Le visage, dans la trace de l’Absent : comme dire/dé-dire le mot « Dieu »

Yod Pub Date : 2010-01-01 DOI:10.4000/YOD.678
Orietta Ombrosi
{"title":"Le visage, dans la trace de l’Absent : comme dire/dé-dire le mot « Dieu »","authors":"Orietta Ombrosi","doi":"10.4000/YOD.678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This interpretation aims to comment upon a few passages from the essay “La trace de l’autre,” 1963, written by Levinas for a journal and included in En decouvrant l’existence avec Husserl et Heidegger (1967) and subsequently in Humanisme de l’autre homme (1972). In this text, “God” is conceived as absolutely distant from the question of his existence or non-existence, which must however be traced back to his significance and, in particular, to the meaning of the name that enunciates him, the word “God.” Here, in short, we refer to that measureless idea expressed by the excessive term of “God.” In any case, this is not an argument that Levinas – and I with him – formulate as a theologian (as one may expect), but rather as an unfaithful phenomenologist, who aims to find “the phenomenological concreteness” in which the word “God” acquires significance, such as the concreteness of the “face” or of the “trace”.","PeriodicalId":53276,"journal":{"name":"Yod","volume":"15 1","pages":"261-276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yod","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/YOD.678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This interpretation aims to comment upon a few passages from the essay “La trace de l’autre,” 1963, written by Levinas for a journal and included in En decouvrant l’existence avec Husserl et Heidegger (1967) and subsequently in Humanisme de l’autre homme (1972). In this text, “God” is conceived as absolutely distant from the question of his existence or non-existence, which must however be traced back to his significance and, in particular, to the meaning of the name that enunciates him, the word “God.” Here, in short, we refer to that measureless idea expressed by the excessive term of “God.” In any case, this is not an argument that Levinas – and I with him – formulate as a theologian (as one may expect), but rather as an unfaithful phenomenologist, who aims to find “the phenomenological concreteness” in which the word “God” acquires significance, such as the concreteness of the “face” or of the “trace”.
脸,在缺席的痕迹:如何说/否认“上帝”这个词
这种解释的目的是对列维纳斯1963年为一份杂志写的文章《生命轨迹》中的一些段落进行评论,这篇文章被收录在《胡塞尔和海德格尔的分离》(1967)和随后的《人类主义》(1972)中。在这篇文章中,“上帝”被认为是绝对远离他存在或不存在的问题,但这必须追溯到他的意义,尤其是他的名字的意义,即“上帝”这个词。简而言之,这里我们指的是用“上帝”这个过分的名词来表达的那种无限的观念。无论如何,这不是列维纳斯——以及我和他一起——作为一个神学家(正如人们所期望的那样)提出的一个论点,而是作为一个不忠实的现象学家,他的目标是找到“现象学的具体性”,在这个现象学的具体性中,“上帝”这个词获得了意义,比如“脸”或“痕迹”的具体性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Yod
Yod
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信