest \npercentage (73.33%) of wound specimens were resistance to tetracycline, erythromycin and \nazithromycin. About 14% of urine samples were resistance to tobramycin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin \nand rifampicin, 12.5% of diabetic foot was resistance to tobramycin, moxifloxacin and rifampicin. The \nresistance to tobramycin and rifampicin among MRSA cause skin abscess were 10 and 75% of sputum \nspecimens were resistance to azithromycin and ciprofloxacin. Among hospital acquired MRSA \nisolates, 92% of wound specimens were resistance to tetracycline, 85.71% of urine samples were \nresistance to erythromycin and azithromycin. All sputum specimens were resistance to erythromycin. \nConclusion/Recommendations: The most antibiotics affected agents MRSA were gatifloxacin, \nmoxifloxacin and rifampicin. Physicians should be aware about MRSA and order for diagnostic and \nantibiotics sensitivity test. The use of antibiotics on random scale without antibiotic sensitivity testing \nmust be restricted.","PeriodicalId":89887,"journal":{"name":"American medical journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"65-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3844/AMJSP.2011.65.71","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3844/AMJSP.2011.65.71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Problem statement: Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is responsible for an increasing number of serious hospital and community acquired infections. Increased emergence in MRSA resistance to antibiotics is a growing problem. Approach: The resistance of MRSA to 20 antibiotics agents were studied. Also comparison of antibiotics resistance of community and hospital acquired MRSA were performed. Meanwhile the profile of antibiotics resistance of different clinical specimens among community and hospital acquired MRSA were evaluated. The clinical specimens of wound, urine, diabetic foot, skin abscess and sputum were collected from 1189 patients from March 2008-2009 at Hawler, Maternity and Rizgary teaching hospitals in Erbil, Iraq, 377 of Staphylococcus aureus were isolated and identification by standard methods, 114 MRSA were detected by detection PBP2a. Antibiotics resistance for MRSA were determined by the agar dilution method according to CLSI and BSAC guidelines. Results: The percentages of resistance in all hospital acquired MRSA were higher than community acquired MRSA. Among community acquired MRSA, the highest percentage (73.33%) of wound specimens were resistance to tetracycline, erythromycin and azithromycin. About 14% of urine samples were resistance to tobramycin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and rifampicin, 12.5% of diabetic foot was resistance to tobramycin, moxifloxacin and rifampicin. The resistance to tobramycin and rifampicin among MRSA cause skin abscess were 10 and 75% of sputum specimens were resistance to azithromycin and ciprofloxacin. Among hospital acquired MRSA isolates, 92% of wound specimens were resistance to tetracycline, 85.71% of urine samples were resistance to erythromycin and azithromycin. All sputum specimens were resistance to erythromycin. Conclusion/Recommendations: The most antibiotics affected agents MRSA were gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin and rifampicin. Physicians should be aware about MRSA and order for diagnostic and antibiotics sensitivity test. The use of antibiotics on random scale without antibiotic sensitivity testing must be restricted.
社区及医院获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌耐药性分析
问题说明:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)是造成越来越多严重的医院和社区获得性感染的原因。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌对抗生素耐药性的增加是一个日益严重的问题。方法:研究MRSA对20种抗生素的耐药性。比较了社区获得性和医院获得性MRSA的耐药情况。同时对社区和医院获得性MRSA不同临床标本的耐药情况进行了评价。对2008年3月至2009年3月在伊拉克埃尔比勒市Hawler、产科和Rizgary教学医院就诊的1189例患者的伤口、尿液、糖尿病足、皮肤脓肿和痰液等临床标本进行采集,采用标准方法分离鉴定金黄色葡萄球菌377例,采用PBP2a检测MRSA 114例。根据CLSI和BSAC指南,采用琼脂稀释法检测MRSA的耐药性。结果:医院获得性MRSA的耐药率高于社区获得性MRSA。社区获得性MRSA中,对四环素、红霉素和阿奇霉素耐药的伤口标本比例最高(73.33%)。约14%的尿样对妥布霉素、左氧氟沙星、莫西沙星和利福平耐药,12.5%的糖尿病足对妥布霉素、莫西沙星和利福平耐药。MRSA引起的皮肤脓肿中对妥布霉素和利福平耐药的占10%,对阿奇霉素和环丙沙星耐药的占75%。医院获得性MRSA分离株中,92%的伤口标本对四环素耐药,85.71%的尿液标本对红霉素和阿奇霉素耐药。所有痰标本均对红霉素耐药。结论/建议:MRSA感染最多的抗生素是加替沙星、莫西沙星和利福平。医生应了解MRSA,并要求进行诊断和抗生素敏感性试验。必须限制在没有进行抗生素敏感性试验的情况下随机使用抗生素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信