Comparison of levetiracetam and sodium valproate monotherapy in childhood epilepsy-An open label randomized trial

Swati Bhayana, A. Aggarwal, M. Narang, Sangeeta Sharma, R. Malhotra
{"title":"Comparison of levetiracetam and sodium valproate monotherapy in childhood epilepsy-An open label randomized trial","authors":"Swati Bhayana, A. Aggarwal, M. Narang, Sangeeta Sharma, R. Malhotra","doi":"10.35841/0971-9032.357-361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To compare the efficacy of oral levetiracetam and valproate in childhood epilepsy by comparing number of repeat seizures for 6 months, side effect profile, retention rates and time to first seizure. Setting-The study was conducted in tertiary care hospital of North India. Participants-Hundred children, 3-12 years of newly diagnosed epilepsy (generalised or focal motor). Intervention-Children were randomly allocated to receive oral valproate or levetiracetam in a dose of 20 mg/kg/day after initial loading dose (n=50 in each group). Drug levels were estimated by ELISA method at steady state, end of therapy and in case of any seizure activity. Side effect and repeat seizures were recorded till 6 months. Outcome measures-No repeat seizure activity for 6 months, side effect profile, achievement of therapeutic drug levels at steady state and 6 months were studied. Results: Two groups were comparable in basic demographic data. In 6 months, 8 children in valproate group and 12 in levetiracetam gr oup had r epeat seizur e (p=0.317). Mean time to first seizur e was similar in two groups (p=0.930). Mean survival time was 145.16(127.39 ± 162.93) days with levetiracetam and 159.80(145.77 ± 173.82) with valproate. The hazard ratio of valproate for treatment failure was lower. There was 38% more reduction in hazard of treatment failure with valproate compared to levetiracetam though not statistically significant (p=0.297). Overall side effects were comparable (p=0.341). Behavioural side effects were significantly more with levetiracetam (p=0.021). Conclusion: First line therapy with oral levetiracetam or valproate is comparable in efficacy and side effects in childhood epilepsy.","PeriodicalId":11183,"journal":{"name":"Current Pediatric Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"357-361"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Pediatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35841/0971-9032.357-361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of oral levetiracetam and valproate in childhood epilepsy by comparing number of repeat seizures for 6 months, side effect profile, retention rates and time to first seizure. Setting-The study was conducted in tertiary care hospital of North India. Participants-Hundred children, 3-12 years of newly diagnosed epilepsy (generalised or focal motor). Intervention-Children were randomly allocated to receive oral valproate or levetiracetam in a dose of 20 mg/kg/day after initial loading dose (n=50 in each group). Drug levels were estimated by ELISA method at steady state, end of therapy and in case of any seizure activity. Side effect and repeat seizures were recorded till 6 months. Outcome measures-No repeat seizure activity for 6 months, side effect profile, achievement of therapeutic drug levels at steady state and 6 months were studied. Results: Two groups were comparable in basic demographic data. In 6 months, 8 children in valproate group and 12 in levetiracetam gr oup had r epeat seizur e (p=0.317). Mean time to first seizur e was similar in two groups (p=0.930). Mean survival time was 145.16(127.39 ± 162.93) days with levetiracetam and 159.80(145.77 ± 173.82) with valproate. The hazard ratio of valproate for treatment failure was lower. There was 38% more reduction in hazard of treatment failure with valproate compared to levetiracetam though not statistically significant (p=0.297). Overall side effects were comparable (p=0.341). Behavioural side effects were significantly more with levetiracetam (p=0.021). Conclusion: First line therapy with oral levetiracetam or valproate is comparable in efficacy and side effects in childhood epilepsy.
左乙拉西坦与丙戊酸钠单药治疗儿童癫痫的比较——一项开放标签随机试验
目的:比较口服左乙拉西坦与丙戊酸钠治疗儿童癫痫6个月重复发作次数、副作用特征、保留率和首次发作时间。研究环境:本研究在印度北部三级医院进行。参与者:100名儿童,3-12岁新诊断癫痫(全身性或局灶性运动)。干预措施-儿童在初始负荷剂量后随机分配口服丙戊酸盐或左乙拉西坦,剂量为20mg /kg/天(每组n=50)。采用酶联免疫吸附法测定稳态、治疗结束和癫痫发作时的药物水平。6个月前记录不良反应及反复发作。结果测量:研究6个月内无重复癫痫发作活动,副作用概况,在稳定状态和6个月内达到治疗药物水平。结果:两组基本人口学资料具有可比性。在6个月内,丙戊酸组8例,左乙拉西坦组12例患儿再次发生癫痫发作(p=0.317)。两组平均首次发作时间差异无统计学意义(p=0.930)。左乙拉西坦组平均生存时间为145.16(127.39±162.93)天,丙戊酸酯组平均生存时间为159.80(145.77±173.82)天。丙戊酸钠治疗失败的风险比较低。与左乙拉西坦相比,丙戊酸治疗失败的风险降低了38%,但没有统计学意义(p=0.297)。总体副作用具有可比性(p=0.341)。左乙拉西坦组行为副作用显著增加(p=0.021)。结论:口服左乙拉西坦或丙戊酸钠一线治疗儿童癫痫的疗效和副作用相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Pediatric Research
Current Pediatric Research Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: Current Pediatric Research is an interdisciplinary Research Journal for publication of original research work in all major disciplines of Pediatric Research. The objective of the journal is to provide a scientific communication medium to discuss the utmost advancements in the domain of Pediatric Research. This journal aims to assemble and reserve precise, specific, detailed data on this immensely diversified subject. Current Pediatric Research is scientific open access journal that specifies the development activities conducted in the field of pediatric research. This journal encompasses the study related to different diversified aspects in pediatric research such as Pediatric Nursing, pediatric emergency care, pediatric nephrology, pediatric pulmonology, pediatric psychology, pediatric dental care, pediatric diabetes, pediatric stroke, pediatric healthcare, pediatric congenital heart disease, pediatric trauma and many more relevant fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信