Uncertainty sources affecting operational efficiency of ML algorithms in UAV-based precision agriculture: A 2013–2020 systematic review

IF 1.9 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Radhwane Derraz, F. Muharam, Noraini Ahmad Jaafar
{"title":"Uncertainty sources affecting operational efficiency of ML algorithms in UAV-based precision agriculture: A 2013–2020 systematic review","authors":"Radhwane Derraz, F. Muharam, Noraini Ahmad Jaafar","doi":"10.3934/agrfood.2023038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conventional methods of data sampling in agriculture are time consuming, labor intensive, destructive, subject to human error and affected by field conditions. Thus, remote sensing technologies such as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) became widely used as an alternative for data collection. Nevertheless, the big data captured by the UAVs is challenging to interpret. Therefore, machine learning algorithms (MLs) are used to interpret this data. However, the operational efficiency of those MLs is yet to be improved due to different sources affecting their modeling certainty. Therefore, this study aims to review different sources affecting the accuracy of MLs regression and classification interventions in precision agriculture. In this regard, 109 articles were identified in the Scopus database. The search was restricted to articles written in English, published during 2013–2020, and used UAVs as in-field data collection tools and ML algorithms for data analysis and interpretation. This systematic review will be the point of review for researchers to recognize the possible sources affecting the certainty of regression and classification results associated with MLs use. The recognition of those sources points out areas for improvement of MLs performance in precision agriculture. In this review, the performance of MLs is still evaluated in general, which opens the road for further detailed research.","PeriodicalId":44793,"journal":{"name":"AIMS Agriculture and Food","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIMS Agriculture and Food","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2023038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conventional methods of data sampling in agriculture are time consuming, labor intensive, destructive, subject to human error and affected by field conditions. Thus, remote sensing technologies such as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) became widely used as an alternative for data collection. Nevertheless, the big data captured by the UAVs is challenging to interpret. Therefore, machine learning algorithms (MLs) are used to interpret this data. However, the operational efficiency of those MLs is yet to be improved due to different sources affecting their modeling certainty. Therefore, this study aims to review different sources affecting the accuracy of MLs regression and classification interventions in precision agriculture. In this regard, 109 articles were identified in the Scopus database. The search was restricted to articles written in English, published during 2013–2020, and used UAVs as in-field data collection tools and ML algorithms for data analysis and interpretation. This systematic review will be the point of review for researchers to recognize the possible sources affecting the certainty of regression and classification results associated with MLs use. The recognition of those sources points out areas for improvement of MLs performance in precision agriculture. In this review, the performance of MLs is still evaluated in general, which opens the road for further detailed research.
影响无人机精准农业ML算法运行效率的不确定性来源:2013-2020系统综述
传统的农业数据采样方法耗时、劳动密集、具有破坏性、容易出现人为错误,而且受田间条件的影响。因此,诸如无人驾驶飞行器(uav)之类的遥感技术被广泛用作数据收集的替代方法。然而,无人机捕获的大数据很难解释。因此,机器学习算法(ml)被用来解释这些数据。然而,由于不同的来源影响其建模的确定性,这些机器学习的操作效率尚未得到提高。因此,本研究旨在回顾影响精准农业中MLs回归和分类干预准确性的不同来源。在这方面,在Scopus数据库中确定了109篇文章。搜索仅限于2013-2020年期间发表的英文文章,并使用无人机作为现场数据收集工具和ML算法进行数据分析和解释。本系统综述将是研究人员认识到影响与ml使用相关的回归和分类结果确定性的可能来源的综述点。对这些来源的认识指出了在精准农业中机器学习性能有待提高的地方。在这篇综述中,对机器学习的性能仍然进行了一般性的评价,这为进一步的详细研究开辟了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AIMS Agriculture and Food
AIMS Agriculture and Food AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: AIMS Agriculture and Food covers a broad array of topics pertaining to agriculture and food, including, but not limited to:  Agricultural and food production and utilization  Food science and technology  Agricultural and food engineering  Food chemistry and biochemistry  Food materials  Physico-chemical, structural and functional properties of agricultural and food products  Agriculture and the environment  Biorefineries in agricultural and food systems  Food security and novel alternative food sources  Traceability and regional origin of agricultural and food products  Authentication of food and agricultural products  Food safety and food microbiology  Waste reduction in agriculture and food production and processing  Animal science, aquaculture, husbandry and veterinary medicine  Resources utilization and sustainability in food and agricultural production and processing  Horticulture and plant science  Agricultural economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信