Comparing Methods of Estimating Fecal Pellet-Group Density in Woodlots of the Midwest United States

IF 0.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Richard D. Sample, Rylee D. Tomey, Zackary J. Delisle, Alexis R. Trumbower, Phoebe J. Habeck, J. Brooke, M. Jenkins
{"title":"Comparing Methods of Estimating Fecal Pellet-Group Density in Woodlots of the Midwest United States","authors":"Richard D. Sample, Rylee D. Tomey, Zackary J. Delisle, Alexis R. Trumbower, Phoebe J. Habeck, J. Brooke, M. Jenkins","doi":"10.3996/jfwm-21-098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fecal-pellet surveys provide density estimates of pellet groups, which offer a quick and reliable index of population densities for white-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus and other wildlife species. Comparisons of differing fecal-pellet survey methodologies have previously shown that they vary in the precision. However, these comparisons have been made outside of the United States in regions with lower white-tailed deer densities. In this study, we compared pellet-group density estimates and precisions from line-transects, quadrat sampling, and strip-transects. At each site, three observers surveyed simultaneously with each being responsible for one method. Like other studies, we found that each method produced similar estimates of pellet-group density, but quadrat sampling produced the most precise estimates. Furthermore, all three methods suggested that the central region of Indiana had both the highest pellet-group density and the highest precision. Thus, suggesting that pellet groups may be more homogenously distributed in areas with higher white-tailed deer densities, which may increase the precision of all methods. Our results suggest that quadrat sampling may be the most effective method for estimating pellet-group densities within woodlots of the Midwest United States, and that precision may increase in areas with higher white-tailed deer densities. This study not only improves deer management within the Midwest United States but provides guidelines for other studies to potentially advance the conservation and management of other species.","PeriodicalId":49036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3996/jfwm-21-098","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fecal-pellet surveys provide density estimates of pellet groups, which offer a quick and reliable index of population densities for white-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus and other wildlife species. Comparisons of differing fecal-pellet survey methodologies have previously shown that they vary in the precision. However, these comparisons have been made outside of the United States in regions with lower white-tailed deer densities. In this study, we compared pellet-group density estimates and precisions from line-transects, quadrat sampling, and strip-transects. At each site, three observers surveyed simultaneously with each being responsible for one method. Like other studies, we found that each method produced similar estimates of pellet-group density, but quadrat sampling produced the most precise estimates. Furthermore, all three methods suggested that the central region of Indiana had both the highest pellet-group density and the highest precision. Thus, suggesting that pellet groups may be more homogenously distributed in areas with higher white-tailed deer densities, which may increase the precision of all methods. Our results suggest that quadrat sampling may be the most effective method for estimating pellet-group densities within woodlots of the Midwest United States, and that precision may increase in areas with higher white-tailed deer densities. This study not only improves deer management within the Midwest United States but provides guidelines for other studies to potentially advance the conservation and management of other species.
估算美国中西部林地粪便颗粒群密度的比较方法
粪便颗粒调查提供了颗粒群的密度估计,为白尾鹿和其他野生动物物种的种群密度提供了快速可靠的指标。对不同粪便颗粒调查方法的比较先前表明,它们在精度上有所不同。然而,这些比较是在美国以外白尾鹿密度较低的地区进行的。在这项研究中,我们比较了线样条、样方采样和条样条的颗粒群密度估计和精度。在每个地点,三名观察员同时进行调查,每人负责一种方法。与其他研究一样,我们发现每种方法对颗粒群密度的估计都相似,但样方抽样产生了最精确的估计。此外,所有三种方法都表明,印第安纳州中部地区的颗粒群密度和精度都最高。因此,提示颗粒群在白尾鹿密度较高的地区可能分布更为均匀,这可能提高所有方法的精度。我们的研究结果表明,样方抽样可能是估计美国中西部林地中颗粒群密度的最有效方法,并且在白尾鹿密度较高的地区,精度可能会提高。这项研究不仅改善了美国中西部地区的鹿管理,而且为其他研究提供了指导,以潜在地促进其他物种的保护和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management
Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-ECOLOGY
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management encourages submission of original, high quality, English-language scientific papers on the practical application and integration of science to conservation and management of native North American fish, wildlife, plants and their habitats in the following categories: Articles, Notes, Surveys and Issues and Perspectives. Papers that do not relate directly to native North American fish, wildlife plants or their habitats may be considered if they highlight species that are closely related to, or conservation issues that are germane to, those in North America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信