A cross-lagged study on health risk perception and life consciousness in college students during the COVID-19 epidemic.

何苗 叶子瑜 田依林
{"title":"A cross-lagged study on health risk perception and life consciousness in college students during the COVID-19 epidemic.","authors":"何苗 叶子瑜 田依林","doi":"10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2021.10.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To explore the relationship between health risk perception and life consciousness in college students during the COVID-19 epidemic. Methods: A total of 320 college students were assessed twice at 6- month intervals with the Health Risk Perception Scale (HRPS) and Questionnaire of Life Consciousness for College Students (QLCCS). The subjects were divided into middle and high-risk areas group (n = 165) and low-risk areas group (n = 131) according to the COVID-19 epidemic risk level of their location. A structural equation model was established to analyze the cross-lag effect of HRPS score and QLCCS score, and the group difference test was conducted to reveal the inter-group difference. Results: The baseline HRPS scores were lower in the middle and highrisk areas group than in the low-risk areas group (P < 0. 05) . After 6 months, the HRPS scores decreased, and the QLCCS scores increased in both groups (Ps < 0. 05). In the cross-lagged model analysis, the baseline HRPS scores positively associated with the QLCCS scores 6 months later (β = 0. 22), while the baseline QLCCS scores positively associated with the HRPS scores 6 months later (β = 0. 15). There was difference in the relationship between HRPS scores and QLCCS scores between two groups (Δχ² = 9. 28, P < 0. 05). Conclusion: During the COVID-19 epidemic, the health risk perception and life consciousness of college students are associated with interaction, and the relationship between them is affected by regional risk level. (English) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] 目的:探讨新冠肺炎流行期间大学生健康风险感知与生命意识的关系。方法:选取 320 名大 学生,采用健康风险感知量表(HRPS)、大学生生命意识调查表 (QLCCS)间隔 6 个月进行 2 次测查;根 据被试所在地新冠肺炎疫情风险等级,分为中高风险地区组(n=165)与低风险地区组(n=131)。建立 结构方程模型分析 HRPS 总分与 QLCCS 总分的交叉滞后效应并进行群组差异检验。结果:中高风险地区组 基线 HRPS 总分低于低风险地区组;两组 6个月后 HRPS总分均降低,QLCCS 总分均提高(均 P < 0. 05)。 基线 HRPS 总分正向预测6个月后 QLCCS 总分(β=0.22)、基线 QLCCS 总分正向预测6个月后 HRPS 总 分(β=0.15),HRPS 总分与 QLCCS 总分的关系在中高风险地区组与低风险地区组之间存在差异(Δχ2= 9.28,P < 0. 05)。结论:新冠肺炎流行期间,大学生的健康风险感知与生命意识交互预测,二者关系受地 区风险等级的影响。 (Chinese) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Chinese Mental Health Journal / Zhongguo Xinli Weisheng Zazhi is the property of Chinese Mental Health Journal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)","PeriodicalId":10158,"journal":{"name":"中国心理卫生杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国心理卫生杂志","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2021.10.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: To explore the relationship between health risk perception and life consciousness in college students during the COVID-19 epidemic. Methods: A total of 320 college students were assessed twice at 6- month intervals with the Health Risk Perception Scale (HRPS) and Questionnaire of Life Consciousness for College Students (QLCCS). The subjects were divided into middle and high-risk areas group (n = 165) and low-risk areas group (n = 131) according to the COVID-19 epidemic risk level of their location. A structural equation model was established to analyze the cross-lag effect of HRPS score and QLCCS score, and the group difference test was conducted to reveal the inter-group difference. Results: The baseline HRPS scores were lower in the middle and highrisk areas group than in the low-risk areas group (P < 0. 05) . After 6 months, the HRPS scores decreased, and the QLCCS scores increased in both groups (Ps < 0. 05). In the cross-lagged model analysis, the baseline HRPS scores positively associated with the QLCCS scores 6 months later (β = 0. 22), while the baseline QLCCS scores positively associated with the HRPS scores 6 months later (β = 0. 15). There was difference in the relationship between HRPS scores and QLCCS scores between two groups (Δχ² = 9. 28, P < 0. 05). Conclusion: During the COVID-19 epidemic, the health risk perception and life consciousness of college students are associated with interaction, and the relationship between them is affected by regional risk level. (English) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] 目的:探讨新冠肺炎流行期间大学生健康风险感知与生命意识的关系。方法:选取 320 名大 学生,采用健康风险感知量表(HRPS)、大学生生命意识调查表 (QLCCS)间隔 6 个月进行 2 次测查;根 据被试所在地新冠肺炎疫情风险等级,分为中高风险地区组(n=165)与低风险地区组(n=131)。建立 结构方程模型分析 HRPS 总分与 QLCCS 总分的交叉滞后效应并进行群组差异检验。结果:中高风险地区组 基线 HRPS 总分低于低风险地区组;两组 6个月后 HRPS总分均降低,QLCCS 总分均提高(均 P < 0. 05)。 基线 HRPS 总分正向预测6个月后 QLCCS 总分(β=0.22)、基线 QLCCS 总分正向预测6个月后 HRPS 总 分(β=0.15),HRPS 总分与 QLCCS 总分的关系在中高风险地区组与低风险地区组之间存在差异(Δχ2= 9.28,P < 0. 05)。结论:新冠肺炎流行期间,大学生的健康风险感知与生命意识交互预测,二者关系受地 区风险等级的影响。 (Chinese) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Chinese Mental Health Journal / Zhongguo Xinli Weisheng Zazhi is the property of Chinese Mental Health Journal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
新冠肺炎疫情期间大学生健康风险感知与生命意识的交叉滞后研究
目的:探讨新冠肺炎疫情期间大学生健康风险感知与生命意识的关系。方法:采用健康风险感知量表(HRPS)和大学生生命意识问卷(QLCCS),每隔6个月对320名大学生进行2次评估。根据受试者所在地区的新冠肺炎流行风险水平将其分为中高危地区组(165例)和低危地区组(131例)。建立结构方程模型分析HRPS评分与QLCCS评分的交叉滞后效应,并进行组间差异检验,揭示组间差异。结果:中高危区组HRPS基线评分低于低危区组(P < 0.05)。05) . 6个月后,两组HRPS评分均下降,QLCCS评分均升高(p < 0.05)。05). 在交叉滞后模型分析中,基线HRPS评分与6个月后的QLCCS评分呈正相关(β = 0。而基线QLCCS评分与6个月后的HRPS评分呈正相关(β = 0。15)。两组HRPS评分与QLCCS评分的关系有差异(Δχ²= 9)。28, p < 0。05). 结论:2019冠状病毒病疫情期间,大学生健康风险感知与生命意识存在交互作用,二者关系受区域风险水平影响。从作者(英文)[摘要]目的:探讨新冠肺炎流行期间大学生健康风险感知与生命意识的关系。方法:选取320名大学生,采用健康风险感知量表(合),大学生生命意识调查表(QLCCS)间隔6个月进行2次测查,根据被试所在地新冠肺炎疫情风险等级,分为中高风险地区组(n = 165)与低风险地区组(n = 131)。建立结构方程模型分析合总分与QLCCS总分的交叉滞后效应并进行群组差异检验。结果:中高风险地区组基线合总分低于低风险地区组,两组6个月后合总分均降低,QLCCS总分均提高(均P < 0。05)。 基线合总分正向预测6个月后QLCCS总分(β= 0.22),基线QLCCS总分正向预测6个月后合总分(β= 0.15),合总分与QLCCS总分的关系在中高风险地区组与低风险地区组之间存在差异(Δχ2 = 9.28,P < 0。05)。结论:新冠肺炎流行期间,大学生的健康风险感知与生命意识交互预测,二者关系受地 区风险等级的影响。 《中国精神卫生杂志》版权所有,未经著作权人明确书面许可,其内容不得复制、电邮至多个网站或在列表中发布。但是,用户可以打印、下载或通过电子邮件发送文章供个人使用。这篇摘要可以删节。对副本的准确性不作任何保证。用户应参考资料的原始出版版本以获取完整摘要。(版权适用于所有摘要。)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7602
期刊介绍: Chinese Mental Health Journal is a national level academic journal in the field of psychology, approved by the State Administration of Press and Publication, supervised by the China Association for Science and Technology, and sponsored by the China Mental Health Association. The establishment of the Chinese Journal of Mental Health was in 1987, with a monthly publication cycle. The domestic unified serial number of the journal is 11-1873/R, and the international standard serial number is 1000-6729. Literature database inclusion status: Overview of Chinese Core Journals (Peking University Library, etc.). China Science Citation Database (Core Database) (CSCD) (National Science Library of the Chinese Academy of Sciences). China Science and Technology Paper and Citation Database (CSTPCD) (China Institute of Science and Technology Information). Outline of Core Journals of Chinese Humanities and Social Sciences (CASS) (Chinese Academy of Social Sciences). The important reprint source journals of "copying newspapers and periodicals" (Research Center for Evaluation of Academic Achievements of Humanities and Social Sciences, Renmin University of China, etc.). Chinese Social Science Citation Index (CSSCI) (China Social Science Research Evaluation Center, Nanjing University). Chinese Biomedical Journal Citation Database (CMCI), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database Online (CBMDISC), Chinese Biomedical Journal Literature Database (CMCC), Chinese Academic Journal Abstracts, Chinese Science and Technology Data Catalog, etc. Ulrich's Periodic Directory in the United States. JST Japan Science and Technology Agency Database (Japan) (2018). The full text electronic version is authorized to be included in the China Journal Full Text Special Database (CNKI), Wanfang Data, China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP Full Text Electronic Journal), and EBSCO Literature Database in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信