{"title":"Nation-World: Autarky and Geo-economics in Montchrétien’s Traicté","authors":"Rosario Patalano","doi":"10.3280/SPE2016-002006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his Traicte de l’oeconomie politique (1615), Antoine de Montchretien proposed a model of development, based on an autarkic economy, formulating analytical and political alternative to increasing integration of world trade, which in the seventeenth century was under Dutch and English hegemony. Montchretien’s response to the problem of world trade integration focused on the establishment of a French colonial empire, completely self-sufficient and closed to international trade. Montchretien proposed an “economic nationalism” connecting politics and the economy, in a perspective that would be called geo-economic, pitting nationalism against globalization to avoid the failure in international trade competition that could threaten the political survival and independence of the country’s national interests. This paper explores the analytical frameworks of Montchretien’s autarkic model, which constitutes an exception in the 17th century literature, which is focused on the idea of commercial supremacy and the gains of trade in a context of international competition.","PeriodicalId":40401,"journal":{"name":"History of Economic Thought and Policy","volume":"1 1","pages":"85-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economic Thought and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/SPE2016-002006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In his Traicte de l’oeconomie politique (1615), Antoine de Montchretien proposed a model of development, based on an autarkic economy, formulating analytical and political alternative to increasing integration of world trade, which in the seventeenth century was under Dutch and English hegemony. Montchretien’s response to the problem of world trade integration focused on the establishment of a French colonial empire, completely self-sufficient and closed to international trade. Montchretien proposed an “economic nationalism” connecting politics and the economy, in a perspective that would be called geo-economic, pitting nationalism against globalization to avoid the failure in international trade competition that could threaten the political survival and independence of the country’s national interests. This paper explores the analytical frameworks of Montchretien’s autarkic model, which constitutes an exception in the 17th century literature, which is focused on the idea of commercial supremacy and the gains of trade in a context of international competition.
安托万·德·蒙克雷蒂安(Antoine de Montchretien)在他的《政治经济学》(Traicte del’oeconomipolitique)(1615)中提出了一种基于自给自足经济的发展模式,为17世纪荷兰和英国霸权下日益一体化的世界贸易制定了分析和政治替代方案。蒙克雷蒂安对世界贸易一体化问题的反应集中在建立一个完全自给自足和封闭于国际贸易的法国殖民帝国。蒙克雷蒂安从地缘经济的角度提出了政治与经济相结合的“经济民族主义”,以民族主义对抗全球化,避免在国际贸易竞争中失败而威胁到国家的政治生存和国家利益的独立性。本文探讨了蒙克雷蒂安自给自足模型的分析框架,这是17世纪文学中的一个例外,它关注的是国际竞争背景下的商业霸权和贸易收益。