Incidence and etiological agents of concomitant acute bacterial meningitis in neonates with febrile urinary tract infection.

Fatma S. Alzhrani, Fayza Al Siny, Sumaih Abdullah Alsadiq, Mai Mohammed Ghaith, Nouf Nawaf Simsim, Noha Hassan Kommosani, Wejdan H A Al-Qahtani
{"title":"Incidence and etiological agents of concomitant acute bacterial meningitis in neonates with febrile urinary tract infection.","authors":"Fatma S. Alzhrani, Fayza Al Siny, Sumaih Abdullah Alsadiq, Mai Mohammed Ghaith, Nouf Nawaf Simsim, Noha Hassan Kommosani, Wejdan H A Al-Qahtani","doi":"10.35841/0971-9032.25.2.324-327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Concomitant Acute Bacterial Meningitis (ABM) in febrile neonates with Urinary TractInfection (UTI) considered a severe condition that may lead to permanent disabilities if it is not treatedcorrectly. In order to understand the real burden of this problem, we aimed to investigate theincidence rate of the concomitant ABM in neonates with febrile UTI. Methods: This is a retrospective study reviewing the medical records of all neonates who werepresented to the Emergency Department (ED) in a tertiary hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia from 1 Mayto 31 July 2019 and diagnosed with UTI to look if they had a diagnosis of acute bacterial meningitis ornot. Result: from 159 pediatric patients presented with UTIs, there were 3 (1.9%) patients with bacterialmeningitis, two of them were males. For the neonatal age, 49 neonates presented with UTI, only onepatient (2%) was diagnosed with bacterial meningitis. The isolated organisms that caused meningitiswere: yeast, Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae), Escherichia coli (E.coli). Conclusion: Even though our findings suggest that the incidence of ABM among neonates who haveUTI is relatively low, it still exists, and clinicians should consider them at the same time cliniciansshould balance between benefit and harm of doing lumbar puncture to every febrile neonate. A largersample and multicenter studies must be conducted in the future to look for the issue explicitly and tomake the result applicable to the whole population.","PeriodicalId":11183,"journal":{"name":"Current Pediatric Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"324-327"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Pediatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35841/0971-9032.25.2.324-327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Concomitant Acute Bacterial Meningitis (ABM) in febrile neonates with Urinary TractInfection (UTI) considered a severe condition that may lead to permanent disabilities if it is not treatedcorrectly. In order to understand the real burden of this problem, we aimed to investigate theincidence rate of the concomitant ABM in neonates with febrile UTI. Methods: This is a retrospective study reviewing the medical records of all neonates who werepresented to the Emergency Department (ED) in a tertiary hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia from 1 Mayto 31 July 2019 and diagnosed with UTI to look if they had a diagnosis of acute bacterial meningitis ornot. Result: from 159 pediatric patients presented with UTIs, there were 3 (1.9%) patients with bacterialmeningitis, two of them were males. For the neonatal age, 49 neonates presented with UTI, only onepatient (2%) was diagnosed with bacterial meningitis. The isolated organisms that caused meningitiswere: yeast, Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae), Escherichia coli (E.coli). Conclusion: Even though our findings suggest that the incidence of ABM among neonates who haveUTI is relatively low, it still exists, and clinicians should consider them at the same time cliniciansshould balance between benefit and harm of doing lumbar puncture to every febrile neonate. A largersample and multicenter studies must be conducted in the future to look for the issue explicitly and tomake the result applicable to the whole population.
新生儿发热性尿路感染并发急性细菌性脑膜炎的发病率及病因分析。
背景:伴有尿路感染(UTI)的发热新生儿并发急性细菌性脑膜炎(ABM)被认为是一种严重的疾病,如果治疗不当可能导致永久性残疾。为了了解这一问题的真正负担,我们旨在调查新生儿发热性尿路感染并发ABM的发生率。方法:本研究是一项回顾性研究,回顾了2019年5月1日至7月31日在沙特阿拉伯吉达一家三级医院急诊科(ED)就诊并诊断为尿路感染的所有新生儿的医疗记录,以观察他们是否被诊断为急性细菌性脑膜炎。结果:159例尿路感染患儿中,细菌性脑膜炎3例(1.9%),其中2例为男性。在新生儿年龄方面,49例新生儿出现尿路感染,只有1例(2%)被诊断为细菌性脑膜炎。分离出的引起脑膜炎的生物有:酵母菌、肺炎克雷伯菌(克雷伯菌)、大肠杆菌(大肠杆菌)。结论:尽管我们的研究结果表明尿路感染新生儿中ABM的发生率相对较低,但它仍然存在,临床医生应考虑到这一点,同时临床医生应权衡对每个发热新生儿进行腰椎穿刺的利与弊。未来必须进行更大样本和多中心的研究,以明确地寻找问题,并使结果适用于整个人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Pediatric Research
Current Pediatric Research Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: Current Pediatric Research is an interdisciplinary Research Journal for publication of original research work in all major disciplines of Pediatric Research. The objective of the journal is to provide a scientific communication medium to discuss the utmost advancements in the domain of Pediatric Research. This journal aims to assemble and reserve precise, specific, detailed data on this immensely diversified subject. Current Pediatric Research is scientific open access journal that specifies the development activities conducted in the field of pediatric research. This journal encompasses the study related to different diversified aspects in pediatric research such as Pediatric Nursing, pediatric emergency care, pediatric nephrology, pediatric pulmonology, pediatric psychology, pediatric dental care, pediatric diabetes, pediatric stroke, pediatric healthcare, pediatric congenital heart disease, pediatric trauma and many more relevant fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信