Management of an Aquifer Threatened by Saltwater Intrusion: Borrowing from Pollution Control Strategies

Allison Woolverton
{"title":"Management of an Aquifer Threatened by Saltwater Intrusion: Borrowing from Pollution Control Strategies","authors":"Allison Woolverton","doi":"10.4079/pp.v29i0.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a region that is surrounded by multiple bodies of water, inundated by seasonal rains, and threatened by floods, water is not a resource that South Louisianians often think much about over consuming. However, over-pumping threatens one of the state’s largest groundwater reserves and sources of high-quality drinking water: the Southern Hills Aquifer System, which provides valuable freshwater supply to over 44,000 residents. This analysis assesses the relative effectiveness of three policy measures that could be implemented to limit saltwater intrusion into the aquifer: a cap-and-trade scheme for pumping permits, a tax on the water withdrawn, and a subsidy for industrial users not to withdraw. While each policy measure has both strengths and weaknesses in its ability to mitigate saltwater intrusion, a cap-and-trade scheme is the most feasible for the aquifer. The availability of data from the aquifer’s regulatory body, the high costs of conducting further studies, and the difficulty of measuring the numerous and extensive social and environmental externalities associated with over-extraction from the aquifer make the cap-and-trade scheme the most feasible of the three policy measures in this analysis.","PeriodicalId":30465,"journal":{"name":"Policy Perspectives","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4079/pp.v29i0.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a region that is surrounded by multiple bodies of water, inundated by seasonal rains, and threatened by floods, water is not a resource that South Louisianians often think much about over consuming. However, over-pumping threatens one of the state’s largest groundwater reserves and sources of high-quality drinking water: the Southern Hills Aquifer System, which provides valuable freshwater supply to over 44,000 residents. This analysis assesses the relative effectiveness of three policy measures that could be implemented to limit saltwater intrusion into the aquifer: a cap-and-trade scheme for pumping permits, a tax on the water withdrawn, and a subsidy for industrial users not to withdraw. While each policy measure has both strengths and weaknesses in its ability to mitigate saltwater intrusion, a cap-and-trade scheme is the most feasible for the aquifer. The availability of data from the aquifer’s regulatory body, the high costs of conducting further studies, and the difficulty of measuring the numerous and extensive social and environmental externalities associated with over-extraction from the aquifer make the cap-and-trade scheme the most feasible of the three policy measures in this analysis.
受盐水入侵威胁的含水层管理:借鉴污染控制策略
在一个被多个水体包围的地区,被季节性降雨淹没,并受到洪水的威胁,水不是南路易斯安那人经常考虑的过度消耗的资源。然而,过度抽水威胁到该州最大的地下水储备和高质量饮用水来源之一:南山含水层系统,该系统为44,000多名居民提供宝贵的淡水供应。本分析评估了三种可以实施的政策措施的相对有效性,以限制咸水侵入含水层:抽水许可的限额与交易计划,对抽取的水征税,以及对不抽取的工业用户提供补贴。虽然每一项政策措施在减轻盐水入侵的能力上都各有优缺点,但限额与交易计划对含水层来说是最可行的。从含水层管理机构获得的数据,进行进一步研究的高成本,以及难以衡量与过度开采含水层有关的大量广泛的社会和环境外部性,使限额与交易计划成为本分析中三种政策措施中最可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书