Effectiveness of Simulation for Students' Critical Thinking and Financial Constraints in Developing Countries

Anila Naz Ali Sher, T. Rahman
{"title":"Effectiveness of Simulation for Students' Critical Thinking and Financial Constraints in Developing Countries","authors":"Anila Naz Ali Sher, T. Rahman","doi":"10.35248/2155-9627.19.10.339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This review paper is aimed at discussing the characteristics of simulation as teaching strategy as well as an assessment tool and its usability to enhance critical thinking among nursing students. “Simulation is a \"technique\" not a technology that focuses on creating real-life situations to allow students to practice or gain skills in a safe environment”. Likewise, critical thinking is a skillful application of knowledge for judgment and evaluation of complex issues or problems . “The effect of simulation courseware on critical thinking in undergraduate nursing students: Multi-site pre-post study” by has chosen to create a platform for discussion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of an integrated pediatric nursing simulation used in a practicum on students’ critical thinking and to identify the effects of number of simulation exposures on critical thinking in a multisite environment in three different nursing schools. The objective of the study was to explore and examined the effects of exposures of simulation coursework on critical thinking of nursing students. Keywords: Simulation; Healthy Skepticism; Intellectual eagerness, Prudence","PeriodicalId":89408,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical research & bioethics","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical research & bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2155-9627.19.10.339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This review paper is aimed at discussing the characteristics of simulation as teaching strategy as well as an assessment tool and its usability to enhance critical thinking among nursing students. “Simulation is a "technique" not a technology that focuses on creating real-life situations to allow students to practice or gain skills in a safe environment”. Likewise, critical thinking is a skillful application of knowledge for judgment and evaluation of complex issues or problems . “The effect of simulation courseware on critical thinking in undergraduate nursing students: Multi-site pre-post study” by has chosen to create a platform for discussion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of an integrated pediatric nursing simulation used in a practicum on students’ critical thinking and to identify the effects of number of simulation exposures on critical thinking in a multisite environment in three different nursing schools. The objective of the study was to explore and examined the effects of exposures of simulation coursework on critical thinking of nursing students. Keywords: Simulation; Healthy Skepticism; Intellectual eagerness, Prudence
模拟对发展中国家学生批判性思维和经济约束的有效性
摘要:本文旨在探讨模拟作为教学策略和评估工具的特点及其在提高护理学生批判性思维方面的可用性。“模拟是一种‘技术’,而不是一种专注于创造现实生活场景的技术,让学生在安全的环境中练习或获得技能。”同样,批判性思维是对复杂问题或问题进行判断和评估的一种熟练的知识应用。“模拟课件对护理本科学生批判性思维的影响:多站点前后研究”选择创建一个讨论平台。本研究的目的是评估在实习中使用的综合儿科护理模拟对学生批判性思维的影响,并确定在三所不同护理学校的多地点环境中模拟暴露次数对批判性思维的影响。摘要本研究旨在探讨模拟课程对护生批判性思维的影响。关键词:模拟;健康的怀疑;求知欲,谨慎
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信