Organic and Conventional Grape Growing in Italy: a Technical Efficiency Comparison Using a Parametric Approach

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
F. Cisilino, F. Madau, R. Furesi, P. Pulina, Brunella Arru
{"title":"Organic and Conventional Grape Growing in Italy: a Technical Efficiency Comparison Using a Parametric Approach","authors":"F. Cisilino, F. Madau, R. Furesi, P. Pulina, Brunella Arru","doi":"10.36253/wep-10384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several studies have focused attention on the differences between organic and conventional farms in terms of efficiency, and controversial findings have resulted from these applications. One source of controversy concerns the assumption about the frontier(s) adopted for the comparison: a common frontier or two separate frontiers for organic and conventional methods? This paper aims to estimate technical efficiency in Italian grape farming. A stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) was applied to a sample of 531 farms (440 conventional and 91 organic farms) collected from the Farm Accountancy Network Database. Among others, a test for evaluating whether a unique or separate frontier was performed. The findings suggest that organic and conventional farms would lie on a common frontier and that organic farms have greater capacity than conventional farms in using their own technical inputs (efficiency amounts to 83.6% and 77.8%, respectively). A number of implications derive from these findings.","PeriodicalId":38081,"journal":{"name":"Wine Economics and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wine Economics and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-10384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Several studies have focused attention on the differences between organic and conventional farms in terms of efficiency, and controversial findings have resulted from these applications. One source of controversy concerns the assumption about the frontier(s) adopted for the comparison: a common frontier or two separate frontiers for organic and conventional methods? This paper aims to estimate technical efficiency in Italian grape farming. A stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) was applied to a sample of 531 farms (440 conventional and 91 organic farms) collected from the Farm Accountancy Network Database. Among others, a test for evaluating whether a unique or separate frontier was performed. The findings suggest that organic and conventional farms would lie on a common frontier and that organic farms have greater capacity than conventional farms in using their own technical inputs (efficiency amounts to 83.6% and 77.8%, respectively). A number of implications derive from these findings.
意大利有机和传统葡萄种植:使用参数方法的技术效率比较
一些研究将注意力集中在有机农场和传统农场在效率方面的差异上,这些应用产生了有争议的发现。争议的一个来源是关于比较所采用的边界的假设:有机方法和传统方法的共同边界还是两个单独的边界?本文旨在估计意大利葡萄种植的技术效率。随机前沿分析(SFA)应用于从农场会计网络数据库中收集的531个农场(440个传统农场和91个有机农场)的样本。在其他测试中,用于评估是否执行了唯一或单独的边界。研究结果表明,有机农场和传统农场将处于共同的边界,有机农场比传统农场更有能力利用自己的技术投入(效率分别为83.6%和77.8%)。这些发现产生了许多启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wine Economics and Policy
Wine Economics and Policy Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信