Shear Bond Strengths of 3 Commonly Used Orthodontic Adhesives

Q4 Dentistry
S. Shams, S. Abela, M. Andiappan, Alireza Hajiheshmati, D. Bister
{"title":"Shear Bond Strengths of 3 Commonly Used Orthodontic Adhesives","authors":"S. Shams, S. Abela, M. Andiappan, Alireza Hajiheshmati, D. Bister","doi":"10.35248/2161-1122.20.10.568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the Shear Bond Strengths (SBS) of three types of orthodontic adhesives and to compare the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) after debonding. Materials and Methods: One hundred and seventy-four upper central incisors were extracted and randomly divided to 6 groups (n=29) based on the type of adhesive and two-time intervals post bonding (30 minutes (T1) and 24 hours (T2)): 1) Transbond XT™ 2) BracePaste®, 3) GoTo™. Stainless steel orthodontic brackets were bonded to the teeth. Debonding was completed by an instron machine and shear bond strength recorded together with the ARI following examination under stereo optical microscope with magnification of 10x. Normal distribution was tested using histograms, box plots, the Shapiro-Wilks test and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov’s test. The linear correlation between shear bond strength and ARI score was measured using Pearson’s correlation coefficient by individual test groups and for pooled data. To examine significance of ARI score by group multiple chi-square testing was used. All the analyses were carried out using SPSS version 25.0 and Stata version 15.0. Results: The bond strength of Transbond XT™ was the highest and the strengths at T1 and T2 were not statistically different. The statistical significance was set at 5%. The bond strength of GoTo™ adhesive significantly increased from T1 (200.49N ± 49.77) to T2 (234.89N ± 39.83). BracePaste® showed a statistically significant reduction of its bond strength after 24 hours; 165.07 ± 22.56, down from 187.40N ± 36.90 at T1. This was also significantly less than for the former two adhesives. Water ageing of 24 hrs had a positive impact on Transbond™ and GoTo™ but a negative one on BracePaste®. Transbond XT™ showed the highest score of 3 for ARI at T1 70% and T2 46% followed by GoTo 52% and 35% and BracePaste® 48% and 33%. Conclusion: Transbond XT™ and GoTo™ adhesives showed superior SBS at T1 and showed statistically higher SBS at T2 than for BracePaste®","PeriodicalId":37056,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry 3000","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry 3000","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2161-1122.20.10.568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the Shear Bond Strengths (SBS) of three types of orthodontic adhesives and to compare the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) after debonding. Materials and Methods: One hundred and seventy-four upper central incisors were extracted and randomly divided to 6 groups (n=29) based on the type of adhesive and two-time intervals post bonding (30 minutes (T1) and 24 hours (T2)): 1) Transbond XT™ 2) BracePaste®, 3) GoTo™. Stainless steel orthodontic brackets were bonded to the teeth. Debonding was completed by an instron machine and shear bond strength recorded together with the ARI following examination under stereo optical microscope with magnification of 10x. Normal distribution was tested using histograms, box plots, the Shapiro-Wilks test and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov’s test. The linear correlation between shear bond strength and ARI score was measured using Pearson’s correlation coefficient by individual test groups and for pooled data. To examine significance of ARI score by group multiple chi-square testing was used. All the analyses were carried out using SPSS version 25.0 and Stata version 15.0. Results: The bond strength of Transbond XT™ was the highest and the strengths at T1 and T2 were not statistically different. The statistical significance was set at 5%. The bond strength of GoTo™ adhesive significantly increased from T1 (200.49N ± 49.77) to T2 (234.89N ± 39.83). BracePaste® showed a statistically significant reduction of its bond strength after 24 hours; 165.07 ± 22.56, down from 187.40N ± 36.90 at T1. This was also significantly less than for the former two adhesives. Water ageing of 24 hrs had a positive impact on Transbond™ and GoTo™ but a negative one on BracePaste®. Transbond XT™ showed the highest score of 3 for ARI at T1 70% and T2 46% followed by GoTo 52% and 35% and BracePaste® 48% and 33%. Conclusion: Transbond XT™ and GoTo™ adhesives showed superior SBS at T1 and showed statistically higher SBS at T2 than for BracePaste®
3种常用正畸胶粘剂的剪切粘结强度
背景:本研究的目的是比较三种正畸粘接剂的剪切粘结强度(SBS)和脱粘后的粘接剂残留指数(ARI)。材料与方法:取出174个上中切牙,根据粘接剂类型和粘接后的两个时间间隔(30分钟(T1)和24小时(T2))随机分为6组(n=29): 1) Transbond XT™2)BracePaste®,3)GoTo™。不锈钢正畸托架粘在牙齿上。在10倍放大的立体光学显微镜下检查,记录剪切粘接强度和ARI。正态分布采用直方图、箱形图、夏皮罗-威尔克斯检验和Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验进行检验。剪切键强度与ARI评分之间的线性相关性采用Pearson相关系数对单个试验组和合并数据进行测量。采用分组多重卡方检验检验ARI评分的显著性。所有分析采用SPSS 25.0和Stata 15.0版本进行。结果:Transbond XT™的结合强度最高,T1和T2时的结合强度无统计学差异。统计学显著性设为5%。GoTo™胶粘剂的结合强度从T1 (200.49N±49.77)显著提高到T2 (234.89N±39.83)。24小时后,BracePaste®的结合强度有统计学上的显著降低;165.07±22.56,低于T1时的187.40±36.90。这也明显少于前两种胶粘剂。24小时的水老化对Transbond™和GoTo™有积极影响,但对BracePaste®有负面影响。Transbond XT™对ARI的评分最高,T1为70%,T2为46%,其次是GoTo,分别为52%和35%,BracePaste分别为48%和33%。结论:Transbond XT™和GoTo™胶粘剂在T1时表现出优越的SBS,在T2时表现出比BracePaste®更高的SBS
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dentistry 3000
Dentistry 3000 Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信