Different Dose Corticosteroid Treatment Protocols for COVID-19 Patients Admitted to Intensive Care: Comparison of the Effects on Efficacy and Mortality

IF 0.1 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Tayfun Et, Muhammet Korkusuz, Rafet Yarımoglu
{"title":"Different Dose Corticosteroid Treatment Protocols for COVID-19 Patients Admitted to Intensive Care: Comparison of the Effects on Efficacy and Mortality","authors":"Tayfun Et, Muhammet Korkusuz, Rafet Yarımoglu","doi":"10.37678/dcybd.2022.3021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: In the present study, our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy of the pulse-steroid treatment used in COVID-19 associated severe ARDS patients, and also to identify its effects on mortality in different doses. Study design: Retrospective Study Method: Patients with severe COVID-19 associated ARDS who had not previously received steroids, but were administered 1 g methylprednisolone (group 1) or 250 mg methylprednisolone (group 2) for 3 days, then 1 mg/kg/day during their hospitalization were retrospectively analyzed. The primary end-point was the discharge rate from the ICU or death. The secondary end-point was the 15th day survival rate. Result(s): A total of 48 patients with a mean age of 70.96+/-11.04 years were included. Twenty-six (54.2%) of them were male, 22 (45.8%) were female. Group 1 included 21 patients, group 2 included 27 patients. There was no difference in terms of demographic characteristics, comorbidities present, and medical findings between the groups on admission, except for the ferritin value which was lower in group 2 (p=0.027). There was no significant difference between groups groups in the 15-day mortality (p=0.134) and length of ICU stay (p=0.329). There was no difference between the groups in terms of discharge rates (p=0.55), need for mechanical ventilation (p=0.381), and complications (p=0.784). The odds ratio regarding the mortality of the patients in the 1 g pulse-steroid group was 3.17 times more likely than the 250 mg pulse-steroid group. Conclusion(s): Our results support that pulse-steroid therapy with 250 mg methylprednisolone may be more effective in patients admitted to intensive care units with ARDS due to COVID-19. Copyright © 2022 by Society of Turkish Intensivist.","PeriodicalId":40137,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Critical & Intensive Care","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Critical & Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37678/dcybd.2022.3021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: In the present study, our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy of the pulse-steroid treatment used in COVID-19 associated severe ARDS patients, and also to identify its effects on mortality in different doses. Study design: Retrospective Study Method: Patients with severe COVID-19 associated ARDS who had not previously received steroids, but were administered 1 g methylprednisolone (group 1) or 250 mg methylprednisolone (group 2) for 3 days, then 1 mg/kg/day during their hospitalization were retrospectively analyzed. The primary end-point was the discharge rate from the ICU or death. The secondary end-point was the 15th day survival rate. Result(s): A total of 48 patients with a mean age of 70.96+/-11.04 years were included. Twenty-six (54.2%) of them were male, 22 (45.8%) were female. Group 1 included 21 patients, group 2 included 27 patients. There was no difference in terms of demographic characteristics, comorbidities present, and medical findings between the groups on admission, except for the ferritin value which was lower in group 2 (p=0.027). There was no significant difference between groups groups in the 15-day mortality (p=0.134) and length of ICU stay (p=0.329). There was no difference between the groups in terms of discharge rates (p=0.55), need for mechanical ventilation (p=0.381), and complications (p=0.784). The odds ratio regarding the mortality of the patients in the 1 g pulse-steroid group was 3.17 times more likely than the 250 mg pulse-steroid group. Conclusion(s): Our results support that pulse-steroid therapy with 250 mg methylprednisolone may be more effective in patients admitted to intensive care units with ARDS due to COVID-19. Copyright © 2022 by Society of Turkish Intensivist.
不同剂量皮质类固醇治疗方案对COVID-19重症监护患者的疗效和死亡率的影响比较
目的:在本研究中,我们的目的是评估脉冲类固醇治疗COVID-19相关严重ARDS患者的疗效,并确定不同剂量对死亡率的影响。研究设计:回顾性研究方法:回顾性分析之前未接受类固醇治疗的严重COVID-19相关ARDS患者,但给予1 g甲基强的松龙(1组)或250 mg甲基强的松龙(2组)3天,然后在住院期间1 mg/kg/天。主要终点为ICU出院率或死亡。次要终点为第15天生存率。结果:共纳入48例患者,平均年龄70.96±11.04岁。其中男性26例(54.2%),女性22例(45.8%)。组1 21例,组2 27例。两组患者入院时的人口学特征、合并症和医学结果均无差异,除了组2的铁蛋白值较低(p=0.027)。两组间15天死亡率(p=0.134)和ICU住院时间(p=0.329)差异无统计学意义。两组在出院率(p=0.55)、机械通气需求(p=0.381)和并发症(p=0.784)方面均无差异。1 g脉冲类固醇组患者死亡率的优势比是250 mg脉冲类固醇组的3.17倍。结论:我们的研究结果支持250 mg甲基强的松龙脉冲类固醇治疗可能对因COVID-19引起的ARDS入住重症监护病房的患者更有效。版权所有©2022由土耳其集约化协会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Critical & Intensive Care
Journal of Critical & Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信