The Effects of Procedural Justice and Distributive Justice Criteria on Secondary School Teachers

S. Ferdinand
{"title":"The Effects of Procedural Justice and Distributive Justice Criteria on Secondary School Teachers","authors":"S. Ferdinand","doi":"10.3860/PJP.V39I1.102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the effects of procedural justice and distributive justice criteria on fairness appraisal. Two hundred thirty nine high school teachers from Bulacan, Cavite, and Pasig City participated. They rated the fairness of two justice scenarios, one organizational and one educational, each containing a procedural justice criterion (voice) and a distributive justice criterion (equity). Analyses of variance were performed. The results showed that process and distribution interact differently in the two scenarios-distributive justice affects fairness appraisal in the organization scenario while procedural justice affects fairness appraisal in the education scenario. These results indicate that as receivers of justice decisions, the participants are influenced by outcomes in appraising the fairness of a situation while as makers of decisions, they are influenced by processes.","PeriodicalId":90678,"journal":{"name":"Philippine journal of psychology","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philippine journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3860/PJP.V39I1.102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of procedural justice and distributive justice criteria on fairness appraisal. Two hundred thirty nine high school teachers from Bulacan, Cavite, and Pasig City participated. They rated the fairness of two justice scenarios, one organizational and one educational, each containing a procedural justice criterion (voice) and a distributive justice criterion (equity). Analyses of variance were performed. The results showed that process and distribution interact differently in the two scenarios-distributive justice affects fairness appraisal in the organization scenario while procedural justice affects fairness appraisal in the education scenario. These results indicate that as receivers of justice decisions, the participants are influenced by outcomes in appraising the fairness of a situation while as makers of decisions, they are influenced by processes.
程序公正与分配公正标准对中学教师的影响
本研究探讨了程序公正和分配公正标准对公平评价的影响。来自布拉干、卡维特和帕西格市的239名高中教师参加了这次活动。他们对两种司法情景的公平性进行了评级,一种是组织的,另一种是教育的,每一种都包含程序正义标准(声音)和分配正义标准(公平)。进行方差分析。结果表明,在两种情境下,过程与分配的交互作用存在差异,在组织情境下,分配公正影响公平评价,在教育情境下,程序公正影响公平评价。这些结果表明,作为正义决策的接受者,参与者在评估情况的公平性时受到结果的影响,而作为决策的制定者,他们受到过程的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书