Diagnostic Accuracy and Predictive Value of Latex Agglutination Test, Rapid Cassette Test Compared to ELISA in Diagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii in Pregnant Sudanese Women

Mohammed Wm, Abdalla Hs, Satti Ab, Kabbashi As
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy and Predictive Value of Latex Agglutination Test, Rapid Cassette Test Compared to ELISA in Diagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii in Pregnant Sudanese Women","authors":"Mohammed Wm, Abdalla Hs, Satti Ab, Kabbashi As","doi":"10.35248/2157-7013.19.10.290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There are different procedures for the diagnosis of the pregnant female suspected with toxoplasmosis, however time, cost, and accuracy of the test should meat patients need. Material and Method: Three hundered pregnant female collected from Saad Abualila hospital antenatal care unit, were undergo three different procedures for the diagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii infection. Toxolatex. Toxo IgG-IgM rapid test and ELISA were done for all pregnant female. The result described as frequency and percentage of positivity, also specificity and sensitivity of Toxolatex. Toxo IgG-IgM rapid test were assessed according to ELISA results. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy for Latex agglutination test to detect T. gondii antibodies were: 44.6%, 71.9%, 30.5%, 82.4% and 66. %, while the specificity, sensitivity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy for rapid cassette test to detect T. gondii antibodies were: 29.2%, 88.5%, 41.3%, 81.8% and 75.67%, respectively. Conclusion: Toxo IgG-IgM rapid test(casset) considered as good test for diagnosis of toxoplasmosis and mor specific than Toxolatex with also high diagnostic accuracy.","PeriodicalId":73642,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cell science & therapy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cell science & therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2157-7013.19.10.290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: There are different procedures for the diagnosis of the pregnant female suspected with toxoplasmosis, however time, cost, and accuracy of the test should meat patients need. Material and Method: Three hundered pregnant female collected from Saad Abualila hospital antenatal care unit, were undergo three different procedures for the diagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii infection. Toxolatex. Toxo IgG-IgM rapid test and ELISA were done for all pregnant female. The result described as frequency and percentage of positivity, also specificity and sensitivity of Toxolatex. Toxo IgG-IgM rapid test were assessed according to ELISA results. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy for Latex agglutination test to detect T. gondii antibodies were: 44.6%, 71.9%, 30.5%, 82.4% and 66. %, while the specificity, sensitivity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy for rapid cassette test to detect T. gondii antibodies were: 29.2%, 88.5%, 41.3%, 81.8% and 75.67%, respectively. Conclusion: Toxo IgG-IgM rapid test(casset) considered as good test for diagnosis of toxoplasmosis and mor specific than Toxolatex with also high diagnostic accuracy.
胶乳凝集试验、快速盒试验与ELISA对苏丹孕妇弓形虫诊断的准确性及预测价值
背景:孕妇疑似弓形虫病的诊断有不同的程序,但时间、成本和检测的准确性应满足患者的需要。材料与方法:收集300名来自Saad Abualila医院产前保健部的孕妇,对其进行三种不同的弓形虫感染诊断。Toxolatex。对所有孕妇进行弓形虫IgG-IgM快速检测和ELISA检测。结果描述了弓形虫虫的阳性频率和百分比,以及特异性和敏感性。根据ELISA结果评估弓形虫IgG-IgM快速检测结果。结果:乳胶凝集试验检测弓形虫抗体的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和诊断准确率分别为44.6%、71.9%、30.5%、82.4%和66。快速盒式试验检测弓形虫抗体的特异性、敏感性、PPV、NPV和诊断准确率分别为29.2%、88.5%、41.3%、81.8%和75.67%。结论:弓形虫IgG-IgM快速检测(盒式)是诊断弓形虫病较好的检测方法,其特异性较弓形虫强,诊断准确率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信